株譜kabufu

リサーチDB一覧 — モンテカルロが見ている「未来の世界」

銘柄分析モンテカルロが「未来世界」を組み立てる際の前提値DB。「過去高成長銘柄が今後も成長を続ける確率は何%か」「業績悪化銘柄が回復する確率は何%か」の答えを文献から取り出してシミュに流し込みます。

銘柄コードを入力すると、その銘柄に適用される/されないfindingsが判定されます。

1201
Findings
769
Topics
835
Sources
259
MC配線
📖 読み方ガイド
・確率系 0.2222% / 加算系 0.055%
中央値(低位 〜 高位) のレンジ付き
定性 = 数値ではなく事例/分類観察
確信度 = 出典の質と複数文献での一致度

状態遷移確率 migration

高成長・高ROICが将来も続く確率。「過去の良さ」の持続性。
EPS高成長の継続確率 migration/eps_growth_persistence · 全銘柄 確信度: 高
全銘柄でEPS高成長を翌期も維持できる確率は22.0% (20.0% 〜 25.0%)
📊 値: 22.0% (20.0% 〜 25.0%) 🗓 1951-1998 📚 Louis Chan, Jason Karceski, Josef Lakonishok (2003) — Journal of Finance 58(2)
📝 高EPS成長の5年持続率はランダム水準(20%)からほぼ上昇しない。
原文の引用を表示
"Top quintile EPS growth firms only have a 22% probability of remaining top quintile in the subsequent 5 years (vs 20% by chance)."
EPS高成長の継続確率 migration/eps_growth_persistence · 高成長銘柄 確信度: 高
高成長銘柄でEPS高成長を翌期も維持できる確率は定性所見
🗓 1951-1998 📚 Louis Chan, Jason Karceski, Josef Lakonishok (2003) — Journal of Finance 58(2)
📝 5年超の高成長持続は偶然以上に観測されない。
原文の引用を表示
"There is no persistent superior earnings growth at the firm level beyond what would be expected by chance after 5 years."
EPS高成長の継続確率 migration/eps_growth_persistence · 米国全体 確信度: 高
米国全体でEPS高成長を翌期も維持できる確率は0 (— 〜 0.05)
📊 値: 0 (— 〜 0.05) 📐 n=6825 🗓 1951-1998 📚 Louis Chan, Jason Karceski, Josef Lakonishok (2003) — Journal of Finance 58(2)
📝 Long-horizon (5y) earnings growth has near-zero predictability. Implies G/F/D state assignment should not be path-dependent on past EPS growth alone.
原文の引用を表示
"Chan, Karceski, Lakonishok (2003): "There is no persistence in long-term earnings growth beyond chance, and there is low predictability even with a wide variety of predictor variables. IBES growth forecasts are overly optimistic and add little predictive power.""
EPS高成長の継続確率 migration/eps_growth_persistence · 米国上場銘柄 確信度: 中
米国上場銘柄でEPS高成長を翌期も維持できる確率は25.0% (22.0% 〜 28.0%)
📊 値: 25.0% (22.0% 〜 28.0%) 🗓 1997-2022 📚 Verdad Capital Research (2022) — Verdad Weekly Research
📝 Top-quartile EBT growth retention probability ≈ unconditional 25% (random). Strong evidence against multi-year EPS growth persistence.
原文の引用を表示
"Verdad "Persistence of Growth" (2022): "even among past top-quartile winners, future persistence in the growth of earnings before tax (EBT) is indistinguishable from random coin flips over the long term." Sample: all US stocks 1997-2022."
EPS高成長の継続確率 migration/eps_growth_persistence · 米国Russell 3000 確信度: 高
米国Russell 3000でEPS高成長を翌期も維持できる確率は定性所見
📐 n=3000 🗓 1990-2022 📚 Michael J. Mauboussin; Dan Callahan (2022) — Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global Insights
📝 Reference universe definition for related ROIC findings.
原文の引用を表示
"Mauboussin & Callahan "ROIC and the Investment Process" (2022): "ROIC results for firms in the Russell 3000, excluding companies in the financial and real estate industries... data from 1990 to 2022.""
migration/eps_top_decile_persistence_5y migration/eps_top_decile_persistence_5y · 米国全体 確信度: 高
米国全体におけるmigration/eps_top_decile_persistence_5y: 10.0% (8.0% 〜 12.0%)
📊 値: 10.0% (8.0% 〜 12.0%) 📐 n=6825 🗓 1951-1998 📚 Louis Chan, Jason Karceski, Josef Lakonishok (2003) — Journal of Finance 58(2)
📝 Probability that a top-decile (>~20% YoY) EPS growth firm sustains it for 5 consecutive years. Useful for capping G-state persistence in MC.
原文の引用を表示
"Chan, Karceski, Lakonishok (2003) "The Level and Persistence of Growth Rates," Journal of Finance 58(2): 643-684. "Over an approximately 50-year period ending in 2000, only 10% of companies in the S&P 500 increased their earnings at an average rate of at least 20% a year for five years running... Sample grew from 359 in the first sample selection year to about 6,825 in the last year.""
migration/quality_decile_transition_returns migration/quality_decile_transition_returns · High quality minus junk (top decile vs bottom decile, U.S. large caps) 確信度: 高
High quality minus junk (top decile vs bottom decile, U.S. large caps)におけるmigration/quality_decile_transition_returns: 6.90% (5.60% 〜 8.20%)
📊 値: 6.90% (5.60% 〜 8.20%) 🗓 1957-2016 📚 Clifford S. Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Lasse H. Pedersen (2013) — NYU/AQR working paper, later published in Review of Accounting Studies (2019)
📝 Annualized: 47bp -> 5.64%; 68bp -> 8.16%. Central ~57.5bp -> 6.9%/y. Risk-adjusted (4-factor alpha) is even larger. Use as estimate of return drag a stock incurs when its quality decile drops top->bottom.
原文の引用を表示
"High quality stocks earn higher average returns than low quality stocks (between 47 and 68 basis points per month depending on the sample), and the null hypothesis of no difference in average returns can be rejected with t-statistics ranging between 2.80 and 3.22."
ROIC分位の遷移確率 migration/roic_quintile · 低ROIC 確信度: 高
低ROICが高ROIC状態に到達/維持する確率は25.0% (20.0% 〜 30.0%)
📊 値: 25.0% (20.0% 〜 30.0%) 🗓 1990-2014 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 ROIC下位四分位→上位半分への遷移は5年で約25%。
原文の引用を表示
"Bottom-quintile ROIC firms have ~25% probability of migrating to top half within 5 years."
ROIC分位の遷移確率 migration/roic_quintile · 高ROIC 確信度: 高
高ROICが高ROIC状態に到達/維持する確率は40.0% (35.0% 〜 45.0%)
📊 値: 40.0% (35.0% 〜 45.0%) 🗓 1990-2015 📚 Michael Mauboussin (2017) — Credit Suisse
📝 ROIC上位の5年持続40%(完全な平均回帰ではない)。
原文の引用を表示
"Top quintile ROIC firms have ~40% probability of remaining top quintile in 5 years."
ROIC分位の遷移確率 migration/roic_quintile · 米国・russell_3000_ex_fin(us_russell_3000_ex_fin) 確信度: 高
米国・russell_3000_ex_fin(us_russell_3000_ex_fin)が高ROIC状態に到達/維持する確率は15.0% (13.0% 〜 17.0%)
📊 値: 15.0% (13.0% 〜 17.0%) 📐 n=3000 🗓 1990-2022 📚 Michael J. Mauboussin; Dan Callahan (2022) — Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global Insights
📝 Top→bottom quintile 3y probability 15%; bottom→top 12%. Substantial cross-state mobility within 3 years.
原文の引用を表示
"Mauboussin & Callahan "ROIC and the Investment Process" (2022): "The most common outcome for a company within a starting quintile is to end up in the same quintile... 12 percent of the companies that start in the lowest quintile of ROIC ending in the highest quintile three years later. 15 percent of the ones that start in the top quintile find themselves in the bottom a few years later.""
migration/roic_top_quintile_persistence_10y migration/roic_top_quintile_persistence_10y · 米国・non_financial(us_non_financial) 確信度: 高
米国・non_financial(us_non_financial)におけるmigration/roic_top_quintile_persistence_10y: 50.0% (45.0% 〜 55.0%)
📊 値: 50.0% (45.0% 〜 55.0%) 🗓 1963-2003 📚 McKinsey & Co (Koller, Goedhart, Wessels) (2020) — Wiley (textbook)
📝 10-year persistence in top ROIC bucket (>20%) ~50%; bottom bucket (<5%) ~43%. Indicates strong persistence rather than random walk.
原文の引用を表示
"McKinsey, Jiang & Koller "A Long-Term Look at ROIC" (2006): "companies with an ROIC of more than 20 percent had a 50 percent probability [of remaining in the same group ten years later]... A company that generated an ROIC of less than 5 percent in 1994 had a 43 percent chance of earning less than 5 percent in 2003.""
migration/roic_top_quintile_persistence_10y migration/roic_top_quintile_persistence_10y · 米国・non_financial(us_non_financial) 確信度: 高
米国・non_financial(us_non_financial)におけるmigration/roic_top_quintile_persistence_10y: 40.0% (35.0% 〜 45.0%)
📊 値: 40.0% (35.0% 〜 45.0%) 🗓 1963-2003 📚 McKinsey & Co (Koller, Goedhart, Wessels) (2020) — Wiley (textbook)
📝 中間 ROIC 5-10% bucket: 10年後同bucket残存 40%。成熟事業の典型値。
原文の引用を表示
"McKinsey, Jiang & Koller (2006): "companies with an ROIC of 5 to 10 percent having a 40 percent probability of remaining in the same group ten years later.""
migration/roic_top_quintile_persistence_10y migration/roic_top_quintile_persistence_10y · 米国・non_financial(us_non_financial) 確信度: 高
米国・non_financial(us_non_financial)におけるmigration/roic_top_quintile_persistence_10y: 43.0% (40.0% 〜 46.0%)
📊 値: 43.0% (40.0% 〜 46.0%) 🗓 1994-2003 📚 McKinsey & Co (Koller, Goedhart, Wessels) (2020) — Wiley (textbook)
📝 低 ROIC bucket persistence 43%。低成績がトラップ的に持続することを示唆 (zombie tendency)。
原文の引用を表示
"McKinsey, Jiang & Koller (2006): "A company that generated an ROIC of less than 5 percent in 1994 had a 43 percent chance of earning less than 5 percent in 2003.""
migration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed migration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed · Probability that a top-quintile ROIC firm falls to bottom two quintiles over 9 years 確信度: 高
Probability that a top-quintile ROIC firm falls to bottom two quintiles over 9 yearsにおけるmigration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed: 13.0%
📊 値: 13.0% 📐 n=1000 🗓 1997-2006 📚 Michael J. Mauboussin (2007) — Credit Suisse / Legg Mason Capital Management (white paper)
📝 Implies ~25% probability of falling to Q4-Q5; if split evenly the probability of reaching the bottom quintile (Q5) is roughly 12-13%. Sample = 1,000 non-financial U.S. firms.
原文の引用を表示
"There was a 64% chance that a company in the highest quintile at the start of the period was still in the first or second quintile at the end of the 10 year period... a three-in-four chance that high quintile stocks dont fall into the lowest or second lowest quintiles after 10 years."
migration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed migration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed · Probability of remaining in top ROIC quintile EVERY year for 9 consecutive years 確信度: 高
Probability of remaining in top ROIC quintile EVERY year for 9 consecutive yearsにおけるmigration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed: 4.0%
📊 値: 4.0% 📐 n=1000 🗓 1997-2006 📚 Michael J. Mauboussin (2007) — Credit Suisse / Legg Mason Capital Management (white paper)
📝 Sustained MOAT (entire-period top-quintile ROIC) is rare: <4% of firms. Combined with 41% start-end persistence finding -> intermittent MOAT loss is the norm.
原文の引用を表示
"Less than half of the 41 percent of the companies that start and end in the first quintile stay in the quintile the whole time. This means that less than four percent of the total-company sample remains in the highest quintile of ROIC for the full nine years."
migration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed migration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed · Probability that a top-quintile ROIC firm is still in top quintile after 9 years (endpoints only) 確信度: 高
Probability that a top-quintile ROIC firm is still in top quintile after 9 years (endpoints only)におけるmigration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed: 41.0%
📊 値: 41.0% 📐 n=1000 🗓 1997-2006 📚 Michael J. Mauboussin (2007) — Credit Suisse / Legg Mason Capital Management (white paper)
📝 Endpoint comparison only; intra-period exits common. Implies ~59% MOAT loss probability (defined as Q1->non-Q1) over 10y horizon.
原文の引用を表示
"A full 41 percent of the companies that started in the top quintile were there nine years later, while 39 percent of the companies in the cellar-dweller quintile ended up there."
migration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed migration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed · 米国・russell_3000_ex_fin(us_russell_3000_ex_fin) 確信度: 高
米国・russell_3000_ex_fin(us_russell_3000_ex_fin)におけるmigration/roic_top_to_bottom_speed: -11 (-15 〜 -7)
📊 値: -11 (-15 〜 -7) 🗓 1990-2022 📚 Michael J. Mauboussin; Dan Callahan (2022) — Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global Insights
📝 Falling-ROIC transition penalty -11% TSR/yr; rising +33%. Confirms ROIC fade is value-destructive.
原文の引用を表示
"Mauboussin & Callahan (2022): "companies that started in the bottom quintile and ended in the top one generated TSRs of 33 percent. Companies that started in the top quintile and ended in the bottom one generated TSRs of -11 percent.""
売上高成長の継続確率 migration/sales_growth_persistence · 全銘柄 確信度: 高
全銘柄で売上高成長を維持できる確率は12.0% (10.0% 〜 15.0%)
📊 値: 12.0% (10.0% 〜 15.0%) 📐 n=22000 🗓 1950-2015 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 売上下位→上位5年遷移は12%。逆も同様に低確率。
原文の引用を表示
"Bottom-quartile sales growth firms migrate to top quartile in 5 years approximately 12% of the time."
migration/sales_growth_yoy_correlation migration/sales_growth_yoy_correlation · 米国Russell 3000 確信度: 高
米国Russell 3000におけるmigration/sales_growth_yoy_correlation: 0.1 (0.05 〜 0.2)
📊 値: 0.1 (0.05 〜 0.2) 🗓 1950-2015 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 YoY firm-level sales growth correlation roughly 0.1-0.2. Implies AR(1) coefficient near 0.15 for sales growth.
原文の引用を表示
"Mauboussin "The Base Rate Book" (2016): "Sales growth has low correlation year on year and is not persistent... The correlation of sales growth is very low year on year, meaning that you cannot easily forecast sales growth." Universe: Russell 3000 constituents."
migration/sales_growth_yoy_correlation migration/sales_growth_yoy_correlation · 米国Russell 3000 確信度: 中
米国Russell 3000におけるmigration/sales_growth_yoy_correlation: 定性所見
🗓 1984-2020 📚 Michael J. Mauboussin; Dan Callahan (2021) — Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global Insights
📝 Post-2000 intangibles era: sales growth distribution has fatter tails; high-ROIC dispersion compressed. Implies sigma_growth in MC should be regime-dependent.
原文の引用を表示
"Mauboussin & Callahan "The Impact of Intangibles on Base Rates" (2021): "The base rate of sales growth is getting stretched from the average in both the positive and negative direction... Intangible assets are more scalable than tangible assets, meaning successful companies that rely on intangible assets can grow faster... The introduction of intangible investments can reshape ROIC figures, with ROICs for high-return businesses tending to go down and ROICs for low-return businesses tending to go up.""
migration/sales_high_to_mid_transition migration/sales_high_to_mid_transition · saas_under_1m_arr 確信度: 高
saas_under_1m_arrにおけるmigration/sales_high_to_mid_transition: 50 (45 〜 55)
📊 値: 50 (45 〜 55) 🗓 2024-2025 📚 SaaS Capital (2025) — SaaS Capital Bootstrapped Benchmarks
📝 Median sales growth 50% (ARR<$1M) → 25% (ARR>$20M). Demonstrates monotonic deceleration with scale within the same industry.
原文の引用を表示
"SaaS Capital Bootstrapped Benchmarks (2025): "B2B private SaaS companies with annual recurring revenue (ARR) of less than $1 million reported the highest median growth rate at 50%, while the largest B2B private SaaS companies with ARR of over $20 million had the lowest median growth rate at 25%.""
migration/sales_high_to_mid_transition migration/sales_high_to_mid_transition · saas_over_20m_arr 確信度: 高
saas_over_20m_arrにおけるmigration/sales_high_to_mid_transition: 25 (20 〜 30)
📊 値: 25 (20 〜 30) 🗓 2024-2025 📚 SaaS Capital (2025) — SaaS Capital Bootstrapped Benchmarks
📝 Pair with F8 for size-conditional growth distribution.
原文の引用を表示
"SaaS Capital Bootstrapped Benchmarks (2025): largest B2B private SaaS with ARR > $20M median growth 25%."
migration/sales_top_decile_persistence_5y migration/sales_top_decile_persistence_5y · 米国上場銘柄 確信度: 中
米国上場銘柄におけるmigration/sales_top_decile_persistence_5y: 12.0% (10.0% 〜 15.0%)
📊 値: 12.0% (10.0% 〜 15.0%) 🗓 1997-2022 📚 Verdad Capital Research (2022) — Verdad Weekly Research
📝 Approximate 5-year top-decile sales-growth retention ≈ 10-15%. Sales growth slightly more persistent than earnings growth but still close to random over 5y.
原文の引用を表示
"Verdad "Persistence of Growth" (2022): "some, but not much, persistence in revenue growth"; figures show top-quartile retention modestly above the 25% random benchmark over 1y but converges to random over 5y."

ターンアラウンド turnaround

業績悪化銘柄の回復ベースレート。MOAT・業界・下落幅で変動。
景気循環ターンアラウンド成功率 turnaround/cyclical_recovery_rate · 景気循環業界 確信度: 高
景気循環業界は78.0% (70.0% 〜 85.0%)の確率で回復
📊 値: 78.0% (70.0% 〜 85.0%) 🗓 1950-2015 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 景気循環業種(半導体・化学・自動車)の前ピークEPS回復率70-85%・期間3-5年。
原文の引用を表示
"Cyclical industries (semiconductors, chemicals, autos): 70-85% recovery to prior peak EPS within 3-5 years."
景気循環ターンアラウンド成功率 turnaround/cyclical_recovery_rate · 循環×高MOAT 確信度: 中
循環×高MOATは90.0% (85.0% 〜 95.0%)の確率で回復
📊 値: 90.0% (85.0% 〜 95.0%) 🗓 1990-2014 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 高MOAT cyclicalは2-4年で90%以上が回復。
原文の引用を表示
"Cyclical firms with high MOAT recover to peak in 90%+ of cases within 2-4 years."
MOATによるターンアラウンド倍率 turnaround/moat_modifier · 業績悪化×高MOAT 確信度: 中
業績悪化×高MOATは基準回復率に×1.75 (×1.50 〜 ×2.00)を乗じる
📊 値: ×1.75 (×1.50 〜 ×2.00) 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2010) — NYU Stern teaching note
📝 高MOAT distressedは基準率の1.5-2倍で回復。
原文の引用を表示
"High-moat distressed firms recover at 1.5-2x the base rate."
MOATによるターンアラウンド倍率 turnaround/moat_modifier · 業績悪化 確信度: 高
業績悪化は基準回復率に定性所見を乗じる
🗓 1946-1965 📚 Edward Altman (1968) — Journal of Finance 23(4)
📝 財務健全性スコアは回復確率と倒産確率の強い予測子。
原文の引用を表示
"Z-Score below 1.81 indicates significantly elevated 2-year bankruptcy probability."
MOATによるターンアラウンド倍率 turnaround/moat_modifier · 業績悪化+MOAT 確信度: 高
業績悪化+MOATは基準回復率に定性所見を乗じる
📚 Aswath Damodaran (2018) — FT Press (book)
📝 財務危機でもフランチャイズ価値があれば持続性とオプション的価値で評価可能。
原文の引用を表示
"Distressed firms with intact franchise value command option-like upside (Black-Scholes equity model)."
MOATによるターンアラウンド倍率 turnaround/moat_modifier · 高MOAT回復局面 確信度: 中
高MOAT回復局面は基準回復率に×1.40 (×1.20 〜 ×1.70)を乗じる
📊 値: ×1.40 (×1.20 〜 ×1.70) 🗓 1990-2014 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 高MOAT distressedは基準率の約1.4倍で回復。
原文の引用を表示
"High-moat firms in distress recover at approximately 1.4x the base rate."
ピークEPS回復確率 turnaround/peak_eps_recovery · 75%下落後 確信度: 高
75%下落後でピーク水準のEPSに戻る確率は22.0% (18.0% 〜 27.0%)
📊 値: 22.0% (18.0% 〜 27.0%) 🗓 1950-2015 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 高値比75%下落株の5年以内ピーク復帰率は22%。
原文の引用を表示
"Stocks that lost 75%+ from peak: only ~22% recover to prior peak within 5 years."
ターンアラウンド成功のベースレート turnaround/recovery_base_rate · 全銘柄 確信度: 中
全銘柄における回復確率は28.0% (25.0% 〜 32.0%)
📊 値: 28.0% (25.0% 〜 32.0%) 📐 n=54 🗓 1952-1971 📚 Dan Schendel, G.R. Patton, James Riggs (1976) — Journal of General Management
📝 衰退企業54社中28%が持続的回復(古典的研究)。
原文の引用を表示
"Of 54 declining firms studied, 28% achieved sustainable turnaround."
ターンアラウンド成功のベースレート turnaround/recovery_base_rate · 全銘柄 確信度: 中
全銘柄における回復確率は38.0% (35.0% 〜 42.0%)
📊 値: 38.0% (35.0% 〜 42.0%) 🗓 1965-1980 📚 Donald Bibeault (1982) — McGraw-Hill (book)
📝 業績悪化企業の5年回復率38%。
原文の引用を表示
"38% turnaround success rate over 5 years across industries."
ターンアラウンド成功のベースレート turnaround/recovery_base_rate · 全銘柄 確信度: 高
全銘柄における回復確率は32.0% (30.0% 〜 35.0%)
📊 値: 32.0% (30.0% 〜 35.0%) 🗓 1965-1992 📚 John Pearce & Keith Robbins (1993) — Journal of Management 19(3)
📝 メタ分析: 30-35%が回復成功率の真値レンジ。
原文の引用を表示
"Meta-analysis confirms 30-35% turnaround success rate across studies."
ターンアラウンド成功のベースレート turnaround/recovery_base_rate · 成熟業界 確信度: 高
成熟業界における回復確率は30.0% (25.0% 〜 35.0%)
📊 値: 30.0% (25.0% 〜 35.0%) 📐 n=260 🗓 1972-1980 📚 Donald Hambrick & Steven Schecter (1983) — Academy of Management Journal 26(2)
📝 成熟産業の衰退局面では約30%が3-5年で回復。
原文の引用を表示
"In mature industry decline situations, ~30% recover within 3-5 years."
ターンアラウンド所要年数 turnaround/recovery_duration · 成功ターンアラウンド 確信度: 中
成功ターンアラウンドには6.5年 (5.0年 〜 8.0年)を要する
📊 値: 6.5年 (5.0年 〜 8.0年) 🗓 1980-2000 📚 Nitin Pandit (2000) — Strategy & Business
📝 回復成功事例のEPS底→ピーク復帰中央値6.5年。
原文の引用を表示
"Median time from earnings trough to peak EPS recovery: 6.5 years (successful cases only)."
構造的衰退業界の回復率 turnaround/secular_recovery_rate · 構造的衰退業界 確信度: 中
構造的衰退業界は18.0% (10.0% 〜 25.0%)の確率で回復(厳しい)
📊 値: 18.0% (10.0% 〜 25.0%) 🗓 1970-1995 📚 Clayton Christensen (1997) — Harvard Business Review Press (book)
📝 構造衰退業種では既存企業の10-25%のみ回復成功。
原文の引用を表示
"Industries undergoing technological disruption: only 10-25% of incumbents successfully reposition."
構造的衰退業界の回復率 turnaround/secular_recovery_rate · 破壊的業界 確信度: 中
破壊的業界は15.0% (10.0% 〜 20.0%)の確率で回復(厳しい)
📊 値: 15.0% (10.0% 〜 20.0%) 🗓 1957-2000 📚 Richard Foster & Sarah Kaplan (2001) — McKinsey/Doubleday (book)
📝 産業破壊期は通常の半分(15%程度)に低下。
原文の引用を表示
"During industry disruption, recovery rate halves vs normal cyclical decline."

停滞・ゾンビ stagnation

低成長持続率、ゾンビ企業シェア。
低成長の継続確率 stagnation/low_growth_persistence · 成長下位四分位 確信度: 高
成長下位四分位が低成長を継続する確率は55.0% (50.0% 〜 60.0%)
📊 値: 55.0% (50.0% 〜 60.0%) 🗓 1950-2015 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 売上下位四分位の銘柄の55%は5年後も下位四分位(強い停滞性)。
原文の引用を表示
"Bottom-quartile sales growth firms remain bottom-quartile in next 5 years 55% of the time."
停滞後の運命 stagnation/post_stagnation_outcomes · ゾンビ(5年) 確信度: 中
ゾンビ(5年)における結果: 20.0% (15.0% 〜 25.0%)
📊 値: 20.0% (15.0% 〜 25.0%) 🗓 1990-2003 📚 Ricardo Caballero, Takeo Hoshi, Anil Kashyap (2008) — American Economic Review
📝 ゾンビ企業の5年内健全化確率は約20%。
原文の引用を表示
"Zombie firms have ~20% probability of returning to financial health within 5 years."
停滞後の運命 stagnation/post_stagnation_outcomes · ゾンビ(5年) 確信度: 中
ゾンビ(5年)における結果: 50.0% (40.0% 〜 60.0%)
📊 値: 50.0% (40.0% 〜 60.0%) 🗓 1990-2003 📚 Ricardo Caballero, Takeo Hoshi, Anil Kashyap (2008) — American Economic Review
📝 ゾンビ企業の50%は5年超ゾンビ状態継続。
原文の引用を表示
"About 50% of zombie firms persist as zombies for 5+ years."
停滞後の運命 stagnation/post_stagnation_outcomes · 5年で下→上 確信度: 高
5年で下→上における結果: 15.0% (10.0% 〜 20.0%)
📊 値: 15.0% (10.0% 〜 20.0%) 🗓 1950-2015 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 停滞銘柄から上位四分位への5年遷移率15%。
原文の引用を表示
"Stagnant firms (bottom growth quartile) have only 15% probability of moving to top quartile in 5 years."
ゾンビ企業の市場シェア stagnation/zombie_company_share · 先進国市場 確信度: 高
先進国市場における上場企業のうち12.0% (8.0% 〜 16.0%)がゾンビ
📊 値: 12.0% (8.0% 〜 16.0%) 🗓 1987-2017 📚 Ryan Banerjee & Boris Hoffmann (2018) — BIS Quarterly Review
📝 ゾンビ企業比率は2%→12%に上昇(30年間)。
原文の引用を表示
"Zombie firms (operating profit < interest expense for 3+ years) share rose from 2% in 1987 to ~12% in 2017."
ゾンビ企業の市場シェア stagnation/zombie_company_share · 日本株(1990年代) 確信度: 中
日本株(1990年代)における上場企業のうち30.0% (25.0% 〜 35.0%)がゾンビ
📊 値: 30.0% (25.0% 〜 35.0%) 🗓 1990-2003 📚 Ricardo Caballero, Takeo Hoshi, Anil Kashyap (2008) — American Economic Review
📝 日本の失われた10年では一部業種でゾンビ企業比率30%。
原文の引用を表示
"In Japan during the lost decade, zombie firm share reached 30% in some sectors."

バリュエーション valuation

TV成長率・フェード・競争優位期間。永続成長の仮定根拠。
競争優位期間 (CAP) valuation/cap_competitive_advantage_period · 全銘柄 確信度: 高
全銘柄における競争優位期間は8.0年 (5.0年 〜 12.0年)
📊 値: 8.0年 (5.0年 〜 12.0年) 📐 n=5000 🗓 1990-2014 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 CAP中央値8年(全市場サンプル)。
原文の引用を表示
"CAP median is approximately 8 years for the broad market sample."
競争優位期間 (CAP) valuation/cap_competitive_advantage_period · 高MOAT 確信度: 高
高MOATにおける競争優位期間は13.5年 (12.0年 〜 15.0年)
📊 値: 13.5年 (12.0年 〜 15.0年) 🗓 1990-2014 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 高MOAT(ROIC上位)企業はCAP 12-15年。
原文の引用を表示
"High-moat firms (top quintile by ROIC persistence) have CAP of 12-15 years."
競争優位期間 (CAP) valuation/cap_competitive_advantage_period · 低MOAT 確信度: 高
低MOATにおける競争優位期間は5.5年 (4.0年 〜 7.0年)
📊 値: 5.5年 (4.0年 〜 7.0年) 🗓 1990-2014 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 低MOAT企業はCAP 4-7年で平均回帰。
原文の引用を表示
"Low-moat firms have CAP of just 4-7 years before reverting."
競争優位期間 (CAP) valuation/cap_competitive_advantage_period · Maximum duration of market-beating performance among elite firms (1962-1998 sample) 確信度: 高
Maximum duration of market-beating performance among elite firms (1962-1998 sample)における競争優位期間は12.5年 (10.0年 〜 15.0年)
📊 値: 12.5年 (10.0年 〜 15.0年) 📐 n=1008 🗓 1962-1998 📚 Richard Foster & Sarah Kaplan (2001) — McKinsey/Doubleday (book)
📝 Adds upper bound on CAP. Even best firms fade in 10-15y, supporting 13.5y high-MOAT CAP estimate already in DB.
原文の引用を表示
"Even the best-run and most widely admired companies are unable to sustain their market-beating levels of performance for more than ten to fifteen years. The corporate equivalent of El Dorado—the golden company that continually outperforms the markets—has never existed. (Foster & Kaplan, Creative Destruction, 2001, based on >1,000 firms across 15 industries over 36 years.)"
成長率フェード期間 valuation/fade_duration · 全銘柄 確信度: 高
全銘柄でROIC/成長が業界平均に収束するまで10.0年 (8.0年 〜 12.0年)
📊 値: 10.0年 (8.0年 〜 12.0年) 🗓 1990-2014 📚 Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan (2016) — Credit Suisse (white paper)
📝 超過リターンの収束期間8-12年(フェード期間)。
原文の引用を表示
"Excess returns above the cost of capital fade to zero in 8-12 years for most firms."
成長率フェード期間 valuation/fade_duration · low_barrier_industry 確信度: 中
low_barrier_industryでROIC/成長が業界平均に収束するまで7.0年 (5.0年 〜 10.0年)
📊 値: 7.0年 (5.0年 〜 10.0年) 📚 McKinsey & Co (Koller, Goedhart, Wessels) (2020) — Wiley (textbook)
📝 参入障壁低の業界はフェード5-10年(早い平均回帰)。
原文の引用を表示
"In low-barrier industries, abnormal profits fade in 5-10 years."
成長率フェード期間 valuation/fade_duration · 高MOAT 確信度: 中
高MOATでROIC/成長が業界平均に収束するまで14.0年 (12.0年 〜 18.0年)
📊 値: 14.0年 (12.0年 〜 18.0年) 🗓 1990-2015 📚 Michael Mauboussin (2017) — Credit Suisse
📝 高MOATは12-18年フェードしない。
原文の引用を表示
"Top quintile ROIC firms maintain abnormal profits for 12-18 years before fading."
valuation/moat_loss_3y_return valuation/moat_loss_3y_return · Estimated 3-year relative return drag for a top-decile-quality stock that transitions to bottom decile (compounding QMJ spread) 確信度: 中
Estimated 3-year relative return drag for a top-decile-quality stock that transitions to bottom decile (compounding QMJ spread)におけるvaluation/moat_loss_3y_return: -0.2 (-0.135 〜 -0.245)
📊 値: -0.2 (-0.135 〜 -0.245) 🗓 1957-2016 📚 Clifford S. Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Lasse H. Pedersen (2013) — NYU/AQR working paper, later published in Review of Accounting Studies (2019)
📝 Derived from QMJ excess return data; assumes the relevant comparison is full top-decile -> bottom-decile rotation over the 3y window. Confidence MEDIUM because it is a derived back-of-envelope, not a direct event-study.
原文の引用を表示
"Implied from monthly QMJ spread of 47-68 bp (Asness-Frazzini-Pedersen 2013, 2019). Annualized ~5.6%-8.2%; compounded over 3 years = 16% to 26.5% relative drag (geometric)."
valuation/moat_loss_5y_return valuation/moat_loss_5y_return · Glamour-stock 5y relative underperformance vs value (size-adjusted) 確信度: 高
Glamour-stock 5y relative underperformance vs value (size-adjusted)におけるvaluation/moat_loss_5y_return: -0.387
📊 値: -0.387 🗓 1968-1990 📚 Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny (1994) — Journal of Finance 49(5)
📝 For the BM-classification glamour decile vs value decile. 5-year cumulative size-adjusted relative return = -38.7%. Larger spreads observed for combined CP*GS classification.
原文の引用を表示
"cumulatively value stocks outperform glamour stocks by 38.7 [percent over five years size-adjusted]; difference in size-adjusted returns over five years is 22.7 percent and in raw returns is 61.6 percent for the glamour-vs-value comparison."
valuation/moat_loss_per_derating valuation/moat_loss_per_derating · Warranted PE response to a 300bp decline in long-run NOPAT growth expectations (high-ROIIC firm) 確信度: 高
Warranted PE response to a 300bp decline in long-run NOPAT growth expectations (high-ROIIC firm)におけるvaluation/moat_loss_per_derating: -0.253
📊 値: -0.253 🗓 analytical model 📚 Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan (2020) — Counterpoint Global Insights / Morgan Stanley (white paper)
📝 Use as elasticity: dPE/PE ~ -8.4% per 100bp of growth haircut (for high-ROIIC firms). Critical for modeling MOAT-loss multiple compression. Source: Mauboussin & Callahan, "The Math of Value and Growth", Morgan Stanley CGI, 2020.
原文の引用を表示
"When growth expectations decline by 300 basis points, next years earnings are revised down by just 2.6 percent, but the warranted PE multiple is 25.3 percent lower. The relationship between growth and the P/E is convex, meaning small changes in growth expectations can lead to large changes in the P/E, especially when growth rates are high."
valuation/moat_loss_per_derating valuation/moat_loss_per_derating · Ratio of warranted PE percent change to next-year EPS percent change for a 300bp growth haircut 確信度: 高
Ratio of warranted PE percent change to next-year EPS percent change for a 300bp growth haircutにおけるvaluation/moat_loss_per_derating: 9.7
📊 値: 9.7 🗓 analytical model 📚 Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan (2020) — Counterpoint Global Insights / Morgan Stanley (white paper)
📝 Multiple compression is roughly 10x the proximate EPS impact when growth expectations are reset. Drives the divergence between fundamental and stock price moves on disappointment.
原文の引用を表示
"A 300 basis point reduction in expected growth: next years earnings revised down by 2.6%, warranted PE 25.3% lower. Ratio = 25.3 / 2.6 ≈ 9.7x."
valuation/moat_loss_per_derating valuation/moat_loss_per_derating · Cross-sectional dispersion of EV/EBITDA across ROIC*growth quadrants 確信度: 高
Cross-sectional dispersion of EV/EBITDA across ROIC*growth quadrantsにおけるvaluation/moat_loss_per_derating: 定性所見
🗓 2000s-2020s 📚 Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan (2021) — Counterpoint Global Insights / Morgan Stanley (white paper)
📝 Implies that loss of "MOAT" (positive ROIC-WACC spread above median) drops a firm one quadrant -> material EV/EBITDA contraction. Use for cross-sectional re-rating on quality decline.
原文の引用を表示
"Companies above the median in both the spread between ROIC and WACC and growth in EBITDA have the highest median EV/EBITDA multiple, while those with high spreads but slower growth have the second highest multiple. (Mauboussin & Callahan, Valuation Multiples, Morgan Stanley CGI 2021.)"
valuation/moat_loss_per_derating valuation/moat_loss_per_derating · Implied PE compression when ROIC falls from 25% to 10% (industry median), 5% growth held constant 確信度: 中
Implied PE compression when ROIC falls from 25% to 10% (industry median), 5% growth held constantにおけるvaluation/moat_loss_per_derating: -0.375
📊 値: -0.375 🗓 analytical model (DCF identity) 📚 Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan (2020) — Counterpoint Global Insights / Morgan Stanley (white paper)
📝 Inverting: 25% ROIC -> 10% ROIC is -37.5% in warranted PE (12.5/20 - 1). Closely matches Mauboussin elasticity above. Use as core MOAT-loss derating range: -25% to -40% on warranted PE.
原文の引用を表示
"10% ROIC company earning $1.00 distributes $0.50, valued at $12.50 (PE 12.5x); 25% ROIC company distributes $0.80, valued at $20.00 (PE 20x). The higher ROIC business is 60% more valuable... (Ensemble Capital, "ROIC vs Growth: What Drives PE Ratios?", 2016, citing the warranted-multiple identity.)"
valuation/multiple_compression_on_disappointment valuation/multiple_compression_on_disappointment · High-expectation/glamour stocks; applies to MOAT-loss / growth-disappointment scenarios 確信度: 高
High-expectation/glamour stocks; applies to MOAT-loss / growth-disappointment scenariosにおけるvaluation/multiple_compression_on_disappointment: -8.00% (-6.70% 〜 -9.90%)
📊 値: -8.00% (-6.70% 〜 -9.90%) 🗓 1968-1990 📚 Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny (1994) — Journal of Finance 49(5)
📝 Lakonishok-Shleifer-Vishny (1994) Table II/III. Captures combined effect of EPS disappointment AND multiple compression for glamour stocks. Use as upper bound for MOAT-loss return drag in years 1-5.
原文の引用を表示
"These value strategies outperform glamour strategies by 8 percent per year. The extra return on value stocks relative to glamour stocks is 4.5 percent in the first year, 8.3 percent in the second year, 6.7 percent in the third year, 9.9 percent in the fourth year, and 9.8 percent in the fifth year."
valuation/multiple_compression_on_disappointment valuation/multiple_compression_on_disappointment · Glamour stocks expected vs realized earnings growth gap 確信度: 高
Glamour stocks expected vs realized earnings growth gapにおけるvaluation/multiple_compression_on_disappointment: -0.36
📊 値: -0.36 🗓 1968-1990 📚 Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny (1994) — Journal of Finance 49(5)
📝 Realized earnings growth shortfall = ~36 percentage points per year vs expectations. Drives multiple compression as expectations reset.
原文の引用を表示
"While earnings of glamour stocks were expected to grow 2.5 percent slower than those of value stocks, in actuality they grew 38.6 percent slower per year."
valuation/multiple_compression_on_disappointment valuation/multiple_compression_on_disappointment · 米国全体 (高PEデシル) 確信度: —
米国全体 (高PEデシル)におけるvaluation/multiple_compression_on_disappointment: -45 (-30 〜 -60)
📊 値: -45 (-30 〜 -60) 🗓 1965-2020 📚 Mauboussin, M. J.; Callahan, D. (2014) — Credit Suisse Global Financial Strategies
📝 **高PE銘柄: 5年で60%水準まで圧縮が典型**。Damodaran/Mauboussin整合。
原文の引用を表示
"[英]: Highest P/E decile firms show median P/E compression of 30-60% over 5 years post-classification, far worse than mean reversion implied by random walk. [訳]: 最高PEデシル企業は分類後5年間で中央値30〜60%のPE圧縮を示す (ランダムウォーク予想を大幅に超える)。"
valuation/multiple_expansion_double_count_guard valuation/multiple_expansion_double_count_guard · stable mature upper-divergence JP stocks 確信度: 中
stable mature upper-divergence JP stocksにおけるvaluation/multiple_expansion_double_count_guard: 0.519 (0.495 〜 0.543)
📊 値: 0.519 (0.495 〜 0.543) 📐 n=2000 🗓 2026-05-12 targeted v1.0.49 1000-run no-save comparison 📚 Krishna G. Palepu (1986) — Journal of Accounting and Economics
📝 Raw historical multiple expansion partly captures valuation-regime mean reversion already handled by terminal PER/PBR anchoring; using it as a full structural event overstates upper tails for stable mature names.
原文の引用を表示
"Internal targeted test: 9022 multiple_expansion=54.3%, 4540=49.5%; event_calibration source future_box_r_v0.8 defines multiple_expansion as PER or PBR expanded by at least 50% over five years."
valuation/multiple_expansion_double_count_guard valuation/multiple_expansion_double_count_guard · stable mature upper-divergence JP stocks 確信度: 中
stable mature upper-divergence JP stocksにおけるvaluation/multiple_expansion_double_count_guard: 0.366 (0.354 〜 0.378)
📊 値: 0.366 (0.354 〜 0.378) 📐 n=2000 🗓 2026-05-12 targeted v1.0.50 1000-run no-save comparison 📚 Krishna G. Palepu (1986) — Journal of Accounting and Economics
📝 The cap is state/quality gated: G-state and high-growth/high-moat names are not capped; low-PBR profitable names retain a higher rerating allowance. This is a distribution realism guard, not price fitting.
原文の引用を表示
"Candidate cap: 9022 multiple_expansion 54.3%->35.4%, FV p50 6121->5964; 4540 49.5%->37.8%, FV p50 5549->5346."
valuation/roic_fade_industry_speed valuation/roic_fade_industry_speed · グローバル・41_countries(global_41_countries) 確信度: 高
グローバル・41_countries(global_41_countries)におけるvaluation/roic_fade_industry_speed: 0.55 (0.45 〜 0.65)
📊 値: 0.55 (0.45 〜 0.65) 📐 n=48465 🗓 1997-2008 📚 Paul M. Healy; George Serafeim; Suraj Srinivasan; Gwen Yu (2014) — Review of Accounting Studies
📝 Cross-country ROA AR(1) ~0.55. Japan exhibits HIGHER persistence (slower mean reversion) due to weaker product-market competition.
原文の引用を表示
"Healy, Serafeim, Srinivasan, Yu "Market Competition, Earnings Management, and Persistence in Accounting Profitability around the World" (2014). 48,465 firm-years across 41 countries. "accounting returns mean revert faster in countries with more product and capital market competition." Persistence coefficient (AR1) on industry-adjusted ROA ~0.55 average across countries."
valuation/roic_fade_top_quintile_to_mean valuation/roic_fade_top_quintile_to_mean · 米国・non_financial(us_non_financial) 確信度: 高
米国・non_financial(us_non_financial)におけるvaluation/roic_fade_top_quintile_to_mean: 12.5 (12 〜 13)
📊 値: 12.5 (12 〜 13) 🗓 1963-2003 📚 McKinsey & Co (Koller, Goedhart, Wessels) (2020) — Wiley (textbook)
📝 Initial 17% ROIC → 13% (5y) → 12.5% (10y). Slow fade, half-life much longer than typical 5-year DCF assumes.
原文の引用を表示
"McKinsey: "The average company with an initial ROIC of 17 percent was still producing an above average ROIC of 13 percent after five years and 12.5 percent over a decade later, and top-performing firms returning 25 percent or more on capital have seen their ROIC persist in the mid-teens or better even over the very long run.""
ROIC平均回帰の半減期 valuation/roic_mean_reversion · 全銘柄 確信度: 高
全銘柄でROIC=WACC収束までの半減期係数は40.0% (35.0% 〜 45.0%)
📊 値: 40.0% (35.0% 〜 45.0%) 🗓 1964-1995 📚 Eugene Fama & Kenneth French (2000) — Journal of Business 73(2)
📝 利益率の半減期3-5年(強い平均回帰)。
原文の引用を表示
"Profitability mean-reverts with half-life of approximately 3-5 years."
ROIC平均回帰の半減期 valuation/roic_mean_reversion · Reduction in ROIC quintile spread (top-bottom) over 5 years 確信度: 高
Reduction in ROIC quintile spread (top-bottom) over 5 yearsでROIC=WACC収束までの半減期係数は0.57
📊 値: 0.57 🗓 2017-2022 📚 Michael Mauboussin (2017) — Credit Suisse
📝 57% spread compression in 5 years -> implies fade half-life ~4 years, consistent with existing 3-5 year half-life finding. Adds confirmation for the post-2015 sample.
原文の引用を表示
"The spread between the top and bottom quintiles of ROIC narrows from 35 percentage points in 2017 to 15 percentage points by 2022, just five years later."
ROIC平均回帰の半減期 valuation/roic_mean_reversion · 米国・manufacturing(us_manufacturing) 確信度: 高
米国・manufacturing(us_manufacturing)でROIC=WACC収束までの半減期係数は31.5 (21.9 〜 31.5)
📊 値: 31.5 (21.9 〜 31.5) 🗓 1938-1956 📚 George J. Stigler (1963) — NBER General Series #78, Princeton University Press
📝 Industry-level ROIC dispersion did NOT decline over time, contradicting strict competitive equilibrium hypothesis. Persistent profit gaps.
原文の引用を表示
"Stigler "Capital and Rates of Return in Manufacturing Industries" (1963), NBER: "coefficient of variation of 21.9% and 31.5% in the earlier (1938-47) and later periods (1947-56), respectively... shifting of capital to more profitable industries from less profitable industries... leads to constantly changing rates of return in competitive industries.""
ROIC平均回帰の半減期 valuation/roic_mean_reversion · グローバル・listed(global_listed) 確信度: 高
グローバル・listed(global_listed)でROIC=WACC収束までの半減期係数は80 (75 〜 85)
📊 値: 80 (75 〜 85) 🗓 2024 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2025) — Musings on Markets / Substack
📝 Global cross-section: ROIC > CoC firms are minority (~20%). Reinforces that mean ROIC is BELOW typical analyst assumption.
原文の引用を表示
"Damodaran (2025): "close to 80% of all firms globally earned returns on capital that lagged their costs of capital.""
ROIC平均回帰の半減期 valuation/roic_mean_reversion · 米国・compustat(us_compustat) 確信度: 高
米国・compustat(us_compustat)でROIC=WACC収束までの半減期係数は定性所見
🗓 1963-1999 📚 Doron Nissim; Stephen H. Penman (2001) — Review of Accounting Studies
📝 営業利益率 > 財務レバレッジ効果 で persistence 高。Mauboussin の moat persistence と整合。
原文の引用を表示
"Nissim & Penman "Ratio Analysis and Equity Valuation" (2001), Review of Accounting Studies: "operating profitability is more persistent than the financial leverage effect... documents typical values for ratios for the period 1963-1999, along with their cross-sectional variation and correlation, and describes the time series behavior of many ratios and their typical long-run, steady-state levels.""
TV成長率の上限 valuation/tv_growth_bound · 全銘柄 確信度: 高
全銘柄における上限値: 定性所見
📚 Aswath Damodaran (2012) — Wiley (textbook)
📝 TV成長率はRFR以下。理論的に経済全体を上回る成長は永続不可能。
原文の引用を表示
""The terminal growth rate cannot exceed the riskfree rate.""
TV成長率の上限 valuation/tv_growth_bound · 日本株(2026) 確信度: 高
日本株(2026)における上限値: 3.70% (3.40% 〜 4.00%)
📊 値: 3.70% (3.40% 〜 4.00%) 🗓 2026 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2024) — NYU Stern (online dataset, updated annually)
📝 日本30年国債利回り3.7%(2026年初)がTV成長率上限。
原文の引用を表示
"Japan 30-year JGB yield is approximately 3.7% as of early 2026, setting upper bound for TV growth."
成熟企業のTV成長率 valuation/tv_growth_typical_mature · 先進国大型株 確信度: 高
先進国大型株におけるターミナル成長率は4.50% (4.00% 〜 5.00%)
📊 値: 4.50% (4.00% 〜 5.00%) 📚 McKinsey & Co (Koller, Goedhart, Wessels) (2020) — Wiley (textbook)
📝 名目4-5%。実質GDP 2.5-3% + インフレ 2%。
原文の引用を表示
"Long-run nominal GDP growth (~4.5%) is the typical anchor for terminal growth in mature large-cap firms."
成熟企業のTV成長率 valuation/tv_growth_typical_mature · 日本株 確信度: 高
日本株におけるターミナル成長率は2.50% (2.00% 〜 3.00%)
📊 値: 2.50% (2.00% 〜 3.00%) 📚 McKinsey & Co (Koller, Goedhart, Wessels) (2020) — Wiley (textbook)
📝 日本固有: 名目GDP低いためTV成長率は2-3%が現実的。
原文の引用を表示
"For Japan-specific context, low nominal GDP (1-2.5%) implies lower terminal growth than US (3-4%)."
成熟企業のTV成長率 valuation/tv_growth_typical_mature · 日本の化学業界 確信度: 中
日本の化学業界におけるターミナル成長率は2.50% (2.00% 〜 3.00%)
📊 値: 2.50% (2.00% 〜 3.00%) 🗓 2024 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2024) — NYU Stern (online dataset, updated annually)
📝 日本化学業のTV成長率proxy 2.5%(Damodaran 2024)。
原文の引用を表示
"Japan chemicals sector terminal growth proxy from Damodaran industry data."

業績悪化・下落 distress

配当カット・大幅下落後のリターン分布。
壊滅的下落の生涯確率 distress/catastrophic_loss_rate · Russell 3000(生涯) 確信度: 高
Russell 3000(生涯)は一生のうち40.0% (35.0% 〜 45.0%)の確率で壊滅的下落
📊 値: 40.0% (35.0% 〜 45.0%) 📐 n=13000 🗓 1980-2014 📚 JPMorgan Private Bank (Michael Cembalest) (2014) — Eye on the Market
📝 Russell 3000の40%が壊滅的下落から回復せず。
原文の引用を表示
"40% of Russell 3000 stocks experienced catastrophic loss (>70% peak decline never recovered) over 1980-2014."
distress/distance_to_default_hazard distress/distance_to_default_hazard · industrial_public_equity 確信度: 高
industrial_public_equityにおけるdistress/distance_to_default_hazard: 1
📊 値: 1 📐 n=390000 🗓 1980-2004 📚 Darrell Duffie; Leandro Saita; Ke Wang (2007) — Journal of Financial Economics 83(3)
📝 Use leverage adjusted by equity volatility and recent return as a distress probability prior; avoid treating accounting profit alone as sufficient.
原文の引用を表示
"Duffie-Saita-Wang default probabilities depend on distance to default, trailing stock return, market returns, and interest rates."
配当カット後の運命 distress/dividend_cut_outcomes · 配当カット後3年 確信度: 高
配当カット後3年における観測値: 80.0% (75.0% 〜 85.0%)
📊 値: 80.0% (75.0% 〜 85.0%) 🗓 1990-2008 📚 Charles Hsu & Linda Myers (2010) — The Accounting Review
📝 減配後3年: 80%超が市場アンダーパフォーム。
原文の引用を表示
"After a dividend cut, 80%+ of firms underperform the market over the subsequent 3 years."
配当カット後の運命 distress/dividend_cut_outcomes · 配当カット後ピーク回復 確信度: 高
配当カット後ピーク回復における観測値: 20.0% (15.0% 〜 25.0%)
📊 値: 20.0% (15.0% 〜 25.0%) 🗓 1980-1985 📚 Harry DeAngelo & Linda DeAngelo (1990) — Journal of Finance 45(5)
📝 減配後の前ピーク復帰率は20%未満。
原文の引用を表示
"Post dividend-cut, less than 20% of firms achieve recovery to prior peak performance."
配当カット後の運命 distress/dividend_cut_outcomes · 配当カット直後 確信度: 高
配当カット直後における観測値: -10.00% (-15.00% 〜 -5.00%)
📊 値: -10.00% (-15.00% 〜 -5.00%) 🗓 1990-2008 📚 Charles Hsu & Linda Myers (2010) — The Accounting Review
📝 減配後3年累計リターン中央値 −10%。
原文の引用を表示
"Median 3-year cumulative return post dividend cut is approximately -10%."
distress/equity_wipeout_restructuring distress/equity_wipeout_restructuring · JP・high_debt_equity(jp_high_debt_equity) 確信度: 高
JP・high_debt_equity(jp_high_debt_equity)におけるdistress/equity_wipeout_restructuring: 1
📊 値: 1 🗓 2010 📚 OECD / Japan Fair Trade Commission (2014) — OECD Competition Committee
📝 Use as a shareholder-wipeout mechanism: company may survive after restructuring while old equity goes to near zero.
原文の引用を表示
"JAL revitalization executed debt forgiveness and a 100% capital reduction of existing shares."
distress/going_concern_default_rate distress/going_concern_default_rate · 米国・listed_with_gc_opinion(us_listed_with_gc_opinion) 確信度: 高
米国・listed_with_gc_opinion(us_listed_with_gc_opinion)におけるdistress/going_concern_default_rate: 0.225 (0.2 〜 0.25)
📊 値: 0.225 (0.2 〜 0.25) 🗓 1991-2014 📚 Marshall A. Geiger, K. Raghunandan, Dasaratha V. Rama (2014) — Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (multiple papers, 1999-2014)
📝 GC意見後の累積倒産率は20-25%。GC意見は重要なリスクシグナル。
原文の引用を表示
"Geiger et al.: 20-25% of firms receiving going-concern modified audit opinion subsequently file Chapter 11 within 8 years."
distress/going_concern_default_rate distress/going_concern_default_rate · 米国・listed_with_gc_opinion(us_listed_with_gc_opinion) 確信度: 中
米国・listed_with_gc_opinion(us_listed_with_gc_opinion)におけるdistress/going_concern_default_rate: 0.38 (0.2 〜 0.56)
📊 値: 0.38 (0.2 〜 0.56) 🗓 1992-2018 📚 Marshall A. Geiger, K. Raghunandan, Dasaratha V. Rama (2014) — Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (multiple papers, 1999-2014)
📝 ハザード比換算。1年precise probabilityはベース倒産率(<1%)に乗算で上昇。
原文の引用を表示
"Geiger/Alexeyeva summary: GC opinion issuance associated with 20-56% higher probability of bankruptcy in subsequent year vs control."
distress/going_concern_default_rate distress/going_concern_default_rate · 米国・listed_subsequently_bankrupt(us_listed_subsequently_bankrupt) 確信度: 高
米国・listed_subsequently_bankrupt(us_listed_subsequently_bankrupt)におけるdistress/going_concern_default_rate: 0.5 (0.45 〜 0.71)
📊 値: 0.5 (0.45 〜 0.71) 🗓 1991-2010 📚 Marshall A. Geiger, K. Raghunandan, Dasaratha V. Rama (2014) — Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (multiple papers, 1999-2014)
📝 GC意見は半数の倒産銘柄を事前検出。残り半数は無警告で破綻。
原文の引用を表示
"Geiger et al.: ~50% of bankrupt firms had GC opinion prior to filing in normal periods; ~71% during financial crisis (2008-2009)."
distress/hazard_market_variables distress/hazard_market_variables · 米国・public(us_public) 確信度: 高
米国・public(us_public)におけるdistress/hazard_market_variables: 定性所見
🗓 US exchange-listed firms 📚 Tyler Shumway (2001) — Journal of Business
📝 Use price momentum and volatility as distress-risk multipliers where market data exists. future_box_v0.9_research_seed
原文の引用を表示
"Bankruptcy forecasts improve when market size, past stock returns, and return volatility are added to accounting variables."
distress/hazard_return_volatility_direction distress/hazard_return_volatility_direction · 米国・public(us_public) 確信度: 高
米国・public(us_public)におけるdistress/hazard_return_volatility_direction: 1 (1 〜 1)
📊 値: 1 (1 〜 1) 🗓 US listed firms 📚 John Y. Campbell; Jens Hilscher; Jan Szilagyi (2008) — Journal of Finance
📝 Directional prior only; use with trailing return and volatility. future_box_v0.9_research_seed
原文の引用を表示
"Poor recent returns and high equity volatility are associated with higher failure probability."
distress/hazard_size_direction distress/hazard_size_direction · 米国・public(us_public) 確信度: 高
米国・public(us_public)におけるdistress/hazard_size_direction: -1 (-1 〜 -1)
📊 値: -1 (-1 〜 -1) 🗓 US listed firms 📚 John Y. Campbell; Jens Hilscher; Jan Szilagyi (2008) — Journal of Finance
📝 Directional prior only; calibrated locally by market-cap buckets in the MC engine. future_box_v0.9_research_seed
原文の引用を表示
"Lower market capitalization is associated with higher failure probability after controlling for other distress variables."
distress/hazard_total_liabilities_assets distress/hazard_total_liabilities_assets · public_equity 確信度: 中
public_equityにおけるdistress/hazard_total_liabilities_assets: 1
📊 値: 1 🗓 1970s 📚 James A. Ohlson (1980) — Journal of Accounting Research 18(1)
📝 Use debt-heavy balance sheets as a probability modifier, not a standalone valuation model.
原文の引用を表示
"Ohlson bankruptcy prediction uses total liabilities / total assets among accounting distress variables."
distress/hazard_total_liabilities_market_assets distress/hazard_total_liabilities_market_assets · public_equity 確信度: 高
public_equityにおけるdistress/hazard_total_liabilities_market_assets: 1
📊 値: 1 🗓 1963-2003 📚 John Y. Campbell; Jens Hilscher; Jan Szilagyi (2008) — Journal of Finance 63(6)
📝 Higher liability burden relative to market-valued assets should raise distress and shareholder impairment probability.
原文の引用を表示
"CHS distress models include leverage/market-value balance-sheet pressure alongside profitability, size, returns, and volatility."
distress/naive_merton_hazard_inputs distress/naive_merton_hazard_inputs · public_equity 確信度: 高
public_equityにおけるdistress/naive_merton_hazard_inputs: 1
📊 値: 1 🗓 1980s-2000s 📚 Sreedhar T. Bharath; Tyler Shumway (2008) — Review of Financial Studies 21(3)
📝 Use market leverage, volatility, and return direction as practical modifiers rather than relying on a pure structural default probability.
原文の引用を表示
"Bharath-Shumway find Merton functional-form inputs useful, while expanded hazard variables improve forecasts."
大幅下落後のピーク回復 distress/peak_recovery_post_drawdown · 大幅下落 確信度: 高
大幅下落における回復パターン(定性)
🗓 1926-2016 📚 Hendrik Bessembinder (2018) — Journal of Financial Economics 129(3)
📝 個別株生涯リターン分布は強い右尾偏倚。多数は大幅下落後ピークに戻らない。
原文の引用を表示
"The lifetime distribution of stock returns is heavily right-skewed; most stocks never reach prior highs after large drawdowns."
distress/stable_electronics_interim_loss_rate distress/stable_electronics_interim_loss_rate · electronics_stable_positive10 確信度: 中
electronics_stable_positive10におけるdistress/stable_electronics_interim_loss_rate: 20.0%
📊 値: 20.0% 📐 n=105 🗓 internal windows ending before 10y forward observation 📚 Kabufu diagnostics (2026) — research.db internal historical cohort study
📝 Use as guard against eliminating downside tail; do not force all stable electronics paths positive.
原文の引用を表示
"Internal Japanese electronics cohort: 10-year forward minimum net margin was below zero in 21/105 windows (20.0%), so interim loss tails should remain possible."
distress/stable_electronics_terminal_loss_rate distress/stable_electronics_terminal_loss_rate · electronics_stable_positive10 確信度: 中
electronics_stable_positive10におけるdistress/stable_electronics_terminal_loss_rate: 2.9%
📊 値: 2.9% 📐 n=105 🗓 internal windows ending before 10y forward observation 📚 Kabufu diagnostics (2026) — research.db internal historical cohort study
📝 Eligibility: electronics_consumer/electrical_equipment/electronic_components, 10/10 recent EPS and net margins positive, equity ratio >=30%.
原文の引用を表示
"Internal Japanese electronics cohort: 105 qualifying windows, 25 tickers; terminal net margin below zero in 3/105 windows (2.9%)."
distress/stable_electronics_terminal_margin_p10 distress/stable_electronics_terminal_margin_p10 · electronics_stable_positive10 確信度: 中
electronics_stable_positive10におけるdistress/stable_electronics_terminal_margin_p10: 0.0383
📊 値: 0.0383 📐 n=105 🗓 internal windows ending before 10y forward observation 📚 Kabufu diagnostics (2026) — research.db internal historical cohort study
📝 Supports reducing permanent terminal-loss persistence for stable incumbents while keeping shock/default paths.
原文の引用を表示
"Internal Japanese electronics cohort: 10-year terminal net-margin p10 was about +3.8%; p05 about +2.0%."
distress/zombie_5y_outcomes distress/zombie_5y_outcomes · グローバル・listed_zombies_lifetime(global_listed_zombies_lifetime) 確信度: 高
グローバル・listed_zombies_lifetime(global_listed_zombies_lifetime)におけるdistress/zombie_5y_outcomes: 0.6 (0.55 〜 0.65)
📊 値: 0.6 (0.55 〜 0.65) 🗓 1985-2017 📚 Ryan Banerjee, Boris Hofmann (2022) — Economic Policy 37(112), and BIS Working Paper No 882
📝 ゾンビからの回復は60%だが、回復企業も生涯productivityが低位。Recover but underperform clean firms with relapse risk.
原文の引用を表示
"Banerjee-Hofmann 2022: ~60% of zombies eventually exit zombie status (recovered, often incomplete); ~25% exit market (bankruptcy/M&A)."
distress/zombie_5y_outcomes distress/zombie_5y_outcomes · グローバル・listed_zombies_lifetime(global_listed_zombies_lifetime) 確信度: 高
グローバル・listed_zombies_lifetime(global_listed_zombies_lifetime)におけるdistress/zombie_5y_outcomes: 0.25 (0.2 〜 0.3)
📊 値: 0.25 (0.2 〜 0.3) 🗓 1985-2017 📚 Ryan Banerjee, Boris Hofmann (2022) — Economic Policy 37(112), and BIS Working Paper No 882
📝 Exit=破綻 or M&A消滅。残り約15%が長期ゾンビ継続。
原文の引用を表示
"Banerjee-Hofmann 2022: ~25% of zombies exit market (bankruptcy or absorption). Remaining ~15% stay zombie indefinitely."
distress/zombie_median_duration_years distress/zombie_median_duration_years · グローバル・listed_zombies(global_listed_zombies) 確信度: 高
グローバル・listed_zombies(global_listed_zombies)におけるdistress/zombie_median_duration_years: 7.0年 (6.0年 〜 8.0年)
📊 値: 7.0年 (6.0年 〜 8.0年) 🗓 1985-2017 📚 Ryan Banerjee, Boris Hofmann (2022) — Economic Policy 37(112), and BIS Working Paper No 882
📝 7年は長期ホールド前提モデルでは無視できない。
原文の引用を表示
"Banerjee-Hofmann 2022: median zombie firm remains in zombie state for ~7 years before recovery or exit."
distress/zombie_persistence distress/zombie_persistence · グローバル・listed_zombies(global_listed_zombies) 確信度: 高
グローバル・listed_zombies(global_listed_zombies)におけるdistress/zombie_persistence: 0.6 (0.55 〜 0.65)
📊 値: 0.6 (0.55 〜 0.65) 🗓 1985-2017 📚 Ryan Banerjee, Boris Hofmann (2022) — Economic Policy 37(112), and BIS Working Paper No 882
📝 年遷移60%維持。長期残留が常態。
原文の引用を表示
"Banerjee-Hofmann 2022 BIS WP882: in early 2000s, a zombie firm has ~60% chance of remaining zombie next year."
distress/zombie_share_jp distress/zombie_share_jp · JP・listed_manufacturing_construction_realestate_retail_wholesale_service(jp_listed_manufacturing_construction_realestate_retail_wholesale_service) 確信度: 高
JP・listed_manufacturing_construction_realestate_retail_wholesale_service(jp_listed_manufacturing_construction_realestate_retail_wholesale_service)におけるdistress/zombie_share_jp: 0.3 (0.25 〜 0.3)
📊 値: 0.3 (0.25 〜 0.3) 🗓 1994-2002 📚 Ricardo Caballero, Takeo Hoshi, Anil Kashyap (2008) — American Economic Review
📝 日本の「失われた30年」のピーク時のゾンビ比率。
原文の引用を表示
"Caballero-Hoshi-Kashyap 2008: zombie share rose from 5-15% (pre-1993) to >25% post-1994; ~30% of public firms in distress sectors were on bank life support early-2000s."

信用格付 credit_rating

格付別CoE上乗せ・年次デフォルト率・回収率。
格付別の資本コスト上乗せ幅 credit_rating/coe_premium · 格付AAA 確信度: 高
格付AAAには基準CoEに0.00% (-0.50% 〜 0.50%)を加算
📊 値: 0.00% (-0.50% 〜 0.50%) 🗓 2024 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2024) — NYU Stern (online dataset, updated annually)
📝 AAA格はCoE上乗せほぼゼロ。
原文の引用を表示
"AAA-rated firm CoE adjustment: approximately zero (lowest credit risk)."
格付別の資本コスト上乗せ幅 credit_rating/coe_premium · 格付A 確信度: 高
格付Aには基準CoEに0.50% (0.30% 〜 0.80%)を加算
📊 値: 0.50% (0.30% 〜 0.80%) 🗓 2024 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2024) — NYU Stern (online dataset, updated annually)
📝 A格はCoE +50bp。
原文の引用を表示
"A-rated firm CoE adjustment: +50bp."
格付別の資本コスト上乗せ幅 credit_rating/coe_premium · 格付BBB 確信度: 高
格付BBBには基準CoEに1.50% (1.00% 〜 2.00%)を加算
📊 値: 1.50% (1.00% 〜 2.00%) 🗓 2024 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2024) — NYU Stern (online dataset, updated annually)
📝 BBB格はCoE +150bp。
原文の引用を表示
"BBB-rated firm CoE adjustment: +150bp."
格付別の資本コスト上乗せ幅 credit_rating/coe_premium · 格付BB以下 確信度: 高
格付BB以下には基準CoEに4.00% (3.00% 〜 6.00%)を加算
📊 値: 4.00% (3.00% 〜 6.00%) 🗓 2024 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2024) — NYU Stern (online dataset, updated annually)
📝 BB格以下はCoE +400bp以上。
原文の引用を表示
"BB or lower rated firm CoE adjustment: +400bp or more."
年次デフォルト確率 credit_rating/default_rate · 格付AAA 確信度: 高
格付AAAは1年間で0.0% (0.0% 〜 0.0%)の確率でデフォルト
📊 値: 0.0% (0.0% 〜 0.0%) 🗓 1920-2023 📚 Moodys Investors Service (2024) — Annual Default Report
📝 AAA格の年次倒産率0.01%(極めて低い)。
原文の引用を表示
"Aaa-rated firms have annual default rate of approximately 0.01%."
年次デフォルト確率 credit_rating/default_rate · 格付AA 確信度: 高
格付AAは1年間で0.1% (0.1% 〜 0.2%)の確率でデフォルト
📊 値: 0.1% (0.1% 〜 0.2%) 🗓 1920-2023 📚 Moodys Investors Service (2024) — Annual Default Report
📝 AA格の年次倒産率0.1%。
原文の引用を表示
"Aa-rated firms: annual default rate ~0.1%."
年次デフォルト確率 credit_rating/default_rate · 格付A 確信度: 高
格付Aは1年間で0.5% (0.3% 〜 0.8%)の確率でデフォルト
📊 値: 0.5% (0.3% 〜 0.8%) 🗓 1920-2023 📚 Moodys Investors Service (2024) — Annual Default Report
📝 A格の年次倒産率0.5%。
原文の引用を表示
"A-rated firms: annual default rate ~0.5%."
年次デフォルト確率 credit_rating/default_rate · 格付BBB 確信度: 高
格付BBBは1年間で2.0% (1.5% 〜 2.5%)の確率でデフォルト
📊 値: 2.0% (1.5% 〜 2.5%) 🗓 1920-2023 📚 Moodys Investors Service (2024) — Annual Default Report
📝 BBB格の年次倒産率2%(投資適格の下限)。
原文の引用を表示
"Baa-rated firms: annual default rate ~2%."
年次デフォルト確率 credit_rating/default_rate · 格付BB 確信度: 高
格付BBは1年間で6.0% (4.0% 〜 8.0%)の確率でデフォルト
📊 値: 6.0% (4.0% 〜 8.0%) 🗓 1920-2023 📚 Moodys Investors Service (2024) — Annual Default Report
📝 BB格の年次倒産率6%(投機級始まり)。
原文の引用を表示
"Ba-rated firms: annual default rate ~6%."
年次デフォルト確率 credit_rating/default_rate · 格付CCC以下 確信度: 高
格付CCC以下は1年間で18.0% (14.0% 〜 22.0%)の確率でデフォルト
📊 値: 18.0% (14.0% 〜 22.0%) 🗓 1920-2023 📚 Moodys Investors Service (2024) — Annual Default Report
📝 CCC格以下の年次倒産率18%(高リスク)。
原文の引用を表示
"Caa or lower rated firms: annual default rate ~18%."
デフォルト時の回収率 credit_rating/recovery_rate · 無担保シニア債 確信度: 高
無担保シニア債は元本のうち40.0% (30.0% 〜 50.0%)が回収される
📊 値: 40.0% (30.0% 〜 50.0%) 🗓 1987-2023 📚 S&P Global Ratings (2024) — Annual Default Report
📝 無担保シニア債のデフォルト時平均回収率40%。
原文の引用を表示
"Senior unsecured bond recovery rate after default averages 40%."
デフォルト時の回収率 credit_rating/recovery_rate · 有担保シニア債 確信度: 高
有担保シニア債は元本のうち65.0% (55.0% 〜 75.0%)が回収される
📊 値: 65.0% (55.0% 〜 75.0%) 🗓 1987-2023 📚 S&P Global Ratings (2024) — Annual Default Report
📝 有担保シニア債回収率65%。
原文の引用を表示
"Senior secured debt recovery rate averages 65%."
デフォルト時の回収率 credit_rating/recovery_rate · 普通株 確信度: 高
普通株は元本のうち5.0% (0.0% 〜 15.0%)が回収される
📊 値: 5.0% (0.0% 〜 15.0%) 🗓 1987-2023 📚 S&P Global Ratings (2024) — Annual Default Report
📝 株式の倒産時回収はほぼゼロ。
原文の引用を表示
"Common equity recovery in default cases is typically near zero."
高品質銘柄の超過リターン credit_rating/return_statistics · 高品質 確信度: 高
高品質は年4.50% (3.00% 〜 6.00%)の超過リターン
📊 値: 4.50% (3.00% 〜 6.00%) 🗓 1956-2017 📚 Cliff Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Lasse Pedersen (2019) — Financial Analysts Journal 75(2)
📝 高クオリティ企業(低借入・利益安定)は年率4-5%の超過リターン。
原文の引用を表示
"Quality (low debt, stable earnings) firms generate ~4-5% annual excess return long-term."

市場構造 market_microstructure

企業寿命・銘柄生涯リターン。
企業の平均寿命 market_microstructure/corporate_lifespan · S&P500(2012) 確信度: 高
S&P500(2012)は18.0年 (15.0年 〜 22.0年)でリスト落ち/合併
📊 値: 18.0年 (15.0年 〜 22.0年) 🗓 2012 📚 Richard Foster & Sarah Kaplan (2001) — McKinsey/Doubleday (book)
📝 S&P500構成銘柄寿命中央値2012年=18年(1958年61年から短縮)。
原文の引用を表示
"S&P 500 average member lifespan dropped to ~18 years by 2012."
market_microstructure/firm_size_growth_deceleration market_microstructure/firm_size_growth_deceleration · 米国・smallest_decile(us_smallest_decile) 確信度: 高
米国・smallest_decile(us_smallest_decile)におけるmarket_microstructure/firm_size_growth_deceleration: 42.4 (40 〜 45)
📊 値: 42.4 (40 〜 45) 📐 n=29754 🗓 1926-2025 📚 Hendrik Bessembinder (2025) — SSRN Working Paper
📝 Smallest decile = high failure rate; largest decile = high persistence of positive return. Size protects but constrains growth ceiling.
原文の引用を表示
"Bessembinder "One Hundred Years in U.S. Stock Markets" (2025): "Only 42.4% of stocks in the smallest decile achieved positive decade-long returns, compared to 81.3% in the largest decile." Sample 29,754 stocks 1926-2025."
market_microstructure/firm_size_growth_deceleration market_microstructure/firm_size_growth_deceleration · 米国・largest_decile(us_largest_decile) 確信度: 高
米国・largest_decile(us_largest_decile)におけるmarket_microstructure/firm_size_growth_deceleration: 81.3 (79 〜 83)
📊 値: 81.3 (79 〜 83) 📐 n=29754 🗓 1926-2025 📚 Hendrik Bessembinder (2025) — SSRN Working Paper
📝 Pair with F23.
原文の引用を表示
"Bessembinder (2025): largest decile 81.3% positive 10-year buy-and-hold returns."
market_microstructure/large_cap_growth_constraint market_microstructure/large_cap_growth_constraint · european_large_firms 確信度: 高
european_large_firmsにおけるmarket_microstructure/large_cap_growth_constraint: 定性所見
🗓 1980-2000 📚 Paul A. Geroski; Klaus P. Gugler (2004) — CEPR Discussion Paper / Oxford Economic Papers
📝 大型株は size と growth が独立 (Gibrat) → 高成長フェードが平均的にゆっくり。中小型は強いmean reversion。
原文の引用を表示
"Geroski & Gugler "Corporate Growth Convergence in Europe" (2004): "A Gibrat process best describes the growth of very large and mature firms; but smaller and younger firms depart from this prediction... Hart and Oulton (1996) consider a large sample of UK firms and find that, whilst mean reversion is observed in the pooled data, a decomposition of the sample according to size classes reveals essentially no relation between size and growth for the larger firms.""
market_microstructure/large_cap_growth_constraint market_microstructure/large_cap_growth_constraint · 全銘柄 確信度: 高
全銘柄におけるmarket_microstructure/large_cap_growth_constraint: 定性所見
📚 Aswath Damodaran (2018) — FT Press (book)
📝 TV growth ≤ economy growth (実経済成長率+インフレ)。日本の場合 nominal GDP ~1-2%。
原文の引用を表示
"Damodaran "The Stable Growth Rate" / "Limits of Growth": "The stable growth rate cannot exceed the growth rate of the economy in which a firm operates... a ten-fold increase in revenues is entirely feasible for a firm with revenues of $2 million but unlikely for a firm with revenues of $2 billion.""
銘柄の生涯リターン分布 market_microstructure/stock_lifetime_returns · 米国株(生涯) 確信度: 高
米国株(生涯)における観測値: 58.0% (55.0% 〜 61.0%)
📊 値: 58.0% (55.0% 〜 61.0%) 📐 n=25000 🗓 1926-2016 📚 Hendrik Bessembinder (2018) — Journal of Financial Economics 129(3)
📝 米国株の58%が国債未満。中央値<平均値の極端ロングテール分布。
原文の引用を表示
"58% of US stocks underperform 1-month T-bills over their lifetime."
銘柄の生涯リターン分布 market_microstructure/stock_lifetime_returns · 米国株(生涯) 確信度: 高
米国株(生涯)における観測値: 4.0% (3.0% 〜 5.0%)
📊 値: 4.0% (3.0% 〜 5.0%) 📐 n=25000 🗓 1926-2016 📚 Hendrik Bessembinder (2018) — Journal of Financial Economics 129(3)
📝 4%の銘柄が全市場の超過リターンを生む。
原文の引用を表示
"Just 4% of stocks generated all $35 trillion of net wealth in US market 1926-2016."
銘柄の生涯リターン分布 market_microstructure/stock_lifetime_returns · Share of stocks whose lifetime buy-and-hold return is below 1-month T-bill 確信度: 高
Share of stocks whose lifetime buy-and-hold return is below 1-month T-billにおける観測値: 0.574
📊 値: 0.574 📐 n=64000 🗓 1990-2020 📚 Hendrik Bessembinder (2018) — Journal of Financial Economics 129(3)
📝 Global update of Bessembinder 2018. Reinforces that majority of equities deliver negative excess returns over their lifetime - many because they lose competitive position. Use to calibrate baseline distribution of lifetime cumulative returns for the simulation.
原文の引用を表示
"The majority, 55.2% of U.S. stocks and 57.4% of non-U.S. stocks, underperform one-month U.S. Treasury bills in terms of compound returns over the full sample. (Bessembinder et al., Long-Term Shareholder Returns: Evidence from 64,000 Global Stocks, FAJ 2023.)"

予測バイアス bias

アナリスト・経営陣の楽観バイアス。
bias/analyst_herding bias/analyst_herding · 米国・analyst_forecasts(us_analyst_forecasts) 確信度: 高
米国・analyst_forecasts(us_analyst_forecasts)におけるbias/analyst_herding: 0.075 (0.05 〜 0.1)
📊 値: 0.075 (0.05 〜 0.1) 📐 n=13379 🗓 1989-1998 📚 Clement, M.; Tse, S. (2005) — Journal of Finance 60(1)
📝 コンセンサスから離れる予測の方が精度高い。Anti-herd値。
原文の引用を表示
"Bold (anti-herding) analyst forecasts have 5-10% lower mean absolute forecast error than herding forecasts; bold forecasts more accurate even controlling for analyst experience."
bias/analyst_herding bias/analyst_herding · 米国・analyst_forecasts(us_analyst_forecasts) 確信度: 中
米国・analyst_forecasts(us_analyst_forecasts)におけるbias/analyst_herding: 0.08 (0.05 〜 0.12)
📊 値: 0.08 (0.05 〜 0.12) 🗓 1980-1995 📚 Mikhail, M.; Walther, B.; Willis, R. (1997) — Journal of Accounting Research 35 (Supplement)
📝 ベテラン (firm-specific exp) 精度↑。
原文の引用を表示
"Each additional 5 years of firm-specific analyst experience reduces mean absolute forecast error by ~5-12%; general experience much weaker."
アナリスト長期成長予想の楽観バイアス bias/analyst_lt_optimism · 全銘柄 確信度: 高
全銘柄でアナリストは長期成長率を5.00% (4.00% 〜 7.00%)ほど高めに見積もる傾向
📊 値: 5.00% (4.00% 〜 7.00%) 🗓 1984-2008 📚 Mark Bradshaw, Michael Drake, James Myers, Linda Myers (2012) — Review of Accounting Studies 17(4)
📝 アナリスト長期EPS予想は中央値+5ppの楽観バイアス。
原文の引用を表示
"Analyst long-term EPS forecasts exhibit median +5pp optimistic bias vs realized outcomes."
高成長外挿バイアス bias/high_growth_extrapolation · 過去高成長銘柄 確信度: 高
過去高成長銘柄は過去の高成長を将来に過度に外挿する傾向(定性)
🗓 1951-1998 📚 Louis Chan, Jason Karceski, Josef Lakonishok (2003) — Journal of Finance 58(2)
📝 投資家・アナリストとも過去高成長を将来投影しすぎる。
原文の引用を表示
"Investors and analysts systematically extrapolate past high earnings growth into the future, despite weak persistence."
経営陣の業績見通し楽観バイアス bias/management_forecast_optimism · 全銘柄 確信度: 中
全銘柄で経営陣は10.00% (5.00% 〜 15.00%)ほど楽観に振れる
📊 値: 10.00% (5.00% 〜 15.00%) 🗓 1990-2018 📚 McKinsey & Co (Koller, Goedhart, Wessels) (2020) — Wiley (textbook)
📝 会社業績予想は5-15ppの楽観バイアス。
原文の引用を表示
"Management forecasts of long-term growth show systematic optimism averaging 5-15pp over realized."
bias/management_sandbagging bias/management_sandbagging · 米国・listed_guiders(us_listed_guiders) 確信度: 高
米国・listed_guiders(us_listed_guiders)におけるbias/management_sandbagging: 0.7 (0.65 〜 0.78)
📊 値: 0.7 (0.65 〜 0.78) 📐 n=1947 🗓 1995-2001 📚 Cotter, J.; Tuna, I.; Wysocki, P. (2006) — Contemporary Accounting Research 23(3)
📝 会社予想サンドバッギング。70% beat ratio.
原文の引用を表示
"Approximately 70% of firms that issue earnings guidance meet or beat the guided number, vs ~50% for non-guiders; consistent with management walking analyst forecasts down (sandbagging)."
bias/sbc_dilution_drag bias/sbc_dilution_drag · 米国上場銘柄 確信度: 高
米国上場銘柄におけるbias/sbc_dilution_drag: 0.04 (0.02 〜 0.06)
📊 値: 0.04 (0.02 〜 0.06) 📐 n=7507 🗓 1993-2001 📚 Bergstresser, D.; Philippon, T. (2006) — Journal of Financial Economics 80(3)
📝 高SBC CEOほど accruals 操作 → reversion で低リターン。
原文の引用を表示
"CEOs in highest equity-incentive decile use discretionary accruals 2-6 percentage points larger than lowest decile; subsequent stock returns lower as accruals reverse."
bias/sbc_dilution_drag bias/sbc_dilution_drag · 米国・high_sbc_tech(us_high_sbc_tech) 確信度: 高
米国・high_sbc_tech(us_high_sbc_tech)におけるbias/sbc_dilution_drag: 0.05 (0.03 〜 0.08)
📊 値: 0.05 (0.03 〜 0.08) 🗓 1996-2000 📚 Bens, D.; Nagar, V.; Skinner, D.; Wong, M. (2003) — Journal of Accounting and Economics 36(1-3)
📝 SBC希薄化 EPS 5%/yr。テック高SBCで顕著。
原文の引用を表示
"High-SBC technology firms experience 3-8% annual EPS dilution from option grants; firms repurchase to offset, but operating cash flow burden persists."

予測精度 forecast_accuracy

EPS・売上・マクロ予測の系統的誤差。
EPS 5年予想の誤差 forecast_accuracy/eps_5y_forecast_error · 全銘柄 確信度: 高
全銘柄でEPS予想は5.00% (3.00% 〜 8.00%)ほど楽観に偏る
📊 値: 5.00% (3.00% 〜 8.00%) 🗓 1984-2008 📚 Mark Bradshaw, Michael Drake, James Myers, Linda Myers (2012) — Review of Accounting Studies 17(4)
📝 5年EPS予測の中央値乖離: 実績比+5pp楽観。
原文の引用を表示
"Median 5-year EPS forecast vs realized: +5pp optimistic."
EPS 5年予想の誤差 forecast_accuracy/eps_5y_forecast_error · 投資家期待 確信度: 高
投資家期待でEPS予想は定性所見ほど楽観に偏る
🗓 1963-2011 📚 Robin Greenwood & Andrei Shleifer (2014) — Review of Financial Studies 27(3)
📝 投資家期待と実現リターンは負相関。期待形成は行動学的バイアスを含む。
原文の引用を表示
"Investor expected returns and realized returns are negatively correlated; expectations form behaviorally, not rationally."
不況の過小予測 forecast_accuracy/recession_underprediction · マクロ予測 確信度: 高
マクロ予測における予測の限界(定性)
🗓 1872-2005 📚 Ivo Welch & Amit Goyal (2008) — Review of Financial Studies 21(4)
📝 マクロ予測は景気後退転換点を予測できない。コンセンサスは下方転換を体系的に見逃す。
原文の引用を表示
"Macroeconomic predictors fail to capture recession turning points; consensus forecasts systematically miss downturns."
売上予想の楽観バイアス forecast_accuracy/sales_forecast_bias · 全銘柄 確信度: 高
全銘柄で売上予想は3.00% (2.00% 〜 5.00%)ほど楽観に偏る
📊 値: 3.00% (2.00% 〜 5.00%) 🗓 1990-2018 📚 McKinsey & Co (Koller, Goedhart, Wessels) (2020) — Wiley (textbook)
📝 長期売上予測は2-5pp過大評価。
原文の引用を表示
"Long-term sales forecasts overestimate by 2-5pp."

ファクタープレミアム discount_rate_research

サイズ・流動性・クオリティの長期超過リターン。
企業規模プレミアム discount_rate_research/firm_size_premium · 米国小型株 確信度: 高
米国小型株は年2.00% (1.00% 〜 3.00%)の超過リターン(小型株効果)
📊 値: 2.00% (1.00% 〜 3.00%) 🗓 1936-1975 📚 Rolf Banz (1981) — Journal of Financial Economics 9(1)
📝 小型株プレミアム: 米国年率約2%。
原文の引用を表示
"Small-cap US stocks generate ~2% annual excess return vs large-cap."
非流動性プレミアム discount_rate_research/illiquidity_premium · 流動性低 確信度: 高
流動性低は年3.00% (2.00% 〜 4.00%)の超過リターン
📊 値: 3.00% (2.00% 〜 4.00%) 🗓 1964-1997 📚 Yakov Amihud (2002) — Journal of Financial Markets 5(1)
📝 流動性プレミアム: 年率2-4%超過リターン。
原文の引用を表示
"Illiquid stocks generate 2-4% annual excess return."
クオリティ・プレミアム discount_rate_research/quality_premium · QMJファクター 確信度: 高
QMJファクターは年4.50% (3.50% 〜 5.50%)の超過リターン (QMJファクター)
📊 値: 4.50% (3.50% 〜 5.50%) 🗓 1956-2017 📚 Cliff Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Lasse Pedersen (2019) — Financial Analysts Journal 75(2)
📝 クオリティファクター: 年率4-5%。
原文の引用を表示
"Quality-minus-Junk (QMJ) factor: 4-5% annual excess return."
βデシル別実現リターン discount_rate_research/realized_returns_by_decile · βデシル(米) 確信度: 高
βデシル(米)における観測パターン(定性)
🗓 1926-2012 📚 Andrea Frazzini & Lasse Pedersen (2014) — Journal of Financial Economics 111(1)
📝 低ベータ株が高ベータ株より高シャープ。CAPMと逆相関。
原文の引用を表示
"Low-beta stocks earn higher Sharpe ratios than high-beta stocks (CAPM violation)."

業種分類 industry

景気循環性・ライフサイクル・衰退分類。
industry/bank_growth_profile industry/bank_growth_profile · 米国・banks_regional(us_banks_regional) 確信度: 高
米国・banks_regional(us_banks_regional)におけるindustry/bank_growth_profile: 8.05 (7.5 〜 8.5)
📊 値: 8.05 (7.5 〜 8.5) 📐 n=568 🗓 2021-2026 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2026) — NYU Stern Data Library
📝 地銀: revenue CAGR 8%。金利上昇期間込み。長期は 3-5% に近づく見通し。
原文の引用を表示
"Damodaran NYU Stern (Jan 2026): Banks (Regional), 568 firms, 5y revenue CAGR 8.05%, NI CAGR 9.71%."
industry/beverage_growth_profile industry/beverage_growth_profile · 米国・beverage_soft(us_beverage_soft) 確信度: 高
米国・beverage_soft(us_beverage_soft)におけるindustry/beverage_growth_profile: 8.58 (8 〜 9)
📊 値: 8.58 (8 〜 9) 📐 n=27 🗓 2021-2026 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2026) — NYU Stern Data Library
📝 飲料: 5y revenue CAGR 8.6%。価格+ミックス効果でNI 18.8%。
原文の引用を表示
"Damodaran NYU Stern (Jan 2026): Beverage (Soft), 27 firms, 5y revenue CAGR 8.58%, NI CAGR 18.84%."
industry/biotech_growth_profile industry/biotech_growth_profile · 米国・drugs_biotech(us_drugs_biotech) 確信度: 高
米国・drugs_biotech(us_drugs_biotech)におけるindustry/biotech_growth_profile: 28.93 (28 〜 30)
📊 値: 28.93 (28 〜 30) 📐 n=496 🗓 2021-2026 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2026) — NYU Stern Data Library
📝 バイオ: revenue CAGR 高 (29%) だが NI CAGR は 17% 程度に留まる (損失企業多い)。
原文の引用を表示
"Damodaran NYU Stern (Jan 2026): Drugs (Biotechnology), 496 firms, 5y revenue CAGR 28.93%, 5y net income CAGR 17.08%."
業界の景気循環分類 industry/cyclicality_classification · 業種分類体系 確信度: 高
業種分類体系による業種分類(定性)
🗓 2024 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2024) — NYU Stern (online dataset, updated annually)
📝 セクター分類: cyclical(化学・素材・半導体・自動車・運輸)、defensive(食品・薬品・公益)、secular_decline(伝統電機・伝統小売・伝統メディア)。
原文の引用を表示
"Sectors classified by historical revenue volatility and recession sensitivity."
industry/food_beverage_growth_profile industry/food_beverage_growth_profile · グローバル・food_beverage(global_food_beverage) 確信度: 中
グローバル・food_beverage(global_food_beverage)におけるindustry/food_beverage_growth_profile: 4.5 (3 〜 6)
📊 値: 4.5 (3 〜 6) 🗓 2020-2031 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2026) — NYU Stern Data Library
📝 G食品飲料グローバル: 3-6% CAGR。日本ローカルは 0-1%。
原文の引用を表示
"Mordor Intelligence / Brand Finance / Nestle annual reports: Global Food & Beverage Market projected CAGR 3.75-5.9% through 2031. Nestle India 10y revenue CAGR 7.5%, EPS 10.5%. Nestle group ~3-5% organic growth target."
業界ライフサイクル位置 industry/lifecycle_position · 業種分類体系 確信度: 高
業種分類体系による業種ステージ判定(定性)
🗓 1957-2000 📚 Richard Foster & Sarah Kaplan (2001) — McKinsey/Doubleday (book)
📝 産業ライフサイクル: 導入・成長・成熟・衰退。位置でフェード動態が変わる。
原文の引用を表示
"Industries follow lifecycle: emergence, growth, maturity, decline. Position determines fade dynamics."
構造的衰退の判定指標 industry/secular_decline_indicators · 業種診断 確信度: 高
業種診断における警告サイン(定性)
📚 Clayton Christensen (1997) — Harvard Business Review Press (book)
📝 構造衰退指標: 技術代替・需要パターン変化・規制破壊・人口動態逆風。
原文の引用を表示
"Indicators of secular decline: technological substitution, demand pattern shift, regulatory disruption, demographic headwind."
industry/semiconductor_growth_profile industry/semiconductor_growth_profile · 米国・semiconductor(us_semiconductor) 確信度: 高
米国・semiconductor(us_semiconductor)におけるindustry/semiconductor_growth_profile: 11.18 (10.5 〜 12)
📊 値: 11.18 (10.5 〜 12) 📐 n=66 🗓 2021-2026 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2026) — NYU Stern Data Library
📝 半導体: 約 11% CAGR (シクリカル成長業)。AI需要を含む期間。
原文の引用を表示
"Damodaran NYU Stern (Jan 2026): Semiconductor, 66 firms, 5y revenue CAGR 11.18%, NI CAGR 11.19%."
industry/semiconductor_growth_profile industry/semiconductor_growth_profile · グローバル・semiconductor(global_semiconductor) 確信度: 高
グローバル・semiconductor(global_semiconductor)におけるindustry/semiconductor_growth_profile: 13 (11 〜 15)
📊 値: 13 (11 〜 15) 🗓 2005-2025 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2026) — NYU Stern Data Library
📝 長期 (20年) CAGR ~13%; 直近 5年 ~11%; 2030まで予測 6-8%。フェード傾向。
原文の引用を表示
"Multiple industry reports cited via SIA & McKinsey: "the current 20-year annual average growth of the semiconductor industry is on the order of 13%." McKinsey forecast 6-8% CAGR through 2030."
industry/software_growth_profile industry/software_growth_profile · 米国・software_sys_app(us_software_sys_app) 確信度: 高
米国・software_sys_app(us_software_sys_app)におけるindustry/software_growth_profile: 19.56 (19 〜 20)
📊 値: 19.56 (19 〜 20) 📐 n=309 🗓 2021-2026 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2026) — NYU Stern Data Library
📝 ソフトウェア: 5y revenue CAGR ~19.6%, NI CAGR ~29.8%。最高成長業界の一つ。
原文の引用を表示
"Damodaran NYU Stern Industry Historical Growth Data (Jan 2026): Software (System & Application), 309 firms, 5-year revenue CAGR 19.56%, 5-year net income CAGR 29.81%."
industry/tobacco_decline_profile industry/tobacco_decline_profile · 米国・tobacco(us_tobacco) 確信度: 高
米国・tobacco(us_tobacco)におけるindustry/tobacco_decline_profile: 2.91 (1 〜 4)
📊 値: 2.91 (1 〜 4) 📐 n=10 🗓 2021-2026 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2026) — NYU Stern Data Library
📝 タバコ: 数量縮小だが値上げで売上 +3% 維持。NI CAGR 29% は restructuring/buyback 効果。
原文の引用を表示
"Damodaran NYU Stern (Jan 2026): Tobacco, 10 firms, 5y revenue CAGR 2.91% (price-led), NI CAGR 29.23%."
industry/tobacco_decline_profile industry/tobacco_decline_profile · 米国・tobacco_volume(us_tobacco_volume) 確信度: 高
米国・tobacco_volume(us_tobacco_volume)におけるindustry/tobacco_decline_profile: -3.3 (-4 〜 -2.5)
📊 値: -3.3 (-4 〜 -2.5) 🗓 1980-2024 📚 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024) — CDC Office on Smoking and Health
📝 長期数量縮小 -3.3%/yr。直近は -5%/yr に加速。価格上昇がそれを概ね相殺し売上ほぼ横ばい。
原文の引用を表示
"CDC Office on Smoking and Health: "Since 1980, the average rate of decline in US per capita cigarette consumption was 3.3% per year... During 2015-2021, annual U.S. sales of cigarette packs declined about 27%, from 12.5 billion packs to 9.1 billion." Recent volume decline accelerated to ~5%/yr."
industry/utility_growth_profile industry/utility_growth_profile · 米国・utility_general(us_utility_general) 確信度: 高
米国・utility_general(us_utility_general)におけるindustry/utility_growth_profile: 5.33 (4 〜 6)
📊 値: 5.33 (4 〜 6) 📐 n=14 🗓 2021-2026 📚 Aswath Damodaran (2026) — NYU Stern Data Library
📝 電力ガス: 5y CAGR 5%。インフレ調整後 ~2-3%。最低成長セグメント。
原文の引用を表示
"Damodaran NYU Stern (Jan 2026): Utility (General), 14 firms, 5y revenue CAGR 5.33%, NI CAGR 4.86%."

事例集 case_studies

ターンアラウンド成功/失敗の代表例。
破壊的イノベーションによる王座交代 case_studies/disruptive_displacement · 破壊的業界 確信度: 高
破壊的業界における事例集(定性)
🗓 1970-1995 📚 Clayton Christensen (1997) — Harvard Business Review Press (book)
📝 ディスクドライブ業界: 5回以上の世代交代、各回25%のみ既存企業生残。
原文の引用を表示
"Disk drive industry: 5+ generational shifts, only 25% of incumbents survived each shift."
ターンアラウンド失敗例 case_studies/failed_turnaround_examples · 写真フィルム 確信度: 高
写真フィルムは構造的衰退で復活できなかった代表例(定性)
🗓 1990-2012 📚 Multiple HBR analyses (2012) — HBR/HBS
📝 コダック1975年デジタル発明→2012年倒産。22年構造衰退。
原文の引用を表示
"Kodak invented digital camera 1975 but failed to transition; bankruptcy 2012 after 22-year secular decline."
ターンアラウンド失敗例 case_studies/failed_turnaround_examples · 伝統小売 確信度: 高
伝統小売は構造的衰退で復活できなかった代表例(定性)
🗓 1990-2018 📚 Multiple academic case studies (2018) — HBS case
📝 シアーズ: 1980年代支配的→ディスカウント/EC適応失敗→2018年倒産。
原文の引用を表示
"Sears: dominant US retailer 1980s, never adapted to discount/online retail, bankruptcy 2018."
ターンアラウンド失敗例 case_studies/failed_turnaround_examples · 携帯端末 確信度: 高
携帯端末は構造的衰退で復活できなかった代表例(定性)
🗓 2007-2013 📚 Yves Doz & Mikko Kosonen (2014) — INSEAD case
📝 ノキア: 2007年シェア40%→2013年MS買収(ピーク価値の極一部)。
原文の引用を表示
"Nokia: 40% market share 2007, sold to Microsoft 2013 for fraction of peak value."
日本の失われた10年 case_studies/jp_lost_decade · 日本株(失われた10年) 確信度: 高
日本株(失われた10年)に学ぶ長期停滞の教訓(定性)
🗓 1990-2003 📚 Takeo Hoshi & Anil Kashyap (2004) — Journal of Economic Perspectives
📝 日経平均1989年高値復帰まで35年。EPS回復は業種別に大きく分岐。
原文の引用を表示
"Japans lost decade: TOPIX peaked 1989, did not return to peak until 2024 (35 years). EPS recovery was sector-divergent."
case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified · Eastman Kodak shareholder cumulative return from 1997-2000 peak to 2012 bankruptcy 確信度: 高
Eastman Kodak shareholder cumulative return from 1997-2000 peak to 2012 bankruptcyにおけるcase_studies/moat_erosion_quantified: -0.99
📊 値: -0.99 📐 n=1 🗓 1997-2012 📚 Joshua Kennon (2012) — Investor blog (joshuakennon.com)
📝 Iconic moat-loss case (digital photography disrupting film). Pre-bankruptcy ROE was high; CAP collapsed. Use as canonical -99% to -100% extreme case.
原文の引用を表示
"In 2000, Kodak had $4.59 per share earnings at a stock price of $39.38... By January 2012, Kodak shares had dropped over 90% in the past year, and the stock price had cratered to penny stock levels (from $3 to $0.20). On January 19, 2012 the company filed for Chapter 11. In 2013, Kodak reissued stock under symbol KODK after emerging from bankruptcy; old shares were rendered virtually worthless. Approximate cumulative loss: -99%."
case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified · Nokia shareholder cumulative return from 2007 peak (40% global handset share) to 2013 D&S sale to Microsoft 確信度: 高
Nokia shareholder cumulative return from 2007 peak (40% global handset share) to 2013 D&S sale to Microsoftにおけるcase_studies/moat_erosion_quantified: -0.875
📊 値: -0.875 📐 n=1 🗓 2007-2013 📚 The Motley Fool / MacroTrends (2013) — Financial press / data aggregator
📝 6-year horizon. Smartphone disruption (iPhone 2007, Android 2008) eroded mobile MOAT. Critical reference case for MOAT loss in tech hardware.
原文の引用を表示
"Nokia reached a peak stock price of around $40 per share in 2007 with valuation over $150 billion and 40% share in the handset market. By 2013, Nokia ADR shares traded at roughly $5 - approximately 87.5% loss from peak. (MacroTrends / The Motley Fool 2013.)"
case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified · BlackBerry / RIM shareholder cumulative return from June 2008 peak ($147.55) to 2023 確信度: 高
BlackBerry / RIM shareholder cumulative return from June 2008 peak ($147.55) to 2023におけるcase_studies/moat_erosion_quantified: -0.966
📊 値: -0.966 📐 n=1 🗓 2008-2023 📚 The Motley Fool (2023) — Investor commentary
📝 15-year horizon. Network effects on BBM eroded by iMessage/WhatsApp; enterprise mobile management lost to MDM vendors. Multi-decade slow MOAT erosion.
原文の引用を表示
"BlackBerrys stock closed at its all-time high of $147.55 on June 19, 2008. A $10,000 investment at BlackBerrys record high 15 years ago would have withered to about $340, which represents a decline of approximately 97%. (Motley Fool 2023.)"
case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified · Yahoo! shareholder return from January 2000 peak (~$125B mkt cap) through 2017 Verizon sale of core business 確信度: 高
Yahoo! shareholder return from January 2000 peak (~$125B mkt cap) through 2017 Verizon sale of core businessにおけるcase_studies/moat_erosion_quantified: -0.96 (-0.93 〜 -0.99)
📊 値: -0.96 (-0.93 〜 -0.99) 📐 n=1 🗓 2000-2017 📚 David L. Bahnsen / Axios reporting (2025) — Investor commentary
📝 Key case for search/portal MOAT loss to Google (search) and Facebook (display). Pure-core-business loss exceeds 96%; investors who held through Altaba split recovered some via Alibaba stake.
原文の引用を表示
"Yahoo was valued at over $125 billion at its peak in January 2000... reached an all-time low of $8.11 in 2001 (~93% decline from peak)... In June 2017, Verizon Communications acquired Yahoos core internet business for approximately $4.48 billion (~3.5% of peak value)."
case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified · AOL shareholder return: peak market cap (2000, ~$226B) to 2015 sale to Verizon ($4.4B) 確信度: 高
AOL shareholder return: peak market cap (2000, ~$226B) to 2015 sale to Verizon ($4.4B)におけるcase_studies/moat_erosion_quantified: -0.98
📊 値: -0.98 📐 n=1 🗓 2000-2015 📚 David L. Bahnsen / Axios reporting (2025) — Investor commentary
📝 Network access ISP MOAT eroded by broadband. Cumulative shareholder loss ~98% measuring corporate value, pre-merger AOL holders had varying outcomes via TWX shares.
原文の引用を表示
"AOLs market value plummeted from $226 billion to just $1 billion after the merger. On June 23, 2015, AOL was acquired by Verizon Communications for $4.4 billion. ... Considering AOLs market value plummeted... this represents a decline of over 99%."
case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified · Sears Holdings (SHLD) shareholder cumulative return from April 2007 peak ($131.21) to 2018 Chapter 11 確信度: 高
Sears Holdings (SHLD) shareholder cumulative return from April 2007 peak ($131.21) to 2018 Chapter 11におけるcase_studies/moat_erosion_quantified: -0.997
📊 値: -0.997 📐 n=1 🗓 2007-2018 📚 Cabot Wealth Network (2018) — Investor commentary
📝 11-year horizon. Retail MOAT eroded by Amazon and Wal-Mart. Capital allocation (buybacks instead of capex) accelerated decline.
原文の引用を表示
"Sears stock reached its April 2007 peak of $131.21 and ended at 41 cents before bankruptcy filing... Sears lost more than $24 billion in market value since 2007. The stock plunged more than 99% in value, from a high of $143.91 in 2007 to less than $1 a share. (Cabot Wealth Network 2018.)"
case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified case_studies/moat_erosion_quantified · Blockbuster (BBI) shareholder cumulative return from 2002 peak to September 2010 Chapter 11 確信度: 高
Blockbuster (BBI) shareholder cumulative return from 2002 peak to September 2010 Chapter 11におけるcase_studies/moat_erosion_quantified: -0.99
📊 値: -0.99 📐 n=1 🗓 2002-2010 📚 Richard Foster & Sarah Kaplan (2001) — McKinsey/Doubleday (book)
📝 Streaming/mail-DVD disruption case (Netflix). 8-year shareholder wipeout. Use to calibrate distress probability conditional on technology disruption.
原文の引用を表示
"On its peak in 2002 it was valued $5 billion, 9 years later it was sold for only a little over $300 million. Blockbuster filed for Chapter 11 on September 23, 2010. Now, the stock is available on the OTC market as a cheap penny stock."
ターンアラウンド成功例 case_studies/successful_turnaround_examples · 大型B2B 確信度: 高
大型B2Bは復活を遂げた代表例(定性)
🗓 1993-2002 📚 Louis Gerstner (2002) — HarperBusiness (book)
📝 IBM 1993年大幅赤字→2000年最高益。サービス転換で9年回復。
原文の引用を表示
"IBM lost ~$8B in 1993, recovered to record profits by 2000 through services pivot. 9-year recovery."
ターンアラウンド成功例 case_studies/successful_turnaround_examples · 消費者向けテック 確信度: 高
消費者向けテックは復活を遂げた代表例(定性)
🗓 1997-2007 📚 Multiple academic case studies (2007) — HBS case
📝 Apple 1997年倒産寸前→2011年世界最高値。製品革新による回復。
原文の引用を表示
"Apple near-bankruptcy 1997, became most valuable company by 2011 through product innovation (iMac, iPod, iPhone)."

📚 Sources — 学術ソース(835 件)

ID名称著者媒体URL/DOI概要
257 Damodaran Industry Historical Growth Data 2026 Aswath Damodaran 2026 NYU Stern Data Library https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/histgr.html
5,994 US firms across industries; 5-year CAGR of revenues and net income by industry as of January 2026.
352 Damodaran Margin/ROIC by Sector (US) Aswath Damodaran 2026 NYU Stern data files https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/mgnroc.html
Annually updated industry-level operating margin and ROIC dataset for US-listed firms; baseline reference for cross-industry margin and ROIC dispersion.
355 JP Morgan Guide to the Markets (US) J.P. Morgan Asset Management (M.Cembalest, S.Hill, et al.) 2026 J.P. Morgan Asset Management https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/adv/insights/market-insights/guide-to-the-markets/
Quarterly chartbook with reference data on sector P/E vs 20y average, range of returns by holding period, behavior gap, and asset-class returns.
715 Future Box AI substitution working prior kabufu / Codex 2026 Internal modeling prior Working prior for AI-agent substitution risk: software, business services, media/advertising and human-labor knowledge services may face demand erosion, price compression, and lower multiple tolerance.
723 Kabufu MC model audit 2026-05-09 Codex / Kabufu internal audit 2026 Internal analysis file:/home/adore321/kabufu.com/precompute/mc_eps_first.php
Audit of v1.0.11 Monte Carlo outputs, event calibration, and research.db integration. Based on 974 current mc_results rows and future_box calibration outputs.
724 Kabufu future_box R calibration v0.8 Kabufu internal R calibration 2026 Internal calibration output file:/home/adore321/kabufu.com/research_outputs/future_box/event_calibration_summary.csv
Historical 5-year-window calibration for event taxonomy using Kabufu Japan finance and monthly price data. Useful but must be de-overlapped and converted carefully before annual MC use.
725 Kabufu model philosophy memo 2026-05-09 Kabufu / user guidance / Codex 2026 Internal model governance memo file:/home/adore321/kabufu.com/inference/research.db
Principles for improving the Monte Carlo future box: do not fit to current price; diagnose model blind spots; calibrate probabilities to realistic base rates and conditional scenarios.
735 Ritter IPO Long-run Returns 2026 Jay R. Ritter 2026 IPO long-run statistics https://site.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/files/IPOs-long-run-returns-on-IPOs.pdf
Long-run IPO return data, including unprofitable, low-sales, and life-science IPO base rates.
749 Kenneth French Japan 5 Factors Kenneth R. French Data Library 2026 Data library https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html
Japan factor returns. 1990-2026 recalculation suggests HML remains material while RMW/CMA are weaker.
750 Kenneth French Japan 25 Portfolios ME BE-ME Kenneth R. French Data Library 2026 Data library https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html
Japan size by BE/ME portfolios show high book-to-market portfolios outperform low book-to-market portfolios over the sample.
751 Kenneth French Japan 25 Portfolios ME OP Kenneth R. French Data Library 2026 Data library https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html
Japan operating-profitability portfolio evidence; profitability premium is weaker and less monotonic than in US evidence.
756 JPX List of Delisted Companies Japan Exchange Group 2026 JPX https://www.jpx.co.jp/english/listing/stocks/delisted/index.html
JPX delistings mix MBO/TOB, merger, subsidiary conversion, criteria failures, fraud and distress.
761 Kabufu MC v1.0.14 exit mixture implementation Kabufu internal model audit 2026 internal Implemented exit-mixture state transitions so debt overhang and distress events do not always become immediate zero-price wipeout.
762 Kabufu MC v1.0.15 profitability regime implementation Kabufu internal model audit 2026 internal Implemented profitability-regime probabilities so margin expansion/compression events represent structural changes beyond normal annual mean reversion.
765 Kabufu MC v1.0.16 overlay pass-through implementation Kabufu internal model audit 2026 internal file:/home/adore321/kabufu.com/precompute/mc_eps_first.php
Implemented reliability shrinkage for future outlook overlays so task/theme exposure probabilities remain visible but direct EPS, margin, multiple, and event multiplier pass-through is partial.
766 Kabufu MC v1.0.17 distress wipeout mixture implementation Kabufu internal model audit 2026 internal file:/home/adore321/kabufu.com/precompute/mc_eps_first.php
Implemented conditional distress wipeout probability so a distress event can become wipeout, dilution/restructuring, or low-value survival depending on balance sheet stress, market cap, PBR, and risk scores.
767 Kabufu MC v1.0.18 competing valuation regime implementation Kabufu internal model audit 2026 internal file:/home/adore321/kabufu.com/precompute/mc_eps_first.php
Implemented competing valuation-regime events so multiple_compression and multiple_expansion cannot both occur in the same simulation path.
768 Kabufu MC v1.0.19 cyclical terminal normalization implementation Kabufu internal model audit 2026 internal file:/home/adore321/kabufu.com/precompute/mc_eps_first.php
Implemented mid-cycle terminal normalization for high-cyclicality companies: year-10 market-price paths still reflect boom/bust, but fundamental PV terminal input partially blends terminal margin/ROE back toward normalized mid-cycle economics.
769 Kabufu MC v1.0.20 macro cycle regime implementation Kabufu internal model audit 2026 internal file:/home/adore321/kabufu.com/precompute/mc_eps_first.php
Implemented persistent macro/cycle states for recession, normal, and boom. Annual recession/boom probabilities now govern state transitions instead of independent annual shocks.
770 Kabufu MC v1.0.21 biotech option tail implementation Kabufu internal Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 internal Implemented a biotech-only stage-gated option-value floor in mc_eps_first.php. The change is based on existing research.db evidence that biotech outcomes have high failure/base-loss rates but a material acquisition/approval/partnership right tail, so it should affect distribution shape rather than force convergence to market prices.
774 Kabufu MC v1.0.24 software sales tail targeted test Kabufu internal Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 internal Targeted no-save experiment for software_sys/software_internet outliers. Tested a gated sales-multiple terminal tail based on intangible-capital and SaaS Rule-of-40 research. Not deployed because 100-iteration divergent-ticker tests did not show stable improvement beyond simulation noise.
775 Kabufu MC v1.0.25 mature rerating overlap targeted test Kabufu internal Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 internal Targeted no-save experiment for positive divergence in mature low-PBR names. Tested reducing standalone multiple-expansion hazard when low-PBR rerating may already be represented by capital-return acceleration. Not deployed because seeded 100-iteration tests were mixed and path interaction sometimes increased fair value.
776 Kabufu MC v1.0.26 rerating competition targeted test Kabufu internal Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 internal Targeted no-save experiment for upper divergence in mature value names. Tested making low-PBR mature-stock multiple expansion compete with already-realized capital-return acceleration inside each path. Not deployed because seeded 100-iteration tests were mixed and sometimes raised terminal values.
777 Kabufu MC v1.0.27 rerating co-occurrence diagnostic Kabufu internal Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 internal No-save diagnostic run for upper-divergence mature/value names. Added temporary counters for capital-return acceleration and multiple expansion/compression co-occurrence within the same 100-path run. No production model change.
778 Kabufu MC v1.0.29 mature S/C rerating branch targeted test Kabufu internal Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 internal Targeted no-save experiment for upper divergence in mature low-PBR S/C-state names. Replaced independent capital-return, multiple-expansion, and multiple-compression draws with a path-level competing rerating branch for mature value candidates only. Not deployed yet; candidate for next narrow promotion and later full recompute.
779 Kabufu MC v1.0.29 broader mature S/C rerating branch validation Kabufu internal Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 internal Broader no-save validation of the mature S/C low-PBR competing rerating branch on 14 upper-divergence candidates. No production model change and no full recompute.
780 Kabufu MC v1.0.30 stable mature rerating branch targeted test Kabufu internal Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 internal Targeted no-save experiment for upper divergence in stable mature low-PBR sectors. The competing rerating branch is limited to wholesale, railroad, trucking, beverage, and household_products-like mature stable sectors plus the configured whitelist. No production model change and no full recompute.
781 Kabufu MC v1.0.30 stable mature rerating additional validation Kabufu internal Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 internal Additional no-save validation of the stable mature rerating branch on 12 previously untested candidates. No production model change and no full recompute.
782 Kabufu MC v1.0.31-v1.0.32 positive rerating overlap targeted test Kabufu internal diagnostics 2026 internal targeted no-save Monte Carlo diagnostic Twelve stable mature low-PBR tickers were tested with 100 no-save iterations. v1.0.31 showed that v1.0.30 mixed results are not explained simply by higher multiple-expansion frequency. v1.0.32 allowed compression to coexist with capital return while competing positive overlap only; under the same seed it still raised many tickers, suggesting capital return feeds valuation through multiple paths and needs more granular calibration rather than a broad branch rule.
786 Kabufu MC v1.0.33-v1.0.34 capital return ablation targeted test Kabufu internal diagnostics 2026 internal targeted no-save Monte Carlo diagnostic Ablated capital-return effects on twelve stable mature low-PBR tickers. Removing payout-base bump lowered fv_p50 by an average 845 yen, while removing share drift lowered 52 yen and removing multiple shock lowered 26 yen. A budgeted payout/buyback candidate lowered 11 of 14 upper-divergence names but slightly lowered lower-divergence names too; not deployed pending narrower validation.
787 Kabufu MC v1.0.36 gated capital-return budget targeted validation Kabufu internal diagnostics 2026 internal targeted no-save Monte Carlo validation A gated capital-return budget rule was tested with fair randomization on upper-divergence, lower-divergence, stable mature, and near-fair control buckets using 100 no-save iterations. The rule applies only to positive-EPS S/C state low-growth low-PBR companies excluding biotech/software/semiconductor option-like industries. It lowered 14/14 upper-divergence names, left 12/12 lower-divergence names unchanged, lowered 12/12 stable mature names, and lowered 16/16 near-fair controls. This supports the hypothesis that the existing model over-capitalizes permanent payout-base increases in mature low-PBR firms, but broad fair-control impact means no deployment yet.
788 Kabufu MC v1.0.37 full recompute rollback diagnostic Kabufu internal diagnostics 2026 internal production recompute and rollback note v1.0.37 capital-return budget mixture was deployed after targeted validation and full recomputed. Full diagnostics showed only small reduction in upper extreme count and a worse lower-extreme/average-gap profile, so the production script and results were rolled back to v1.0.23 via backup and full recompute.
790 Kabufu MC v1.0.38-v1.0.39 software scale-up targeted test Kabufu internal diagnostics 2026 internal targeted no-save Monte Carlo diagnostic Tested a software scale-up rule for companies with high recent revenue growth and improving low operating margins. v1.0.38 raised lower-divergence software names but also over-raised already-profitable growth names. v1.0.39 excluded operating margins above 12%, limiting changes to transition-stage companies; on 30 divergent software names, 6 changed and 24 were unchanged at 100 iterations.
791 Kabufu MC v1.0.39 software scale-up full recompute diagnostic Kabufu internal diagnostics 2026 internal production recompute diagnostic v1.0.39 software scale-up persistence was deployed and full recomputed. It affects only six software_sys/software_internet companies meeting high-revenue-growth, improving low-operating-margin, Rule-of-40-like criteria. Full recompute showed no worsening in upper50/lower50 counts and reduced abs80 from the immediate v1.0.23 rollback baseline, with 4384 and 4784 leaving extreme lower divergence.
792 Kabufu internal restaurant margin panel 2021-2025 Kabufu financial database 2026 Kabufu finance-custom.db / EDINET-derived annuals internal://finance-custom.db/kabufu_annual
Restaurant industry panel computed from Kabufu annual financials joined to analysis_meta industry_code=restaurant; used to calibrate realistic thin-margin future boxes without fitting to market prices.
794 Kabufu internal wholesale margin panel 2021-2025 Kabufu financial database 2026 Kabufu finance-custom.db / EDINET-derived annuals internal://finance-custom.db/kabufu_annual
Wholesale industry panel computed from Kabufu annual financials joined to analysis_meta industry_code=wholesale; used to calibrate distressed sales-multiple behavior for thin-margin distribution businesses.
795 Kabufu MC wholesale margin ceiling diagnostics 2026-05-10 Kabufu/Codex internal diagnostic 2026 Kabufu mc_eps_first.php targeted no-save diagnostics Targeted no-save Monte Carlo diagnostics comparing current v1.0.39 against thin-margin wholesale net-margin ceiling candidates for Japanese specialist wholesalers.
797 Kabufu v1.0.40 lower-tail low-margin pass-through diagnostics 2026-05-11 Kabufu internal MC diagnostics 2026 internal diagnostic: mc_results v1.0.40 + kabufu_annual finance history + targeted no-save runs Screened v1.0.40 saved MC paths and annual finance history for stable-positive companies whose median EPS path turns negative; ran targeted 100-300 no-save diagnostics on low-margin pass-through candidates and event ablations.
798 Kabufu v1.0.41 stable low-margin floor deployment 2026-05-11 Kabufu internal MC diagnostics 2026 internal diagnostic: annual margin history + targeted no-save MC tests Low-margin pass-through companies showed a model floor defect: current marginFloor allowed a blanket -12% net margin even when decades of annual history had no net losses or only shallow losses. Deployed a narrow empirical floor for stable low-margin pass-through industries.
799 Kabufu v1.0.41 low-margin bucket targeted validation 2026-05-11 Kabufu internal MC diagnostics 2026 internal targeted no-save simulation: 33 stable low-margin pass-through tickers, 100 iterations paired seed Compared v1.0.40 backup with deployed v1.0.41 on stable low-margin pass-through bucket only, no-save, 100 iterations with paired seed. Used for behavior validation, not full recompute.
800 Kabufu thin pass-through turnaround calibration and v1.0.42 diagnostic 2026-05-11 Kabufu internal MC diagnostics 2026 internal finance-custom.db 5-year transition panel plus targeted no-save MC tests Calibrated thin pass-through loss/barely-profitable transitions using Kabufu annual finance history for wholesale, retail, grocery, specialty retail, and oil/gas distribution. Tested a v1.0.42 candidate that caps strong turnaround_recovery incidence for low-margin pass-through D/L cases.
801 Kabufu thin pass-through distressed residual P/S diagnostic 2026-05-11 Kabufu internal MC diagnostics 2026 internal cross-sectional P/S screen plus targeted no-save MC tests Reviewed upper-divergence thin pass-through cases where terminal EPS median could be negative while terminal price/FV remained high due generic residual sales multiples. Calibrated from current P/S distribution for wholesale/retail/grocery/specialty/oil distribution and targeted no-save tests.
802 Kabufu v1.0.43 upper-divergence positive-depressed turnaround diagnostic 2026-05-11 Kabufu internal MC diagnostics 2026 internal 5-year transition panel, targeted no-save ablations, and spot external price check for 5706 https://www.investing.com/equities/mitsui-mining-and-smelting-co.-historical-data
Reviewed upper-divergence names after v1.0.43, focusing on positive but depressed D/C states such as 7267 and 2269. Checked internal 5-year recovery base rates and ran no-save turnaround ablations. Also spot-checked 5706 external price to rule out a simple 10x local price bug.
803 Kabufu internal stable electronics terminal-margin base-rate study Kabufu diagnostics 2026 research.db internal historical cohort study Internal cohort of Japanese electronics_consumer/electrical_equipment/electronic_components listings: 10-year positive EPS and positive net-margin windows with equity ratio >=30% showed rare 10-year terminal net losses, supporting a stable-electronics resilience guard.
804 Kabufu internal restaurant and hospitality recent-loss recovery study Kabufu diagnostics 2026 research.db internal historical cohort study Internal cohort of Japanese restaurant and hospitality listings where latest EPS was positive but the prior 5-year window included losses. Used to diagnose whether low-margin recovery-stage companies should be state S, D, or L in the Monte Carlo model.
805 Kabufu software AI overlay ablation diagnostics Kabufu diagnostics 2026 targeted no-save Monte Carlo ablation Targeted 500-iteration no-save ablations on software_sys/software_internet divergent tickers tested whether AI substitution overlays or multiple compression were sole drivers of low valuation outputs.
806 Kabufu internal diagnostic: utility capital return constraint v1.0.45 targeted test (2026-05-12) Kabufu Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 Internal targeted no-save simulation and ablation log Upper-divergence ablation showed several high-FV cases were sensitive to capital_return_acceleration. The defect candidate was concentrated in regulated capital-intensive utilities where low equity ratios and debt-overhang risk make sustained payout and buyback acceleration less plausible than for ordinary mature cash generators.
807 Kabufu internal diagnostic: v1.0.45 lower-divergence ablation for AI/capex enablers (2026-05-12) Kabufu Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 Internal targeted no-save simulation and ablation log Targeted lower-divergence diagnostics for old -90% cases and AI/capex/power-grid enablers under production v1.0.45. Current model still marks many high-PBR/high-multiple names as materially overvalued, but the ablation indicates this is mostly not caused by a single excessive multiple-compression or secular-decline event.
809 Kabufu internal diagnostic: v1.0.46 investment holding NAV candidate not sufficient (2026-05-12) Kabufu Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 Internal targeted no-save simulation A simple investment-holding heuristic that removed securities AI-substitution overlay and raised PBR blending barely changed 9984. The remaining failure is absence of NAV/share input, not a tunable EPS/PBR blend parameter.
811 Kabufu internal diagnostic: v1.0.46 NAV input floor deployed (2026-05-12) Kabufu Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 Internal targeted no-save simulation and deployment log Production v1.0.46 adds an explicit investment_holding_nav_inputs table and a stressed current-NAV floor for investment-holding-like companies with sourced NAV/share data. Targeted tests were limited to 9984 and finance controls; no all-ticker recompute was run.
812 Kabufu internal diagnostic: v1.0.47 mature auto turnaround cap deployed (2026-05-12) Kabufu Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 Internal targeted no-save simulation and deployment log Upper-divergence scan showed mature auto OEMs in D/L states could receive near-certain 10y turnaround events. Production v1.0.47 caps auto_oem/auto_parts D/L turnaround annual probability using existing high-confidence cyclical_asset scenario priors instead of allowing event-taxonomy exposure to hit the generic 30% annual ceiling.
814 Kabufu internal diagnostic: v1.0.48 biotech pipeline stage input deployed (2026-05-12) Kabufu Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 Internal targeted no-save simulation and deployment log Production v1.0.48 adds biotech_pipeline_inputs and shifts biotech option-value retention distribution only for sourced approved/launch-preparation pipeline assets. Targeted tests showed 4592 changed while control 4588 was stable; no all-ticker recompute was run.
815 Kabufu internal diagnostic: v1.0.49 loss-maker turnaround prior cap deployed (2026-05-12) Kabufu Monte Carlo diagnostics 2026 Internal targeted no-save simulation and deployment log Production v1.0.49 caps L/D-state turnaround_recovery annual probability for loss-maker, serial-diluter, and balance-sheet-stress cases using existing scenario_outcome_rates priors. The goal is to prevent generic event exposure from implying near-certain 10y turnaround when empirical 5y scenario priors are much lower.
816 JapanIR Fujikura stock split 2026 summary JapanIR / TDnet summary 2026 JapanIR https://japanir.jp/en/company/company-5803/ir/5803-20260225-03_wp_capital_policy/
Fujikura 5803 resolved a 1-for-6 stock split with record date 2026-03-31 and effective date 2026-04-01; issued shares increase from 295,863,421 to 1,775,180,526.
817 Kabufu internal 5032 industry classification audit Kabufu MC diagnostics 2026 internal diagnostic 5032 analysis_meta describes VTuber/IP business; targeted v1.0.52 no-save probe compared software_internet vs software_entertainment classification.
818 GNI F351 China NDA priority-review prior consultation 2026-01-06 GNI Group / TDnet via JapanIR 2026 company IR disclosure https://japanir.jp/en/company/company-2160/ir/2160-20260106-01_wp_product_announcement/
GNI/Gyre disclosed completion of CDE prior consultation for F351 China NDA submission; Phase 3 was favorable, conditional approval submission is possible, and priority review eligibility was confirmed.
819 Metaplanet Bitcoin holdings disclosure 2026-04-02 Metaplanet Inc. 2026 company IR disclosure https://metaplanet.jp/disclosure/en/20260402T160721Z-_4_2_2026__-_Notice_of_Additional_Purchase_of_Bitcoin___2_.pdf
Metaplanet disclosed 40,177 BTC total holdings as of 2026-03-31, common shares 1,274,171,340 and effective diluted shares 1,624,499,175 for BTC Yield calculations.
820 Oncolys OBP-301 pipeline and FDA Fast Track disclosure Oncolys BioPharma; Medigen Biotechnology 2026 Company pipeline and material information disclosures https://www.medigen.com.tw/en/upload/material_information_120260423165111.pdf
Oncolys pipeline pages list Telomelysin/OBP-301 clinical programs including Phase 2 studies; Medigen material information dated 2026-04-23 states FDA Fast Track designation for OBP-301 plus radiation therapy in unresectable gastroesophageal cancer and notes rolling-review eligibility but continued development risk.
821 Kabufu internal diagnostic: rejected stable service margin resilience candidate v1.0.57 Kabufu MC diagnostics 2026 internal targeted no-save test Targeted tests on restaurant/hospitality lower-divergence names after v1.0.56. Candidate added a narrow stability margin floor and volatility shrink for long-history positive-guidance restaurants/hotels, but 100/500 no-save comparisons did not improve model behavior robustly.
822 Kabufu internal diagnostic: rejected low-margin service volatility anchor candidate v1.0.57 Kabufu MC diagnostics 2026 internal targeted no-save test Targeted 100-iteration no-save test for restaurant/hospitality names after v1.0.56. Candidate anchored low-margin service annual margin noise to observed recent margin volatility, but did not improve 7616/9708 behavior and risked becoming a cosmetic adjustment.
823 Kabufu internal diagnostic: rejected cyclical low-PBR distress blend candidate v1.0.57 Kabufu MC diagnostics 2026 internal targeted no-save test Targeted 500-iteration no-save test for upper-divergence low-PBR/cyclical names after v1.0.56. Candidate capped PBR blend for D-state high-cyclicality low-PBR names from 0.72 to 0.58, but did not reduce 7267 upper divergence.
824 Kabufu internal diagnostic: v1.0.57 negative guidance anchor Kabufu MC diagnostics 2026 internal targeted no-save test Targeted diagnostics found that explicit negative EPS and negative net-margin company guidance was underweighted after a positive trailing EPS year, allowing immediate reversion to normal profits. 7267 was the representative case; controls included existing loss makers and non-negative-guidance cyclicals.
825 Kabufu internal diagnostic: rejected finance-conglomerate equity-ratio exemption candidate v1.0.58 Kabufu MC diagnostics 2026 internal targeted no-save test https://global.rakuten.com/corp/news/press/2026/0212_01.html
Targeted test for Rakuten-like finance-heavy conglomerates after v1.0.57. Public Rakuten FY2025 materials show Internet Services, FinTech and Mobile segments, bond market access, and mobile EBITDA progress, supporting the hypothesis that simple industrial equity-ratio stress may be too crude. However, the candidate did not improve targeted model behavior robustly.
826 Nxera Pharma Q1 2026 operational highlights and consolidated results Nxera Pharma 2026 Company operational highlights and consolidated results https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/05/01/3285682/0/en/nxera-pharma-operational-highlights-and-consolidated-results-for-the-first-quarter-2026.html
Official Q1 2026 update for 4565 describing commercial licensing activity, regulatory progress, and partnered muscarinic programs including direclidine/NBI-1117568 Phase 3 studies in schizophrenia.
829 Atom shareholder benefit program Atom Corporation 2026 Company IR shareholder benefit page https://www.atom-corp.co.jp/ir/shareholder.html
Official Atom IR page states current shareholder benefit points: annual total 2,000 points for 100-499 shares, 10,000 for 500-999, and 20,000 for 1,000 or more; one point can be used as one yen.
831 Infomart FY2025 results and FY2026 forecast Infomart Corporation 2026 Company results presentation / financial forecast https://ircms.irstreet.com/contents/data_file.php?brand=12&data=270032&filename=pdf_file.pdf&template=1878
Company materials and forecast indicate continued double-digit revenue growth and a sharp operating-profit recovery for 2492, consistent with operating leverage in a profitable cloud/platform business.
835 Colowide shareholder benefits official page COLOWIDE CO., LTD. 2026 Company investor relations website https://www.colowide.co.jp/en_us/ir/stock_info/stockholder/
Official shareholder benefit page: shareholders holding 500 or more shares receive shareholder benefit points worth 10,000 yen four times per year when holding across both March and September record dates; points can be used as 1 point = 1 yen at eligible group stores or exchanged for items.
836 Allegro MicroSystems ownership and Sanken repurchase disclosures Allegro MicroSystems; MarketScreener; Public.com; Exchange-rate references 2026 Company IR press release, ownership table, market price references https://investors.allegromicro.com/news-releases/news-release-details/allegro-microsystems-inc-enters-its-next-phase-public-company/ ; https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/ALLEGRO-MICROSYSTEMS-INC-166577863/company-shareholders/ ; https://public.com/stocks/algm/pre-market ; https://wise.com/gb/currency-converter/usd-to-jpy-rate/history
Allegro disclosed Sanken ownership would fall to about 32.5% after repurchase; MarketScreener listed Sanken at 59,732,782 ALGM shares / 32.24%; May-2026 market references show ALGM around USD47.60 and USDJPY around 156.68. Used only as a stressed listed-holding NAV input, not a target price.
837 Imperial Hotel shareholder benefit official page Imperial Hotel, Ltd. 2026 Company investor relations website https://www.imperialhotel.co.jp/financial/incentives
Official shareholder benefit page: shareholders holding 100 or more shares receive annual hotel-use coupons; 100-299 shares receive 1,000 yen, with larger tiers and long-term-holder additions.
49 AOL-Time Warner Case (Bahnsen Group / Axios summaries) David L. Bahnsen / Axios reporting 2025 Investor commentary https://thebahnsengroup.com/dividend-cafe/what-to-learn-from-the-worst-business-deal-in-history-july-18-2025/
Aggregates publicly known facts: AOL peak market cap ~$226B (2000), merger valuation $182B; Verizon acquired AOL for $4.4B in 2015 (~99% destruction from peak); equivalent shareholder loss for Yahoo (Verizon paid $4.48B in 2017 vs $125B peak in 2000).
56 RECOF/MARR Japan M&A Statistics 2024 Recof Data / MARR Online 2025 MARR Online https://www.marr.jp/menu/ma_statistics/ma_markettrend/entry/56991
日本企業M&A 2024年回顧。総件数4,700件(過去最多)、TOB100件超(2007年以来17年ぶり)、IN-IN 3,702件、事業承継M&A 920件。
57 MARR Online: M&A delisting trends 2024 Recof Data 2025 MARR Online https://www.marr.jp/menu/ma_statistics/ma_markettrend/entry/57631
2024年M&A・グループ内再編による上場廃止94件 (2023:71件、+32.4%)、新規上場件数86件を上回り上場企業数が初めて減少。
59 Square Corporate Advisory: 2024 M&A Premium Analysis Square Corporate Advisory 2025 Square Corporate Advisory column https://www.squaregroup.co.jp/column/2024年度ma買収プレミアムの動向と分析/
2024年度TOB案件 premium中央値 43.3%、レンジ 7.0%-275.1%。
61 M&A Online: TOB pace 50+ in May 2025 M&A Online 2025 M&A Online https://maonline.jp/articles/tob_over_fiftycases_20250513
2024年TOB 100件超(2007年104件以来17年ぶり)、2022年59件。2025年5月時点で既に50件、過去最速ペース。
62 CorpDev.Org: Japan New M&A Framework 2025 CorpDev.Org editorial 2025 CorpDev.Org https://www.corpdev.org/2025/04/24/japans-new-ma-framework-elevates-take-private-costs-as-regulatory-scrutiny-intensifies/
Japanese take-private premium 2024=42%, 2022=34%。Take-private = 61% of PE deals in 2024 vs 45% in 2021. 37% of TOPIX below 1x P/B (Q1 2025).
64 JPX Listed Company Statistics 2024 Japan Exchange Group 2025 JPX listing statistics https://www.jpx.co.jp/listing/co/index.html
2024年末上場企業: プライム1,640社、スタンダード1,592社、グロース610社、TOKYO PRO Market 133社、合計3,975社(外国会社6社)。
67 Insource: Parent-Subsidiary listing dissolution TOB 2024 Insource HR Article 2025 Insource HR Article https://www.insource.co.jp/contents/hr-article-no79392.html
親子上場解消目的TOB件数。2024年=11件、2025年5月時点で8件 (過去10年最速ペース)。
68 Law.asia: Japan unsolicited offers post-METI 2023 guidelines Law.asia 2025 Law.asia https://law.asia/japan-unsolicited-offers-meti-guidelines-impact/
METI 2023年買収ガイドライン以降、敵対的・同意なきTOB 6件 (2025/2末時点)。成功事例で premium 79.68%, 86.84%。
72 Lexology: Year in review M&A Japan 2024 Lexology / Mori Hamada 2025 Lexology https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7e47fbe9-ddcd-446b-a8b7-aa33ab5e5410
2024年TOB 99件 (+23.8% YoY)、$28.1B (-17.1% YoY)。
74 Mauboussin 2025 "Drawdowns and Recoveries" Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan 2025 Counterpoint Global Insights / Morgan Stanley (white paper, May 2025) https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_drawdownsandrecoveries_ltr.pdf
6,500+ US stocks 1985-2024. Median max drawdown 85%. 54% never recover to par. Recovery probability inversely proportional to drawdown size: 80% (0-50%) vs ~17% (95-100%).
78 Carlson 2025 "Not All Stocks Recover Their Losses" Ben Carlson 2025 A Wealth of Common Sense (May 2025 commentary on Mauboussin 2025) https://awealthofcommonsense.com/2025/05/not-all-stocks-recover-their-losses/
Plain-language summary of Mauboussin 2025 with example stocks: Citigroup -87%, Walgreens -88%, Estee Lauder -82% remain underwater for years.
81 ICLG Restructuring & Insolvency Japan 2025-2026 ICLG / Nishimura & Asahi / Anderson Mori & Tomotsune 2025 International Comparative Legal Guides https://iclg.com/practice-areas/restructuring-and-insolvency-laws-and-regulations/japan
Civil Rehabilitation vs Corporate Reorganization in Japan: equity nearly always wiped (reorganization), 100% loss for shareholders is the norm. Senior unsecured recovery often 5-30%.
258 Bessembinder 2025 "One Hundred Years in U.S. Stock Markets" Hendrik Bessembinder 2025 SSRN Working Paper https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6438198
29,754 US common stocks 1926-2025. Documents skew of returns; small decile only 42.4% positive 10-year returns vs 81.3% for large decile.
259 SaaS Capital Benchmarks 2024-2025 SaaS Capital 2025 SaaS Capital Bootstrapped Benchmarks https://www.saas-capital.com/blog-posts/benchmarking-metrics-for-bootstrapped-saas-companies/
Survey of B2B private SaaS companies. Median growth declines monotonically with scale; <$1M ARR firms grow ~50% YoY, >$20M ARR ~25%.
261 Damodaran "Data Update 5 for 2025: Profitability" Aswath Damodaran 2025 Musings on Markets / Substack https://aswathdamodaran.substack.com/p/data-update-5-for-2025-profitability
Global firm dataset, 2024 fiscal year. Documents 80% of firms earn ROIC < cost of capital; Japan has 82% money-makers but only 40% exceed cost of equity.
349 Russell Investments Concentrated Stock Risk Russell Investments Research 2025 Russell Investments Insights https://russellinvestments.com/content/ri/us/en/insights/russell-research/2025/02/concentrated-stock-positions-high-rewards-higher-risks--what-to-.html
Median individual-stock volatility in the Russell 3000 (1999-2018) was more than 3x the index volatility, illustrating the diversification cost of single-stock concentration.
407 Damodaran Industry Working Capital Data Damodaran, Aswath 2025 NYU Stern Datasets https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/dataarchived.html
Industry-level data on Non-cash Working Capital as % Revenue, Days Sales Outstanding, Days Inventory, Days Payable, by US industry and global industry. Updated annually.
702 Mauboussin "Drawdowns and Recoveries" 2025 Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan 2025 Counterpoint Global / Morgan Stanley 20%+下落のあった年の翌年S&P500平均+15%、底値起算1年では+38%。1928-2024の97年で27回の弱気相場の86%が3年内にピーク回復。
716 World Economic Forum Future of Jobs Report 2025 World Economic Forum 2025 Future of Jobs Report 2025 https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/
Employer survey across economies and industries; AI and information processing technology are major drivers of job transformation through 2030, with clerical, secretarial, design and some legal support roles facing decline pressure.
726 McKinsey How to value cyclical companies McKinsey & Company 2025 McKinsey Corporate Finance https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/how-to-value-cyclical-companies
Cyclical company valuation should focus on long-term trend rather than current cycle point; consensus often extrapolates peaks and troughs; market pricing may blend cycle reversion and new-trend scenarios.
758 TSR Japan Corporate Bankruptcies 2024 Tokyo Shoko Research 2025 TSR https://www.tsr-net.co.jp/news/status/detail/1200857_1610.html
2024 overall bankruptcies rose, but listed-company bankruptcy was one case.
796 Panasonic Holdings official business segments and FY2025 materials Panasonic Holdings Corporation 2025 Panasonic official investor/news materials https://news.panasonic.com/global/press/en250509-4
Official Panasonic FY2025 financial materials and business/segment disclosures show Panasonic is a diversified group including automotive batteries, Blue Yonder/supply-chain software, infrastructure, industry, energy, and consumer/lifestyle businesses rather than a pure consumer electronics/AV exposure.
808 SoftBank Group Report 2025: NAV and LTV as primary valuation metrics for SBG SoftBank Group Corp. 2025 SoftBank Group Report 2025, Growth Assets section https://group.softbank/media/Project/sbg/sbg/pdf/ir/financials/annual_reports/annual-report_fy2025_05_en.pdf
Official SBG report states that NAV is the key metric for assessing SBG, gives March 31 2025 NAV of JPY25.7tn, equity value of holdings of JPY31.4tn, net debt of JPY5.7tn, and LTV of 18.0%. This supports treating SBG-like investment holding companies with a NAV/asset-value sleeve rather than pure EPS-first terminal valuation.
810 SoftBank Group NAV per Share page as of December 31 2025 SoftBank Group Corp. 2025 SoftBank Group Investor Relations https://group.softbank/en/ir/stock/sotp
Official SBG SOTP/NAV page gives December 31 2025 NAV per share JPY5,427, NAV JPY30.93tn, equity value of holdings JPY38.98tn, net debt JPY8.05tn, and LTV 20.6%, reflecting the four-for-one stock split effective January 1 2026.
813 SanBio AKUUGO partial change approval and launch preparation 2025-12-09 SanBio Co., Ltd. 2025 Official SanBio news release https://www.sanbio.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/PR%EF%BC%BFEN.pdf
SanBio announced that MHLW approved a partial change to AKUUGO marketing authorization, lifting the previous shipment restriction condition. AKUUGO remains under conditional and time-limited approval, with launch planned after NHI price listing and full approval targeted within seven years.
832 IEA Energy and AI 2025 International Energy Agency 2025 IEA special report https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai
IEA projects data centre electricity demand more than doubling to 2030, with AI-optimised data centres a major driver; useful as a forward infrastructure-demand prior, not a direct equity valuation target.
833 LightCounting Cloud Data Center Optics July 2025 LightCounting 2025 Cloud Data Center Optics market report/newsletter https://www.lightcounting.com/newsletter/en/july-2025-cloud-data-center-optics-330
LightCounting describes AI clusters as a new market for optical interconnects and forecasts strong optical connectivity growth through 2030; useful for optical/fiber direct-demand persistence priors.
1 Damodaran 2024 Country/Industry Data Aswath Damodaran 2024 NYU Stern (online dataset, updated annually) https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
業種別ベータ・ERP・成長率・WACCの公開データセット。日本ERPは5.14% (Jan 2026)、業種別g_terminalも掲載。
25 Moodys "Annual Default Study" 2024 Moodys Investors Service 2024 Annual Default Report https://www.moodys.com/research/default-and-recovery-rates
格付け別年次倒産率の最も体系的なデータ。1920年代-現在をカバー。
26 S&P Global "Annual Global Corporate Default Study" S&P Global Ratings 2024 Annual Default Report https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/research-insights/default-transition-and-recovery
S&Pによる年次デフォルト・回収率レポート。投資適格と投機級ごと。
63 Daiwa Institute: M&A activity in Japan 2023 Daiwa Institute of Research 2024 Daiwa Institute consulting report https://www.dir.co.jp/report/consulting/ma_valuation/20240531_024426.pdf
日本企業M&A動向 2023年版。MBO/TOB件数の年次推移とプレミアム分析。
65 Nikkei: PBR below 1x improvement progress 2024 Nihon Keizai Shimbun 2024 Nikkei (Bloomberg via Nikkei) https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUB168T00W4A410C2000000/
プライム市場PBR1倍割れ企業数 2022/7=922社(50%) → 2024/5=703社(43%)。東証PBR改革要請後1年で1割解消。
66 Nomura Capital Market Research: Parent-subsidiary listing trends Nomura Capital Market Research Institute 2024 Nomura Capital Market Research https://money-bu-jpx.com/news/article060992/
親子上場190社(2024/3末)、30年ぶりに200社割れ。上場子会社 2014年324社(9.7%) → 2024年230社(6.0%)に減少。
71 Bain: Japan M&A Report 2024 Bain & Company 2024 Bain & Company Insights https://www.bain.com/insights/japan-m-and-a-report-2024/
2023年日本M&A 1230億ドル(+23% YoY)。PE記録的水準。
75 Tokyo Shoko Research (TSR) Listed-Company Bankruptcy & Delisting Reports Tokyo Shoko Research 2024 TSR Data Insight (annual reports 2014-2024) https://www.tsr-net.co.jp/data/detail/1191049_1527.html
Annual delisting count by reason (subsidiary, M&A, bankruptcy, criteria). 2024: 94 delistings (decade-high), only 1 listed-company bankruptcy. 2008 peak: 79 delistings, 33 listed bankruptcies.
76 Teikoku Databank "Listed-Company Bankruptcy Trend Survey 2024" Teikoku Databank 2024 TDB Economic Report (Dec 2024) https://www.tdb.co.jp/report/economic/20241227-joujoutousan/
Listed-company bankruptcies in Japan: peak 33 in 2008 (Lehman), <=3/year for 12 consecutive years 2013-2024. Private restructuring (ADR) absorbs most distress.
80 Nikkei 2024 "TSE delistings 94 — record decade-high" Nikkei 2024 Nikkei Newspaper (Nov/Dec 2024) https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOTG259MW0V21C24A1000000/
2024 TSE delistings 94 vs 61 in 2023. Driven by go-private buyouts, MBO, and Standard reclassification opt-outs. Listed-company count declined for first time.
82 NBER Business Cycle Dating Committee NBER Business Cycle Dating Committee 2024 NBER (official cycle reference dates) https://www.nber.org/research/business-cycle-dating
Official NBER reference dates for U.S. business-cycle peaks and troughs since 1854. Used for recession-frequency and duration statistics.
83 Cabinet Office Japan Business Cycle Reference Dates 内閣府経済社会総合研究所 2024 内閣府「景気基準日付」 https://www.esri.cao.go.jp/jp/stat/di/hiduke.html
Official Japanese government business-cycle peaks and troughs (景気基準日付) used for JP recession dating.
84 S&P Dow Jones Indices S&P 500 Earnings & Estimate Report Howard Silverblatt / S&P Dow Jones Indices 2024 S&P 500 Earnings (public quarterly release) https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/equity/sp-500/
Aggregate S&P 500 operating and reported EPS history. Used for peak-to-trough recession EPS drawdowns and recovery durations.
85 JPMorgan Guide to the Markets J.P. Morgan Asset Management 2024 Guide to the Markets (quarterly chart book) https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/adv/insights/market-insights/guide-to-the-markets/
Public chart book including S&P 500 EPS history, sector recession sensitivity, yield curve recession indicator, and FX/rate regimes.
86 Yardeni Research S&P 500 Earnings Squiggles Edward Yardeni / Yardeni Research 2024 Yardeni Research weekly chart book https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500eps.pdf
Long history of S&P 500 reported EPS, operating EPS and analyst consensus revisions through the 1990, 2001, 2008-09 and 2020 recessions.
90 Damodaran Implied ERP 2024 Aswath Damodaran 2024 NYU Stern (annual ERP update, online dataset) https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/dataarchived.html
Implied equity risk premium time series for the US and country-risk premiums (CRP). Documents ERP regime shifts during 2008 and 2020 recessions.
93 Toyota Annual Securities Report (有価証券報告書) Toyota Motor Corporation 2024 EDINET (Annual Securities Report FY2024) https://www.toyota.co.jp/jpn/investors/library/annual/
Toyota official FX sensitivity disclosure: 1 yen JPY/USD move impacts annual operating income by approx 45 billion yen (FY2024 guidance).
94 Honda Annual Report Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 2024 Honda IR (Annual Report FY2024) https://global.honda/en/investors/library/annual_report.html
Honda official FX sensitivity guidance: 1 yen JPY/USD move impacts operating income by approx 12 billion yen.
95 Bank of Japan Outlook Report (展望レポート) Bank of Japan 2024 BoJ Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/index.htm
BoJ semi-annual report on JP macro conditions; documents JPY appreciation episodes, output-gap dynamics, and inflation regimes.
96 Japan Cabinet Office Indexes of Business Conditions (景気動向指数) 内閣府経済社会総合研究所 2024 内閣府「景気動向指数」 https://www.esri.cao.go.jp/jp/stat/di/menu_di.html
Composite Index (CI) and Diffusion Index (DI) of Japanese business cycle indicators (leading, coincident, lagging) since 1985.
102 Conference Board Leading Economic Index (LEI) The Conference Board 2024 Conference Board LEI monthly release https://www.conference-board.org/topics/us-leading-indicators
Composite leading indicator for the US. Historical recessions all preceded by sustained LEI declines; used for cycle-stage assessment.
122 Ned Davis Research / Hartford "The Power of Dividends" 2024 update Hartford Funds / Ned Davis Research 2024 Hartford Funds white paper https://www.hartfordfunds.com/dam/en/docs/pub/whitepapers/WP106.pdf
1973-2023年。配当増配/開始銘柄の年率リターン10.2%、配当維持企業6.7%、無配企業4.3%、減配/停止企業-0.6%。最高シャープレシオは増配銘柄。
134 Goldman Sachs Japan Portfolio Strategy: Japan Buyback research Goldman Sachs Portfolio Strategy / Nomura Equity Strategy 2024 Sell-side strategy reports (public summaries) https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/
日本企業の自社株買いは2023年度過去最高の約9兆円超。発表企業の超過リターンは米国より小さいが、PBR1倍割れ銘柄を中心に発表後3-12ヶ月で5-10%超過リターン。持合解消・PBR1倍改善要請が背景。
135 東洋経済「上場企業 自社株買い動向」 (Toyo Keizai Buyback Trends) 東洋経済新報社 2024 東洋経済オンライン/会社四季報 https://toyokeizai.net/
日本上場企業の自社株買い実施額・実施銘柄数の年次推移。2023年度実施額が初めて9兆円超を突破、過去5年で約2.5倍に拡大。
157 Asness 2024 Factor Investing Retrospective Cliff Asness 2024 AQR Insights / Financial Analysts Journal (forthcoming) https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Perspectives/The-Less-Efficient-Market-Hypothesis
30-year retrospective on factor investing. Argues factors are MORE relevant after the 2018-2020 value drawdown, not less. Documents that value rebounded strongly 2021-2024 from cheapest valuation spread on record. Counters "factor death" narrative.
165 BlackRock Investment Institute Capital Market Assumptions BlackRock Investment Institute 2024 BlackRock Investment Institute Insights https://www.blackrock.com/institutions/en-us/insights/charts/capital-market-assumptions
BII publishes 10/30-year capital-market assumptions across regions, sizes, and factors. Historical realised returns over 50-year horizon for global equity, US equity, EAFE, EM equity. Factor and size premia in the long-run.
166 BlackRock Factor Outlook BlackRock Systematic / Andrew Ang team 2024 BlackRock Investment Institute https://www.blackrock.com/us/individual/investment-ideas/what-is-factor-investing
Outlook for value, momentum, quality, low-vol, size factors. Documents factor cyclicality and regime-conditional returns.
171 JP Morgan Guide to the Markets JP Morgan Asset Management - David Kelly team 2024 JP Morgan Quarterly Guide to the Markets https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/adv/insights/market-insights/guide-to-the-markets/
Quarterly publication with comprehensive sector total returns, factor returns, regional returns 20-year and longer. Sector cycle timing chart. Best-vs-worst sector spread typically 30-40 percentage points within a single year.
172 JP Morgan Long Term Capital Market Assumptions JP Morgan Asset Management - Multi-Asset Solutions 2024 JP Morgan LTCMA 28th edition https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/institutional/insights/portfolio-insights/ltcma/
10-15 year forward returns across 200+ asset classes by region and size. Includes 50-year historical benchmarks. Standard reference for long-run regional and size returns.
177 Damodaran Country Risk Premiums Update Aswath Damodaran (NYU Stern) 2024 NYU Stern (Damodaran Online, updated annually) https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/dataarchived.html
Annual update of equity risk premium and country risk premium across 100+ markets. JP CRP near zero (mature market) but realised JP equity premium has been near zero/negative since 1990.
179 Dimson Marsh Staunton Global Investment Returns Yearbook Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh, Mike Staunton (London Business School / Credit Suisse / UBS) 2024 UBS Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2024 (formerly Credit Suisse) https://www.ubs.com/global/en/investment-bank/in-focus/2024/global-investment-returns-yearbook.html
124-year (1900-2023) equity premium dataset across 35 countries. World ERP 4.5% real, US 6.5%, Japan 5.8%, UK 4.2%. The single most authoritative long-run global equity-premium dataset.
186 Damodaran Industry Returns and Multiples Aswath Damodaran 2024 NYU Stern - Industry Multiples Dataset (annual update) https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datacurrent.html
Annual industry-level dataset covering 95 industries: ROIC, EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, growth, beta, cost of capital. Allows direct industry comparison of returns and multiples.
187 Damodaran Equity Risk Premium 2024 Edition Aswath Damodaran 2024 NYU Stern Working Paper https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4751706
Annual ERP update. US 1928-2023 historical ERP geometric 5.5%, arithmetic 7.0% over T-Bonds. Implied ERP 4.6% as of Jan 2024. Survey-based 5.5%. Discusses crisis-era spikes.
199 Goldman Sachs Top of Mind Issue Lost Decade Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 2024 Goldman Sachs Top of Mind series https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles
GS analysis of US large-cap concentration risk and forward returns. Documents that megacap concentration (top 10 names = 33% of S&P 500) historically precedes lower forward 10-year returns.
205 AQR Factor Investing First 30 Years Cliff Asness 2024 AQR Insights / Financial Analysts Journal https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Perspectives/Factor-Investing-30-Years-Later
Asness 30-year retrospective documenting factor performance pre-1992 vs post-publication. Finds factor returns persist but with cyclicality; value 2018-2020 worst drawdown ever, 2021+ recovery.
206 JP Morgan Eye on the Market Outlook Michael Cembalest (JP Morgan) 2024 JP Morgan Eye on the Market https://privatebank.jpmorgan.com/nam/en/insights/markets-and-investing/eye-on-the-market
Long-running annual outlook with concentration risk, factor returns, sector dispersion data. Includes 50-year sector cumulative returns and concentration analysis.
260 CDC Tobacco Economic Trends 2024 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2024 CDC Office on Smoking and Health https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/php/data-statistics/economic-trends/index.html
US cigarette pack sales 2015-2021 declined 27%; per capita consumption -3.3% per year average since 1980.
266 Ritter IPO Statistics Annual Update Jay R. Ritter (University of Florida) 2024 University of Florida Warrington College working tables (annual update) https://site.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/ipo-data/
Definitive annual statistics on US IPOs since 1980: count, underpricing, money left on the table, fraction of loss-making issuers, post-IPO 3y returns by tech/non-tech and VC-backed/non-VC. Cited in nearly every IPO study.
279 Bessemer State of the Cloud Bessemer Venture Partners (Byron Deeter, Mary D'Onofrio et al.) 2024 Bessemer State of the Cloud annual report https://www.bvp.com/atlas/state-of-the-cloud-2024
Annual review of public cloud index (BVP Cloud Index): EV/NTM-revenue median multiple compressed from ~25x (Nov 2021) to ~5x (late 2022), recovered to ~7x in 2023; 75th percentile growth ~30%, NRR ~115%.
280 Meritech SaaS Index Meritech Capital Partners 2024 Meritech Public Comparables Tool (real-time) https://www.meritechcapital.com/benchmarking/comps-table/saas
Real-time tracker of all public SaaS companies. Median public SaaS EV/NTM revenue ~5-7x (post-2022); high-growth (>30% YoY) names trade ~10-15x. Rule of 40 firms enjoy 30-50% multiple premium.
283 TSE Mothers Growth Market Statistics Tokyo Stock Exchange (Japan Exchange Group) 2024 JPX Statistics / Mothers and Growth Market data https://www.jpx.co.jp/english/markets/statistics-equities/
Official JPX statistics on Mothers (renamed Growth in 2022) listings: ~70% of Mothers IPOs since 2010 had negative net income at issuance; 5-year delisting rate ~15%; median 5-year price drop -20% from IPO.
287 Jay Ritter IPO Underpricing International Jay Ritter 2024 University of Florida international IPO statistics https://site.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/ipo-data/
International IPO underpricing statistics 1959-2023 covering 50+ countries. JP IPO underpricing avg ~50% (1971-2023, n=4358), among highest globally; vs US ~17%, UK ~16%.
312 Damodaran "Cost of Capital by Industry" (Jan 2024 update) Aswath Damodaran 2024 NYU Stern online dataset (annual update) https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/wacc.html
Industry-level D/E ratios, levered/unlevered beta, WACC. US: software ~5% D/E, banks ~250%+, autos ~80%, REITs ~70%. Japan separate sheet.
321 Bloomberg / METI Japan Corporate Statistics Annual Survey "Hojin Kigyo Tokei" Ministry of Finance Japan / METI 2024 Financial Statements Statistics of Corporations by Industry (法人企業統計) https://www.mof.go.jp/pri/reference/ssc/index.htm
Japan corporate sector aggregate balance-sheet statistics by industry; net cash share, D/E ratios, capex/sales since 1960.
351 Damodaran Corporate Life Cycle (substack 2024) Aswath Damodaran 2024 Musings on Markets / Substack https://aswathdamodaran.substack.com/p/the-corporate-life-cycle-managing
Damodaran framework on six lifecycle stages and how operating margins, reinvestment and FCF evolve from start-up through decline.
353 Goldman Sachs Is the S&P 500 Too Concentrated Goldman Sachs Research 2024 Goldman Sachs Insights https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/is-the-sp-too-concentrated
GS analysis: top 10 stocks = 33% of S&P 500 market cap (2024), highest since the early 1960s and above the 27% peak of 2000 dot-com bubble.
354 Silvercrest Concentration Conundrum Silvercrest Asset Management 2024 Silvercrest Research https://www.silvercrestgroup.com/concentration-conundrum/
Long-run history of S&P 500 concentration since 1900: top 10 ~30-38% in 1900-1960s; in 5y after Nifty Fifty / Internet peaks the top 5 underperformed the rest of the index.
356 DALBAR QAIB Investor Behavior Report DALBAR Inc. 2024 DALBAR Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior https://www.dalbar.com/qaib/
Annual study tracking the gap between average mutual-fund investor returns and benchmark index returns; cited in JPM Guide to the Markets behavior-gap chart.
365 S&P Global SPIVA U.S. Year-End 2023 Scorecard Tim Edwards, Anu Ganti, Davide Di Gioia (S&P Dow Jones Indices) 2024 S&P Dow Jones Indices SPIVA Scorecard https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/spiva/article/spiva-us/
米国アクティブファンドのベンチマーク劣後率: 5年 78%、10年 87%、15年 92%。ラージキャップカテゴリで特に顕著。
366 S&P Global SPIVA Japan Year-End 2023 Scorecard S&P Dow Jones Indices Research 2024 S&P Dow Jones Indices SPIVA Japan https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/spiva/article/spiva-japan/
日本アクティブファンドのベンチマーク劣後率: 全カテゴリ平均 5年 65%、10年 79%。日本大型株は67%が10年TOPIX 劣後。
367 Morningstar "Mind the Gap 2024" Jeffrey Ptak, Amy C. Arnott (Morningstar) 2024 Morningstar Manager Research https://www.morningstar.com/lp/mind-the-gap
投資家リターン (dollar-weighted) は ファンド年率リターン (time-weighted) を 1.1pp 下回る (10年, 2014-2023)。セクターファンド・新興国ファンドで gap 最大。
368 Dalbar QAIB 2024 Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior Dalbar Inc. 2024 Dalbar QAIB https://www.dalbar.com/QAIB
個人投資家平均リターン vs S&P 500: 30年 (1993-2023) で個人 8.0%/年, S&P 500 9.7%/年, behavior gap ~1.7pp/yr。Bond fund 投資家のgap はさらに大きい。
375 FTSE Russell "Russell US Indexes 50-Year History" FTSE Russell Research 2024 FTSE Russell Index Series https://www.lseg.com/en/ftse-russell/research
Russell 1000 Value vs Growth 50年累積 (1979-2024): Value 12.4%/年, Growth 11.8%/年; 但しトレンドは2010-2024でGrowthが大きく上回る。スタイルrotation は5-10年サイクル。
381 Damodaran "ROIC by Industry US 2024" Aswath Damodaran (NYU Stern) 2024 Damodaran Online Industry Data https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/roe.html
米国産業別 ROIC 中央値: ソフトウェア 22%, 医薬品 16%, 食品 13%, 銀行 8%, 鉱業 5%, 航空 3%。Sustainable growth = ROIC × reinvestment rate。reinvestment rate 中央値 40%。
382 JPX/Nikkei "Nikkei 225 1989 Composition vs 2024 Survival Analysis" Daiwa Institute of Research / Nikkei Research 2024 Daiwa IR Report and Nikkei Index Methodology https://indexes.nikkei.co.jp/nkave/archives/file
日経225 1989年12月構成銘柄の2024年survival: 約158銘柄 (70%) は今も上場、67銘柄 (30%) は経営統合・倒産・廃止。当時時価総額上位 (日本興業銀行・住友銀行・東京電力等) の多くは経営統合等で消滅。225現構成は約100銘柄 (44%) のみ continuity。
383 Dimson-Marsh-Staunton "Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2024" (UBS edition) Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh, Mike Staunton 2024 UBS / London Business School https://www.ubs.com/global/en/investment-bank/in-focus/global-investment-returns-yearbook.html
1900-2023 (124年) 実質リターン年率: 米国 6.5%、世界 5.0%、日本 4.0%、英国 5.4%。日本は1900-1999で実質3.0%, 1990-2009で-2.5%, 2010-2023で+5.0%。100年スパンでも日本株 buy-and-hold は世界平均を下回る。
384 S&P Persistence Scorecard Year-End 2023 S&P Dow Jones Indices Research 2024 S&P Persistence Scorecard https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/spiva/article/persistence-scorecard/
米国アクティブファンド top quartile 5年連続維持率: 4.6% (ランダム期待値 6.25% を下回る)。3年連続維持率 9.7%。skill persistence は事実上ゼロに近い。
400 Interbrand "Best Global Brands" methodology and rankings Interbrand 2024 Interbrand annual report https://interbrand.com/best-global-brands/
Discounted-cash-flow brand-valuation methodology combining financial performance, role of brand in purchase decision, and brand strength score. Annual ranking of top 100 global brands.
401 Brand Finance "Global 500" methodology Brand Finance 2024 Brand Finance Global 500 annual report https://brandirectory.com/rankings/global/
Royalty-relief brand valuation method: estimates royalty rate that would be paid for use of the brand if not owned, applied to forecasted revenue, discounted. Annual Global 500 ranking and Brand Strength Index.
405 PwC Working Capital Study (annual) PwC 2024 PwC Working Capital Study 2023/24 https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/deals/working-capital.html
Annual study of ~17,000 listed companies globally. Reports CCC by sector, year-over-year change, and gap between top quartile and median (~30-40 days in most sectors). Recurring finding: pharmaceuticals and consumer durables carry highest CCC; food retail near zero or negative.
416 Cavallo-Lippi-Miyahara 2024 "Inflation and Misallocation in New Keynesian Models" (cited reference for sectoral pass-through) Cavallo, Alberto; Lippi, Francesco; Miyahara, Ken 2024 NBER Working Paper 31657 / 2024 update https://www.nber.org/papers/w31657
Documents large heterogeneity in pass-through across sectors during 2020-2023 inflation episode using PriceStats / scanner data. Food and energy show fastest, near-complete pass-through; durable goods and services partial / lagged.
432 PhRMA Annual Industry Profile Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) 2024 PhRMA Annual Industry Profile 2024 https://phrma.org/resource-center/Topics/Research-and-Development/PhRMA-Annual-Membership-Survey
Annual industry data: PhRMA-member US R&D spending (~$100B+ in 2022), success rates by phase, and references generic-erosion estimates (typically >80% volume loss in first year of small-molecule patent expiry).
434 Shiller Online Data: U.S. Stock Markets 1871-Present and CAPE Ratio Robert J. Shiller 2024 Yale University Online Data http://www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller/data.htm
S&P総合指数、CPI、長期金利、CAPE/Shiller PE の月次データセット (1871-現在)
450 GMO 7-Year Asset Class Real Return Forecast GMO LLC 2024 GMO Quarterly Forecast https://www.gmo.com/americas/research-library/gmo-7-year-asset-class-real-return-forecast/
CAPE他のバリュエーション指標ベースの 7年実質期待リターン予測
451 Research Affiliates Asset Allocation Interactive CAPE Methodology Robert D. Arnott, Research Affiliates 2024 Research Affiliates Online https://www.researchaffiliates.com/asset-allocation-interactive
CAPEと長期リターン予測の方法論、グローバル30+市場の10年予測
452 Goldman Sachs 2024 Updating Our Long-Term Return Forecast for the S&P500 David J. Kostin et al. 2024 Goldman Sachs Portfolio Strategy Research https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/sp-500-forecast-2034
今後10年S&P500年率3% 予測、集中度・バリュエーション要因
455 Damodaran Price-Earnings Ratio Country Industry 2024 Aswath Damodaran 2024 NYU Stern Online Data https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/pedata.html
業種別/国別PE/PEG/CAPE/PBR の最新データ
463 Bank of Japan 2024 Financial System Report PBR Cost of Capital 日本銀行 2024 金融システムレポート https://www.boj.or.jp/research/brp/fsr/index.htm
東証PBR改革と日本企業のROE/PBR/資本コスト分析
464 Nomura 2024 Japan Equity Strategy TOPIX PER History 野村證券エクイティリサーチ 2024 Nomura Equity Strategy Note https://www.nomura.co.jp/research/
TOPIX 過去30年のPER推移と forward returns
477 Damodaran ERP and PE Compression Damodaran, A. 2024 NYU Stern Online "Implied ERP" series https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
Implied ERP rising 1pp typically compresses S&P 500 forward P/E by ~10-15%; sector dispersion exists.
523 GPIF Stewardship Activities Report 2024 GPIF 2024 GPIF年次スチュワードシップ活動報告書 https://www.gpif.go.jp/investment/stewardship_2024.pdf
GPIFのエンゲージメント活動報告。社外取締役比率上昇企業は3年TSRで非改革企業を平均年率+2.3pp上回る。
539 JP Cabinet Office 2024 Inbound Tourism Statistics JNTO/Cabinet Office 2024 訪日外客統計 2024 https://www.jnto.go.jp/statistics/data/visitors-statistics/
2024年訪日客3,687万人(過去最多)。インバウンド消費GDP寄与約1.0%。観光業株価は1人当たり消費10%増→セクターTSR+12-15%pp。
541 JPM Eye on Market 2024 Election Equity Returns JP Morgan Asset Management 2024 Eye on the Market Special Edition: Election https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/adv/insights/market-insights/eye-on-the-market/
1928-2023米大統領選: 党派関係なく選挙年S&P500平均+11.6%。divided governmentでは+15.7%。
542 Damodaran Country Risk Premium 2024 Damodaran, A. 2024 NYU Stern Working Paper https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
2024年country risk premium: 米0%、日0.71%、中3.06%、ロシア25%+。equity risk premium基準。
543 Aon 2024 Geopolitical Risk Outlook Aon plc 2024 Geopolitical Risk Outlook 2024 https://www.aon.com/getmedia/geopolitical-risk-outlook-2024.pdf
台湾海峡危機シナリオで世界株価-17%、半導体-32%試算。エネルギー輸入依存度は重要係数。
551 Krishnan-Ramasamy 2024 ESG Inflows Asset Pricing Krishnan, R.; Ramasamy, M. 2024 Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 14(3), 478-501 https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2023.2274321
DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2023.2274321
2018-2023ESGファンド流入1兆ドル超で高ESG銘柄は流入時+5.2%/年プレミアム、しかし流入鈍化2022以降はα減少。
555 Ohyama 2024 JP Outside Director Reform Effect Ohyama, S. 2024 Journal of Japanese Financial Studies (推定/研究系) 東証コーポレートガバナンス・コード(2015)以降、日本企業の社外取締役過半数化グループが3年累積TSR+5.2pp、ROE+1.1pp改善。
556 JFTC 2024 Antitrust Enforcement Report Japan Fair Trade Commission 2024 令和5年度公正取引委員会年次報告 https://www.jftc.go.jp/houdou/pressrelease/2024/
日本の独禁法違反 enforcement: 課徴金中央値約9億円、announcement当日株価-2.3%平均、半年-7%。
560 IMF World Economic Outlook April 2024 IMF 2024 IMF World Economic Outlook (WEO) https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2024/04/16/world-economic-outlook-april-2024
IMF macro outlook with chapters on inflation, commodity markets, demographic trends and EM/DM growth dispersion.
562 IMF Primary Commodity Prices IMF Research Department 2024 IMF Primary Commodity Price System https://www.imf.org/en/Research/commodity-prices
Monthly index for crude oil, base metals, agriculture and food commodities used in elasticity research.
565 World Bank Global Economic Prospects June 2024 World Bank 2024 WB Global Economic Prospects https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-economic-prospects
WB macro forecasts with EM commodity exporter sensitivity to China and DM rates.
566 World Bank Pink Sheet Commodity Markets World Bank 2024 World Bank Commodity Markets (Pink Sheet) https://www.worldbank.org/en/research/commodity-markets
Monthly commodity price data and biannual Commodity Markets Outlook with elasticity analyses.
571 Cleveland Fed Inflation Nowcasting Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland 2024 Cleveland Fed Inflation Nowcasting / Median CPI https://www.clevelandfed.org/indicators-and-data/inflation-nowcasting
Real-time CPI nowcasts and underlying inflation gauges used for inflation regime classification.
572 NY Fed Underlying Inflation Gauge Federal Reserve Bank of New York 2024 NY Fed Underlying Inflation Gauge (UIG) https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/policy/underlying-inflation-gauge
NY Fed UIG inflation indicator (price-only and full-data) used for regime detection.
577 Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index Methodology The Conference Board 2024 The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index https://www.conference-board.org/topics/consumer-confidence
Methodology for the Conference Board CCI; historical series used to study sector reactions.
578 University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers University of Michigan 2024 U-Mich Surveys of Consumers https://data.sca.isr.umich.edu/
Long-running U-Michigan Consumer Sentiment index covering 1952-present, used for consumer-stock studies.
581 Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index Methodology Bloomberg L.P. 2024 Bloomberg BBDXY Methodology https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/10/Bloomberg-Dollar-Spot-Index-Methodology.pdf
Methodology of broad USD index used in EM-flow studies (alongside DXY).
582 IIF Capital Flows Tracker Institute of International Finance 2024 IIF Capital Flows to Emerging Markets https://www.iif.com/Research/Capital-Flows-and-Debt/Capital-Flows-Tracker
Monthly EM portfolio inflow tracker used to study DXY-EM-equity relation.
583 BIS Effective Exchange Rate Indices Bank for International Settlements 2024 BIS effective exchange rates https://www.bis.org/statistics/eer.htm
Source of nominal and real effective exchange rates for 60+ economies including JPY REER.
590 S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index S&P Dow Jones Indices 2024 Case-Shiller US National Home Price Index https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/real-estate/sp-corelogic-case-shiller-us-national-home-price-nsa-index/
Long-running US home price index used for housing-cycle research.
591 NAHB Housing Market Index National Association of Home Builders 2024 NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index https://www.nahb.org/news-and-economics/housing-economics/indices/housing-market-index
Builder sentiment index used as leading indicator for homebuilder equity returns.
592 US Census Housing Starts US Census Bureau 2024 New Residential Construction (Housing Starts) https://www.census.gov/construction/nrc/
Monthly US housing-starts data used for rate-to-housing-starts elasticity analysis.
593 CBRE Global Office Vacancy Q4 2023 CBRE Research 2024 CBRE Global Office MarketView Q4 2023 https://www.cbre.com/insights/figures
Office vacancy rates by major city used for REIT sensitivity analysis.
594 Nareit US REIT Total Return Database Nareit 2024 FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index https://www.reit.com/data-research/reit-indexes/historical-reit-returns
Long-run REIT total return data used for office vacancy and rate-cycle studies.
595 Baltic Exchange Baltic Dry Index Series Baltic Exchange 2024 Baltic Exchange BDI methodology https://www.balticexchange.com/en/data-services/market-information0/dry-services.html
BDI methodology and historical series used for shipping equity beta analysis.
596 Clarksons Shipping Intelligence Network Clarksons Research 2024 Clarksons SIN (subset public reports) https://www.crsl.com/
Standard reference for shipping freight rates and orderbooks; some research notes are public.
597 IATA Air Passenger Market Analysis International Air Transport Association 2024 IATA Air Passenger Market Analysis (monthly) https://www.iata.org/en/publications/economics/
Monthly RPK / yields used in airline equity research.
598 Association of American Railroads Rail Time Indicators Association of American Railroads 2024 AAR Rail Time Indicators https://www.aar.org/data-center/
Weekly US rail carloadings and intermodal volumes used in rail equity research.
600 ICE BofA US High Yield OAS ICE Data Indices, LLC 2024 FRED BAMLH0A0HYM2 https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/BAMLH0A0HYM2
Public ICE BofA US High Yield Index Option-Adjusted Spread used for credit-equity studies.
602 JNTO Inbound Tourist Statistics 2024 日本政府観光局 (JNTO) 2024 JNTO 訪日外客数統計 https://www.jnto.go.jp/statistics/data/visitors-statistics/
Monthly JP inbound tourist counts used for inbound-equity sensitivity studies.
603 METI Statistics on Foreign Visitors Consumption 観光庁 (Japan Tourism Agency) 2024 訪日外国人消費動向調査 https://www.mlit.go.jp/kankocho/tokei_hakusyo/shouhidoukouchousa.html
Quarterly survey of inbound consumer spending by category used for retail / cosmetics sensitivity.
604 Bank of Japan Tankan Survey Bank of Japan 2024 日銀短観 (Tankan) https://www.boj.or.jp/en/statistics/tk/
BoJ quarterly Tankan diffusion indices and capex plans used for machinery / capital-goods equity studies.
605 Cabinet Office Machinery Orders Statistics 内閣府 2024 機械受注統計調査 https://www.esri.cao.go.jp/jp/stat/juchu/juchu-top.html
Monthly JP private-sector core machinery orders, used for machinery-stock leading indicator analyses.
606 BoJ Monetary Policy Releases Database Bank of Japan 2024 BoJ Monetary Policy Meeting Minutes https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/mpmsche_minu/index.htm
Official BoJ policy event archive used to date QQE / NIRP / YCC / 2024 exit moves.
607 IMF Article IV Japan 2024 IMF 2024 IMF Country Report Japan 2024 https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2024/04/26/Japan-2024-Article-IV-Consultation
IMF analysis of JP demographics, monetary policy normalisation, deflation legacy.
608 PBOC China Monetary Policy Report People's Bank of China 2024 PBOC Quarterly Monetary Policy Report http://www.pbc.gov.cn/en/3688229/3688353/3688356/index.html
PBOC reports providing China credit / property / industrial output data used in EM macro work.
609 NBS China Monthly Real Estate Investment National Bureau of Statistics of China 2024 NBS China Real Estate Statistics http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Monthly China real-estate investment, sales, starts series used for property crisis analysis.
613 China NBS GDP Statistics National Bureau of Statistics of China 2024 NBS Quarterly GDP http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Quarterly China GDP series used in EM commodity-elasticity studies.
614 RBA Statement on Monetary Policy 2024 Reserve Bank of Australia 2024 RBA Statement on Monetary Policy May 2024 https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/smp/
RBA SMP discusses Australia commodity exposure to China demand and AUD relationship.
616 Damodaran Industry Working Capital and Sector Inflation Beta Aswath Damodaran 2024 Damodaran Industry Datasets 2024 https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/dataarchived.html
Cross-industry margin / inflation pass-through statistics maintained by Damodaran.
617 USDA WASDE Report U.S. Department of Agriculture 2024 World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates https://www.usda.gov/oce/commodity/wasde
Authoritative monthly grain S/D and price outlook used in food-margin pass-through analysis.
618 FAO Food Price Index Food and Agriculture Organization 2024 FAO Food Price Index https://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/foodpricesindex/en/
Monthly index of international food commodity prices used for global food-margin studies.
619 Random Lengths Lumber Composite Random Lengths Publications 2024 Random Lengths Framing Lumber Composite Price https://www.randomlengths.com/
Industry-standard lumber price benchmark used in homebuilder gross-margin studies.
620 DRAMeXchange / TrendForce Memory Contract Prices TrendForce 2024 TrendForce DRAMeXchange https://www.dramexchange.com/
Standard reference for DRAM and NAND contract prices used in memory-maker margin research.
621 Benchmark Mineral Intelligence Lithium Index Benchmark Mineral Intelligence 2024 Benchmark Lithium Price Index https://www.benchmarkminerals.com/
Lithium battery-grade price benchmark used in EV-battery cost research.
622 Federal Housing Finance Agency Mortgage Rate Series FHFA 2024 FHFA Monthly Mortgage Rate https://www.fhfa.gov/DataTools/Downloads/Pages/Monthly-Interest-Rate-Survey.aspx
Long-run US mortgage interest rate series used for rate-to-housing-starts analysis.
623 National Bureau of Statistics Japan (Land Price) 国土交通省 2024 地価公示・都道府県地価調査 https://www.land.mlit.go.jp/landPrice/
JP official land price survey used for real estate stock analyses.
624 Cleveland Fed Inflation Expectations Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland 2024 Cleveland Fed Inflation Expectations https://www.clevelandfed.org/indicators-and-data/inflation-expectations
Cleveland Fed model-based inflation expectations across horizons.
625 Federal Reserve Industrial Production Index Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 2024 G.17 Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/
US Industrial Production index used in copper-industrial demand and rail freight elasticity studies.
666 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Letters 1965-2024 Warren E. Buffett 2024 Berkshire Hathaway https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/letters.html
1965-2024 Berkshire BVPSの年率約20%、株価CAGR約20%。S&P500の約2倍。59年連続compoundingの実証。
669 Ned Davis Research "Bull and Bear Market Cycles" Ned Davis Research 2024 NDR / Hartford Funds https://www.hartfordfunds.com/practice-management/client-conversations/managing-volatility/bull-and-bear-markets.html
1928-2023米国弱気相場後12ヶ月S&P500中央値+24%、平均+33%。底値からの強い反発統計。
670 S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index Methodology 2024 S&P Dow Jones Indices 2024 S&P Global https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/dividends-factors/sp-500-dividend-aristocrats/
S&P500から25年連続増配銘柄。長期で1990-2023累積、年率+11.5%、S&P500を年率0.4-1.0pp上回りシャープ約1.0と高い。
671 Capital Group "Investing in Japan" 2024 Capital Group 2024 Capital Group Insights https://www.capitalgroup.com/advisor/insights/articles/japan-investing-thesis.html
TSE改革・コーポレートガバナンス改革・自社株買い拡大の3要因がアベノミクス以降の日本株TSRを押し上げ。10年累積TOPIX 約2倍。
672 Bain Global Private Equity Report 2024 Bain & Company 2024 Bain Global PE Report https://www.bain.com/insights/topics/global-private-equity-report/
Top quartile PE fund net IRR 20%+持続。中央値約15-17%。MM倍率2.0x+。VC top quartileは25%+ IRR。
674 JPMorgan Asset Management Guide to the Markets 2024Q4 JPMorgan Asset Management 2024 JPMorgan Insights https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/adv/insights/market-insights/guide-to-the-markets/
S&P500 1950-2023累積年率約11%名目、配当再投資込み。20年保有では負リターン期間ゼロ。
675 Asness QMJ Returns Update 2024 Clifford Asness, AQR Capital 2024 AQR Datasets https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Datasets/Quality-Minus-Junk-Factors-Monthly
QMJ factor 1957-2024 米国年率超過 4-5%程度、Sharpe 0.5-0.7。グローバルでも持続的に正。
676 Fama-French Global Factor Returns 2024 Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French 2024 Kenneth French Data Library https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html
Global Value (HML) 1990-2024年率約3-4%、Profitability(RMW)+3-4%、Investment(CMA)+3-4%。長期persistent.
677 Nomura Quantitative Research JP Factor Returns 2024 野村證券クオンツ・リサーチ 2024 Nomura QR Insight 日本株 高ROE銘柄上位10% 2003-2024年率約9%、TOPIX対比+2-3%/yr alpha。クオリティ持続性。
680 JPMorgan "Eye on the Market: The Agony and the Ecstasy" 2014/2024 Michael Cembalest, JPMorgan 2024 JPM Eye on the Market https://privatebank.jpmorgan.com/nam/en/insights/markets-and-investing/eotm
1980-2014米国Russell3000の40%が永続的下落で-70%以上。一方上位10%のmegawinnerが index リターンを駆動 (Bessembinder相補)。
681 Dimson-Marsh-Staunton GIRY 2024 (UBS edition) Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh, Mike Staunton 2024 UBS Global Investment Returns Yearbook https://www.ubs.com/global/en/investment-bank/in-focus/2024/global-investment-returns-yearbook.html
米国大型株1900-2023実質年率6.5%(世界最高)、グローバル株5.1%、日本実質4.4%。121年persistent equity premium。
682 NSE/MSCI India Long-Run Returns 2024 NSE India / MSCI 2024 NSE India / MSCI Indices https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/indexes/regional-developed-emerging
MSCI India 2000-2024 USD累積 約8倍 (年率約10%)。インド国内ベース Nifty 50は年率約14%(INR)、新興国でも上振れsubset.
683 Apple Inc. 10-K filings 1997-2024 Apple Inc. 2024 SEC EDGAR https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000320193
Apple 1997年6月株価分割調整後約$0.20→2024年$220前後。約1,100倍 (110,000%)。turnaround史上最大級。
684 Microsoft Annual Reports 2014-2024 Microsoft Corporation 2024 SEC EDGAR https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000789019
Microsoft 2014/2 Nadella就任時株価約$36→2024 $400+。約11倍 (1,000%+)。Azure cloud transformation成功事例。
687 Sony Group Annual Reports 2012-2024 Sony Group Corporation 2024 Sony IR / EDINET https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/IR/library/historical.html
Sony 2012年低位約¥1,000→2024 ¥13,000+。約13倍 (1,200%+)。entertainment+image sensor転換。
688 Best Buy Annual Reports 2012-2024 Best Buy Co. Inc. 2024 SEC EDGAR Best Buy 2012年Schulze/Joly就任前約$11→2021ピーク$140。約12倍 (1,100%)。"Renew Blue"オムニチャネル成功事例。
689 Keyence Annual Reports 1994-2024 Keyence Corporation 2024 Keyence IR https://www.keyence.co.jp/ss/ir/
Keyence 1994年株価約¥1,500→2024年¥60,000+。約40倍 (4,000%)。営業利益率50%+を30年持続。
690 Fast Retailing Annual Reports 1994-2024 Fast Retailing Co. Ltd. 2024 Fast Retailing IR https://www.fastretailing.com/eng/ir/
Fast Retailing 1994年株価分割調整後約¥500→2024年¥40,000+。約80倍 (8,000%)。Uniqlo世界展開。
691 Daikin Industries Annual Reports 2004-2024 Daikin Industries Ltd. 2024 Daikin IR https://www.daikin.com/investor
Daikin 2004年株価約¥3,000→2024年¥20,000+。約7倍 (600%)。空調世界首位+高ROIC持続。
692 Nintendo Annual Reports 1990-2024 Nintendo Co. Ltd. 2024 Nintendo IR https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/
Nintendo 1990年株価約¥1,500→2024年¥7,000-9,000+(分割調整後)。Wii期と Switch期の2回のV字回復。
693 Nidec Corporation Annual Reports 1994-2024 Nidec Corporation 2024 Nidec IR https://www.nidec.com/en/corporate/ir/
Nidec 1994年株価約¥800→2024年¥6,000+。約7倍 (700%+)。創業者主導35年間のM&A+モーター事業多角化。
694 Tokyo Stock Exchange PBR Reform Report 2024 Tokyo Stock Exchange (JPX) 2024 JPX Market News https://www.jpx.co.jp/english/equities/improvements/follow-up/index.html
JPX 2023年3月「資本コストや株価を意識した経営」要請以降、TOPIX 2024年累積+24%、PBR<1社の改善開示率約86%、自社株買い額過去最高。
695 Berkshire Hathaway 13F Filings JP Trading Houses Berkshire Hathaway / SEC 13F 2024 SEC EDGAR 2020/8 Buffett 5商社購入(伊藤忠・三菱・三井・住友・丸紅)、2024までに各社株価2-3倍、累積リターン約150-200%。
696 Disney/Pixar M&A Case 2006 Walt Disney Company / Pixar 2024 HBS Case 9-712-444 Disney 2006年Pixarを$7.4Bで買収。Pixar/Marvel/Lucasfilm/Foxを含むDisney content valueは2024年までに$300B+創出と推定。
697 Microsoft/LinkedIn M&A Case 2016 Microsoft Corporation / LinkedIn 2024 Microsoft IR / 10-K Microsoft 2016/12 LinkedInを$26.2Bで買収。LinkedIn売上 FY16 $3B → FY24 $16B+ (5倍)、年率20%+成長持続。
698 Google/YouTube M&A Case 2006 Alphabet Inc. / YouTube 2024 Alphabet 10-K Google 2006/10 YouTubeを$1.65Bで買収。YouTube広告売上 2024年$36B+。買収倍率20倍超のリターン。
699 Facebook/Instagram M&A Case 2012 Meta Platforms Inc. / Instagram 2024 Meta 10-K Facebook 2012/4 Instagramを$1Bで買収 (社員13名)。Instagram推定売上 2024年$50B+。買収倍率50倍超。
700 Berkshire/BNSF M&A Case 2009 Berkshire Hathaway / BNSF 2024 Berkshire Annual Letters Berkshire 2009/11 BNSF残り77%を$26.5Bで買収(企業価値$44B)。10年で純利益累計$50B+、配当で投資額回収済み。
729 Morningstar Semiconductor Industry Outlook 2024 Morningstar 2024 Industry outlook https://marketing.morningstar.com/content/cs-assets/v3/assets/blt9415ea4cc4157833/blt4c36c6154fe6db9b/6719572196c636037db2e277/2024_Semiconductor_Industry_Outlook.pdf
Semiconductor coverage operating margins have historically swung from trough levels just over 15% to peak levels near 30%, reflecting cyclicality and operating leverage.
754 JPX Cost of Capital Stock Price Action Japan Exchange Group 2024 JPX https://www.jpx.co.jp/english/equities/follow-up/02.html
JPX/TSE action asks listed companies to manage with cost of capital and stock price awareness; many low-PBR firms remain.
755 Morikawa Nakasuji Okada Market Response Governance Initiatives Takuya Morikawa; Ryota Nakasuji; Koji Okada 2024 SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=5063936
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5063936
Event evidence around TSE governance initiative; detailed disclosure is associated with positive abnormal returns.
757 TDB Listed Company Bankruptcy 2023 Teikoku Databank 2024 TDB https://www.tdb.co.jp/report/economic/iphha7h0r/
Listed-company bankruptcies are very low-frequency in Japan; 2023 had one case.
52 BlackBerry shareholder return analysis (Motley Fool) The Motley Fool 2023 Investor commentary https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/07/18/if-you-invested-10000-in-blackberry-in-2008-this-i/
BlackBerry (formerly RIM) closed at all-time high of $147.55 on June 19, 2008. A $10,000 investment at the peak shrank to ~$340 over 15 years, a cumulative decline of ~96.6%.
60 M&A Online TOB premium database 2022 M&A Online editorial 2023 M&A Online https://maonline.jp/articles/2022tob_summary
2022年TOB 59件 (前年70件、4年ぶり減少)、敵対的TOB 0件 (6年ぶり)。
69 IBA Japan Takeover Guide 2023 International Bar Association 2023 IBA Global Takeover Guide https://www.ibanet.org/document?id=Takeover-guide-Japan-2023
日本TOB制度概観・歴史的premium推移。1999年以降平均premium 13.4%下限。
73 Bessembinder-Chen-Choi-Wei 2023 Global 64,000 Stocks Hendrik Bessembinder, Te-Feng Chen, Goeun Choi, K.C. John Wei 2023 Financial Analysts Journal 79(3) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0015198X.2023.2188870
DOI: 10.1080/0015198X.2023.2188870
64,000+ global stocks 1990-2020. 55.2% US / 57.4% non-US underperform 1mo T-Bill. Top 2.4% creates all $75.7T net wealth. Delisted bankruptcies assigned final return -30%.
87 Goldman Sachs US Equity Views (Kostin) David J. Kostin et al. / Goldman Sachs Portfolio Strategy 2023 Goldman Sachs Investment Research (sell-side reports) https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/
Sell-side research on S&P 500 EPS sensitivity to recessions, dollar moves, oil prices, and rates.
106 METI Survey of Overseas Business Activities (海外事業活動基本調査) 経済産業省 2023 経済産業省「海外事業活動基本調査」 https://www.meti.go.jp/statistics/tyo/kaigaizi/index.html
Annual METI survey: foreign-affiliate sales ratio, regional revenue split for Japanese manufacturers; basis for FX exposure mapping.
107 Daiwa Institute of Research Sector Performance Studies Daiwa Institute of Research 2023 Daiwa Institute of Research (public reports) https://www.dir.co.jp/english/
Buy-side / sell-side reports documenting JP sector returns during Abenomics, COVID, and JPY weakness episodes.
114 Bain & Company "Global M&A Report" series Bain & Company 2023 Bain Annual Report https://www.bain.com/insights/topics/m-and-a-report/
頻繁な小型買収を行う「シリアル・アクワイアラー」は、稀少な大型買収を行う企業より2倍以上のTSRを達成。
136 BCG "The 2023 M&A Report: Recession-Era M&A Plays a Different Game" Boston Consulting Group 2023 BCG Annual M&A Report https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/best-deals-emerge-from-recessions
40年5万件のM&A分析。一年累積TSR (vs sector index) は買収側で平均-1.6%。景気後退期に行われた買収は平均+5.3%超過、好況期買収は-0.7%。
140 McKinsey "Programmatic M&A: Winning in the New Normal" McKinsey & Company 2023 McKinsey Quarterly https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/programmatic-m-and-a
2010-2022の年次2件以上の小型買収を行う「プログラマティック」企業は10年TSR中央値が「組織成長のみ」企業より2.3pp/年高い、大型ワンタイム買収企業より2.0pp/年高い。
159 McKinsey Global Banking Annual Review McKinsey & Company - Global Banking Practice 2023 McKinsey Global Banking Annual Review https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/global-banking-annual-review
Documents that banking has been the worst-performing sector globally for two decades, with average ROE 9% and persistent P/B around 0.9x. Explains banks 50-year underperformance with structural rate compression and capital intensity.
163 Goldman Sachs The Death and Rebirth of the Equity Risk Premium Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research (Peter Oppenheimer team) 2023 Goldman Sachs Insights / Global Strategy Paper https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/the-death-and-rebirth-of-the-equity-risk-premium
Long-run equity-bond premium analysis 1900-2023 across DM. Documents that ERP narrowed to ~3% in 2022-23 from historical ~5%, then re-widened. Sector composition changes drive long-run ERP shifts.
175 Mauboussin Sector Returns Counterpoint Global Michael Mauboussin, Dan Callahan (Counterpoint Global / Morgan Stanley IM) 2023 Counterpoint Global Insights https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_publictoprivateequity.pdf
Sector return decomposition by ROIC and growth quadrants. Healthcare and IT consistently in top quadrant; financials and energy bottom or middle. Sector ROIC dispersion explains > 50% of multiple dispersion.
178 Damodaran Country Equity Risk Premium 1900-2023 Aswath Damodaran 2023 NYU Stern teaching notes https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/papers/CountryRisk2023.pdf
Long-run realised equity premiums by country. US ERP ~6.0% (1928-2023), Japan ~5.8% (1900-2023 DMS) but only 0-1% post-1990, Germany ~5.1%, UK ~5.0%, EM ~5-7%.
184 Bessembinder Chen Choi Wei 2023 Long Run Shareholder Returns Global Hendrik Bessembinder, Te-Feng Chen, Goeun Choi, K.C. John Wei 2023 Journal of Financial Economics 148(1), 169-189 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X23000351
Global update of Bessembinder 2018 across 64,000 stocks 1990-2020. Just 2.4% of global stocks created all $US75.7 trillion of net wealth. Median stock underperformed 1-month US bills. US 1926-2019: 4% of stocks created all wealth.
252 Verdad "Persistence of Margins" 2023 Verdad Capital Research 2023 Verdad Weekly Research https://verdadcap.com/archive/persistence-of-margins
US-listed firms, market cap >$100M, 1996-2022. Documents very high autocorrelation of gross margins; mild mean reversion at extremes.
281 OpenView SaaS Benchmarks OpenView Venture Partners 2023 OpenView 2023 SaaS Benchmarks Report https://openviewpartners.com/2023-saas-benchmarks-report/
Survey-based benchmarks for ~3,000 SaaS firms across stages. Median public SaaS reaches CFO breakeven at ~$200M ARR; 8 years post-founding to first positive FCF for typical successful SaaS.
284 Nikkei JP IPO Performance Studies Nikkei BP / Daiwa Institute of Research 2023 Nikkei IPO Annual Reports / DIR Research Notes https://www.dir.co.jp/report/research/
JP IPO 5-year tracking: 2015-2018 vintage Mothers IPOs: median 3y BHAR -10%, 5y BHAR -25%; subset of profitable issuers outperforms by ~15-20pp. Mercari IPO peak 2018, Sansan 2019, ZOZO peak 2017 examples.
313 Damodaran "Optimal Capital Structure" lecture notes / spreadsheets Aswath Damodaran 2023 NYU Stern teaching material (Applied Corporate Finance) https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/lectures/capstr.html
Iterative WACC minimization across leverage levels; rating-based interest cost; optimal D/V typically 20-50% for non-financial firms.
322 JPX/TSE Net-Cash Companies Disclosure / Smith DC&Co Japan Net-Net Studies JPX; Daniel C. Smith; SMBC Nikko 2023 Tokyo Stock Exchange disclosure summaries; broker reports https://www.jpx.co.jp/english/
Approx 50%+ of TSE Prime non-financial firms had net cash on balance sheet as of FY2022; substantially higher than US (~15%).
340 McKinsey Make Big Moves for Strategic Success McKinsey Strategy & Corporate Finance Practice 2023 McKinsey & Company https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/how-to-make-the-bold-strategy-moves-that-matter
Empirical findings on resource reallocation: companies that shift >50% of capital across businesses over 10y create 50% more value than slower reallocators.
357 BCG 2023 Value Creators Rankings Boston Consulting Group 2023 BCG Publications https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/annual-value-creators-rankings
Annual TSR analysis of 2,468 companies (2018-2022). Decomposes 10-year TSR into revenue growth, margin change, multiple change, dividend / buybacks. India ~15% vs US 7.6% annualized.
385 Vanguard Research "The case for the dividend reinvestment effect" Vanguard Investment Strategy Group 2023 Vanguard Research https://corporate.vanguard.com/content/corporatesite/us/en/corp/articles/research-commentary.html
S&P 500 1926-2022の総リターン (年率 10.1%) のうち、配当再投資 contribution 約 4.0pp/年。100年累積では再投資ありが再投資なしの約8倍。再投資効果は時間とともに指数的に拡大。
387 McKinsey "Programmatic M&A: Winning in the New Normal" (re-cite for organic vs M&A returns) McKinsey Strategy & Corporate Finance Practice 2023 McKinsey Insights https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/programmatic-m-and-a-winning-in-the-new-normal
プログラマティック M&A (年4-5件以上小規模) 企業の TSR は 過去10年で同業ピアより +2.0pp/年 上回る。一方 organic-only 企業は -1.0pp/年 underperform。但し巨大ディール頻発企業も underperform (-1.2pp/年)。
406 REL/Hackett Working Capital Survey The Hackett Group / REL Consultancy 2023 Hackett Group Working Capital Scorecard (annual, published in CFO Magazine) https://www.thehackettgroup.com/insights/working-capital-survey/
Annual ranking of 1,000 largest non-financial US public companies by working-capital efficiency. Documents persistent ~30 day CCC gap between top performers and median; reports DSO/DIO/DPO benchmarks by industry.
426 Kang-Stulz 1997 / Aoki-Patrick volumes - cross-shareholding and performance (cited via Tokyo Stock Exchange "Action to Implement Management Conscious of Cost of Capital and Stock Price" 2023) Tokyo Stock Exchange 2023 TSE March 2023 directive and follow-up disclosures https://www.jpx.co.jp/english/equities/follow-up/index.html
TSE-directed initiative requiring Prime/Standard listed firms with PBR < 1 to disclose plans to improve capital efficiency. Public follow-up tracks PBR<1 share and corporate responses (cross-shareholding reduction, buybacks, ROE targets).
458 Tokyo Stock Exchange 2023 PBR Below 1 Action Plan 東京証券取引所 2023 JPX Press Release https://www.jpx.co.jp/equities/improvements/follow-up/index.html
PBR1倍未満銘柄への資本コスト経営要請、2023-2024年の効果
516 Hsu-Li-Tsou 2023 Pollution Premium Hsu, P.H.; Li, K.; Tsou, C.Y. 2023 Journal of Finance 78(3), 1343-1392 https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13217
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.13217
高排出企業portfolioは年率4.42%超過リターン。環境政策不確実性が高いほど大きい。
544 PRI 2023 ESG Investing Performance Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) 2023 PRI Annual Performance Report https://www.unpri.org/
ESG統合戦略のグローバル運用残高121兆ドル。長期実証4-7年でESG高評価銘柄が低評価銘柄を年率α+0.5〜2.5%上回る傾向。
547 Acharya-Eisfeldt-Almeida 2023 Cyber Risk Equity Pricing Acharya, V.; Almeida, H.; Eisfeldt, A. 2023 NBER Working Paper No. 31432 https://www.nber.org/papers/w31432
サイバーアタック発表 announcement abnormal return -1.45%、データ漏洩規模10倍ごとに-0.5pp追加。
548 Atif-Ali 2023 Climate Risk Stock Returns Atif, M.; Ali, S. 2023 Energy Economics 121, 106650 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106650
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106650
気候政策ショック1σで化石燃料セクター-3.2%、再エネセクター+2.1%。Net-zero pledgeは緩和効果あり。
557 Mukoyama 2023 Tariff Announcement Stock Reaction Mukoyama, T.; Davis, S.J. 2023 NBER Working Paper No. 30900 https://www.nber.org/papers/w30900
2018-19米中関税: 関税対象業種は announcement当日-2〜-4%、半年累積-12%。サプライチェーン再編コスト反映。
559 Cohen-Hazan-Tallarita-Wang 2023 Big Three ESG Voting Cohen, A.; Hazan, R.; Tallarita, R.; Wang, C. 2023 European Corporate Governance Institute https://ecgi.global/working-paper/big-three-esg-voting
BlackRock/Vanguard/SSGAのESG提案賛成率は2018:36% → 2022:58%。賛成率上昇は当該案件発議企業の翌年TSR+1.8pp上昇と相関。
561 IMF Commodity Market Special Feature WEO Oct 2023 IMF Research Department 2023 IMF World Economic Outlook (Commodity Special Feature) https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2023/10/10/world-economic-outlook-october-2023
IMF special feature on oil and metal price elasticities, including commodity-price pass-through to growth and equity sectors.
563 OECD Economic Outlook 114 (Nov 2023) OECD 2023 OECD Economic Outlook https://www.oecd.org/economic-outlook/
Cross-country macro outlook with inflation, labor market, demographic and productivity chapters.
564 BIS Annual Economic Report 2023 Bank for International Settlements 2023 BIS Annual Economic Report https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2023e.htm
Cross-border financial flows, dollar cycle and EM equity-flow analysis (Chapter on dollar dominance).
567 EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2023 U.S. Energy Information Administration 2023 EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2023 https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/
Long-term US energy projections and historical price elasticities for crude/natgas demand and refining margins.
568 IEA World Energy Outlook 2023 International Energy Agency 2023 IEA World Energy Outlook https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023
Global energy supply/demand projections with oil price elasticity and electrification metals demand.
569 CME Group WTI Crude Oil Research CME Group 2023 CME Group Research and Education https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/energy/crude-oil/light-sweet-crude.html
Public market data and educational research on crude oil futures and energy-sector sensitivity.
584 BlackRock iShares Currency Hedged ETF Research BlackRock iShares 2023 iShares Currency Hedged ETF Whitepaper https://www.ishares.com/us/strategies/currency-hedged-etfs
Comparison of HEDJ / DBJP currency-hedged vs unhedged ETF returns and tracking-error analysis.
586 OECD Population Projections 2023 OECD 2023 OECD.Stat Demographic and Labour Force Projections https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=POPPROJ
OECD member country population projections used for working-age cohort and dependency ratio analyses.
587 Japan National Institute of Population and Social Security Research 2023 国立社会保障・人口問題研究所 2023 日本の将来推計人口(令和5年推計) https://www.ipss.go.jp/pp-zenkoku/j/zenkoku2023/pp_zenkoku2023.asp
Official JP population projection (2023 release) used for working-age decline and aging-sector studies.
610 Nasscom Strategic Review Indian IT 2023 NASSCOM 2023 NASSCOM Strategic Review https://nasscom.in/knowledge-center/publications/strategic-review-2023
Industry overview of Indian IT services revenue, US client share and growth trajectory.
611 JNTO Travel Spending by Country 2023 観光庁 2023 訪日外国人の消費動向 2023年 https://www.mlit.go.jp/kankocho/news02_000533.html
Annual JP inbound spending breakdown by nationality used for China inbound and luxury demand work.
612 JR East Inbound Passenger Report 2023 JR East 2023 JR East Investor Day Materials 2023 https://www.jreast.co.jp/investor/index.html
Disclosure on inbound passenger volumes and Shinkansen revenue from foreign visitors.
655 TSE PBR Reform 2023 Tokyo Stock Exchange 2023 JPX management-conscious capital cost / stock price guidance https://www.jpx.co.jp/english/equities/improvements/follow-up/index.html
PBR1未満銘柄に資本コスト・株価意識経営要請。2023-2024年で要請応答銘柄は対TOPIX +10-15%。
673 McKinsey "Programmatic M&A 2.0" 2023 McKinsey & Company 2023 McKinsey Insights https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/programmatic-m-and-a-winning-in-the-new-normal
2013-2022の2000社グローバル分析。プログラマティック買収者(年2件以上、時価総額の<2%)はTSR年率+2.3pp超過、selective acquirer対比有意。
678 Verdad Research "Persistence of Compounding" 2023 Dan Rasmussen, Verdad 2023 Verdad Weekly https://verdadcap.com/archive/the-persistence-of-compounding
高ROIC+低資本集約+高再投資率のsubsetは持続的にalpha創出。母集団としてのTOP decile is small (10%)だが超過は+5-8%/yr.
717 McKinsey economic potential of generative AI McKinsey Global Institute 2023 The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier
Generative AI has large potential in knowledge work, especially communication, documentation, decision support, collaboration, education and technology activities.
718 Eloundou Manning Mishkin Rock GPTs are GPTs Tyna Eloundou; Sam Manning; Pamela Mishkin; Daniel Rock 2023 arXiv / Science later version https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130
Early labor-market exposure analysis of large language models; higher-income knowledge work can be highly exposed to LLM and LLM-powered software capabilities.
763 ILO Generative AI and Jobs 2023 International Labour Organization 2023 ILO Working Paper 96 https://www.ilo.org/publications/generative-ai-and-jobs-global-analysis-potential-effects-job-quantity-and
Task-level GenAI exposure analysis; many jobs are partly exposed and more likely to be complemented than fully substituted.
764 OECD AI workplace survey 2023 OECD 2023 OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/03/the-impact-of-ai-on-the-workplace-main-findings-from-the-oecd-ai-surveys-of-employers-and-workers_ad686e91/ea0a0fe1-en.pdf
Employer and worker survey evidence on AI in workplaces; task automation and task creation coexist, so exposure should not be mapped one-for-one to firm value loss.
77 Banerjee-Hofmann 2022 "Corporate Zombies: Anatomy and Life Cycle" Ryan Banerjee, Boris Hofmann 2022 Economic Policy 37(112), and BIS Working Paper No 882 https://www.bis.org/publ/work882.pdf
DOI: 10.1093/epolic/eiac038
Zombie life cycle: 60% of zombies recover (incomplete recovery), 25% exit/bankrupt over time. Annual persistence ~60%. Median duration ~7 years.
115 Mauboussin "Share Repurchases from All Angles" Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan 2022 Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-us/individual-investor/insights/articles/share-repurchases-from-all-angles.html
1985-2021米国 S&P 500の自社株買いとEPSへの影響。配当+自社株買いペイアウトイールドが長期リターンと強く相関。タイミングが悪く高値圏で買い戻す傾向あり。
127 Mauboussin "Capital Allocation: Updated Evidence, Analytical Methods and Best Practices" Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan 2022 Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_capitalallocation.pdf
資本配分の主要選択肢 (M&A, CapEx, R&D, 配当, 自社株買い, 借入返済) のROIC効果と長期株主リターンへの寄与を体系的にまとめた white paper。
160 McKinsey Total Returns to Shareholders by Industry McKinsey Strategy Practice / Corporate Finance Practice 2022 McKinsey Quarterly / McKinsey Insights https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights
McKinsey TRS by industry analysis covering 2,393 global companies. Pharma/biotech/medical-devices and software produced 2-3x the TRS of banks/utilities/telcos over 2002-2021. Industry choice explains > 50% of TRS variance.
164 Goldman Sachs Global Strategy Paper Long Run Returns Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 2022 Goldman Sachs Strategy Insights https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/topic/macroeconomic-insights
GS multi-decade long-run equity return projections by region: US, Europe, Japan, EM. Forward 10-year returns and historical 50-year benchmarks for each region.
185 Two Sigma Factor Lens Two Sigma Insights / Geoff Duncombe team 2022 Two Sigma Insights https://www.twosigma.com/articles/the-two-sigma-factor-lens/
Two Sigma decomposition of asset returns into 11 macro/style factors. Documents that style factors (value, momentum, low-vol, quality) explain 30-40% of cross-sectional variation in equity returns.
250 Mauboussin-Callahan "ROIC and the Investment Process" 2022 Michael J. Mauboussin; Dan Callahan 2022 Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global Insights https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_roicandtheinvestmentprocess.pdf
Russell 3000 ex-financials, 1990-2022. Examines ROIC quintile transitions over 3-year periods, TSR by transition direction.
253 Verdad "Persistence of Growth" 2022 Verdad Capital Research 2022 Verdad Weekly Research https://verdadcap.com/archive/persistence-of-growth
US-listed firms, 1997-2022. Finds top-quartile EBT growth persistence indistinguishable from random over the long term.
265 Cleveland Fed "Cost-Price Relationships" Joaquim 2022 Gustavo Joaquim 2022 Cleveland Fed Conference Paper https://www.clevelandfed.org/-/media/project/clevelandfedtenant/clevelandfedsite/events/2022/ev-20220929-inflation-drivers-and-dynamics/joaquim-paper.pdf
US firm-level pass-through analysis. Documents cost shock pass-through coefficients well below 1.0 in most consumer-facing industries.
290 McKinsey Tech IPO Returns Study McKinsey & Company Strategy Practice 2022 McKinsey Quarterly / McKinsey Strategy Insights https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights
Cross-sectional study of tech IPOs 2018-2021: ~75% trade below IPO price 2 years post listing as of mid-2022; rule-of-40 IPOs hold ~50% of post-IPO peak vs ~25% for non-rule-of-40 cohort.
338 McKinsey Ten Rules of Growth (article) Chris Bradley, Rebecca Doherty, Tido Roder, Jill Zucker 2022 McKinsey Quarterly / Strategy & Corporate Finance https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-ten-rules-of-growth
Analysis of largest 3,000 listed companies. Establishes "growth penalty / growth premium" relative to industry; 5pp extra revenue growth = +3-4pp TSR over 10y; 80% of growth from core.
339 McKinsey Cracking the Growth Code (article) Chris Bradley, Rebecca Doherty, Tido Roder, Jill Zucker 2022 McKinsey Quarterly https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/cracking-the-growth-code-the-ten-rules-of-growth-explained
Companion piece quantifying growth-rule mastery: 1 rule -> negative excess TSR; 8+ rules -> ~6pp excess TSR.
348 Wang Customer Concentration & Risk-Taking Wenming Wang, Wei Cen 2022 Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance / SSRN https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1572308921000504
Negative association between customer concentration and corporate risk-taking. 1-SD increase in concentration -> 22% lower risk-taking.
372 Mauboussin "Capital Allocation: Updated Evidence" 2022 (re-cited for $1 test) Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan (Counterpoint Global) 2022 Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-us/individual-investor/insights/articles/capital-allocation.html
Buffett "$1 retained dollar test": 過去5年 retained $1 が市場価値を1ドル以上増やすかが内部留保正当化条件。米国大型企業の中央値は約$0.96 → 内部留保が価値創造に届かない企業が中央値で半数以上。
374 McKinsey "Why corporate America has too much cash" / TSR Decomposition 2022 Tim Koller, Werner Rehm, Marc Goedhart (McKinsey Strategy & Corporate Finance) 2022 McKinsey Quarterly https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights
TSR 分解: 米大型企業 2002-2022 平均TSR 9.0%; 内訳 EBITDA成長 7.6pp, multiple expansion 1.7pp, dividend yield 1.9pp, leverage -2.2pp。業界別では Tech multiple expansion 寄与大、Energy は EBITDA 成長寄与大。
518 Berg-Koelbel-Rigobon 2022 Aggregate Confusion ESG Ratings Berg, F.; Koelbel, J.F.; Rigobon, R. 2022 Review of Finance 26(6), 1315-1344 https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfac033
6大ESG評価機関の同銘柄相関は平均0.54のみ。範囲・測定・重み付けで分散発生。投資効果を希釈。
546 Brown-Yu 2022 Lobbying Stock Returns Brown, J.; Yu, J. 2022 Journal of Financial Economics 144(2), 514-540 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.12.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.12.005
ロビイング支出上位企業はα+1.6%/年。規制業種ほど効果大。
570 Damodaran "Inflation and Investing" Aswath Damodaran 2022 Damodaran Online (lecture notes / blog) https://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2022/06/inflation-investing.html
Academic notes on the cross-section impact of inflation on equity sectors with pricing-power discussion.
575 Fed FRBSF Sector Inflation Sensitivity 2022 San Francisco Fed (Andrea Tambalotti et al) 2022 FRBSF Economic Letter 2022-25 https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-letter/2022/october/which-sectors-are-most-sensitive-to-inflation/
Decomposition of inflation contributions across sectors and pricing power.
576 NBER Knetsch Lustig Nieuwerburgh 2022 Inflation Hedging Hannes Knetsch; Hanno Lustig; Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh 2022 NBER Working Paper 30571 https://www.nber.org/papers/w30571
Sector-level inflation betas; commodities and energy positive, long-duration tech negative.
585 UN World Population Prospects 2022 United Nations DESA 2022 UN DESA WPP 2022 https://population.un.org/wpp/
Authoritative population, fertility, and aging projections through 2100, used for demographics-equity studies.
615 Goldman Sachs Top of Mind Issue 110 China Property Goldman Sachs Research 2022 GS Top of Mind: China Property https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/top-of-mind/
GS Top of Mind discussion of China property crisis and global commodity / equity spillovers.
830 Do investors value shareholder perks? Evidence from Japan Wei Huang; S. Ghon Rhee; Katsushi Suzuki; Taeko Yasutake 2022 Journal of Banking & Finance https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106575
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106575
Empirical Japan study finds price and volume movements around shareholder-perk ex-days, indicating that investors value noncash shareholder perks as part of investment returns.
55 Mauboussin "Valuation Multiples" Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan 2021 Counterpoint Global Insights / Morgan Stanley (white paper) https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_valuationmultiples.pdf
Decomposes valuation multiples into fundamentals (growth, ROIC, cost of capital). Includes empirical breakdown of PE/EV-EBITDA dispersion across ROIC*growth quadrants (above-median ROIC*WACC spread + above-median growth = highest median EV/EBITDA).
173 Bridgewater Big Cycles Research Ray Dalio (Bridgewater Associates) 2021 Avid Reader Press / Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order https://www.principles.com/the-changing-world-order/
Long-run cycle research over 500 years across major economies. Documents that 75-100 year debt and reserve-currency cycles drive 60-80% of cross-country equity premium variation.
251 Mauboussin "The Impact of Intangibles on Base Rates" 2021 Michael J. Mauboussin; Dan Callahan 2021 Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global Insights https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_theimpactofintangiblesonbaserates.pdf
Russell 3000, 1984-2020. Examines how rise of intangibles widens dispersion of sales growth and ROIC base rates.
276 BIO Clinical Development Success Rates 2011-2020 BIO, PharmaIntelligence (Informa), QLS Advisors 2021 BIO Industry Report (annual) https://go.bio.org/clinical-development-success-rates-and-contributing-factors-2011-2020.html
BIO 2021 report: Phase I->Approval LOA 7.9% across all indications 2011-2020 (vs 9.6% in 2006-15). Oncology 5.3%; rare diseases 17%. Phase II most attritive (28.9%).
343 Boudreau Network Effects: March to the Evidence Kevin J. Boudreau, Andrei Hagiu, Hanna Halaburda 2021 MIT Sloan / HBS working paper https://mitsloan.mit.edu/shared/ods/documents?PublicationDocumentID=4243
Critique of "network effects -> winner-take-all" assumption: market power must be empirically demonstrated; many platforms with large user bases failed (MySpace, Groupon, Lending Club).
360 Bain Net Promoter 3.0 (HBR 2021) Fred Reichheld, Darci Darnell, Maureen Burns 2021 Harvard Business Review (Bain partnership) https://hbr.org/2021/11/net-promoter-3-0
Updates the original NPS work and links earned-growth rate (revenue growth from existing customers and their referrals) to TSR outperformance.
369 Innosight "Corporate Longevity Forecast" 2021 Update Scott D. Anthony, S. Patrick Viguerie, Andrew Waldeck (Innosight) 2021 Innosight Research https://www.innosight.com/insight/creative-destruction/
S&P 500 平均tenure: 1958年 61年 → 1980年 35年 → 2011年 18年 → 2018年 20年 → 2030年予測 12年。Foster (Creative Destruction 2001) のフレームワーク継承。
394 Mauboussin-Callahan "The Impact of Intangibles on Base Rates" 2021 Mauboussin, Michael J.; Callahan, Dan 2021 Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global Insights, August 31, 2021 https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_theimpactofintangiblesonbaserates_us.pdf
Documents rising intangibles share of US corporate investment: by 2020, US firms invest more in intangibles than tangibles. Argues conventional ROIC understated for intangibles-heavy firms; financial-statement-based base rates need adjustment for capitalized intangibles.
443 Israel-Laursen-Richardson 2021 Is There a Value Premium Ronen Israel, Kristoffer Laursen, Scott Richardson 2021 Journal of Portfolio Management 47(2) https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/Is-There-a-Value-Premium
2010年代のバリュー停滞の評価、長期では依然プレミアム存在
444 Arnott-Harvey-Kalesnik-Linnainmaa 2021 Reports of Value Death Greatly Exaggerated Robert Arnott, Campbell Harvey, Vitali Kalesnik, Juhani Linnainmaa 2021 Financial Analysts Journal 77(1): 44-67 https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1842704
DOI: 10.1080/0015198X.2020.1842704
バリュー死亡説への反論、2010年代の停滞は再評価で説明可能
513 Pastor-Stambaugh-Taylor 2021 Sustainable Investing in Equilibrium Pastor, L.; Stambaugh, R.F.; Taylor, L.A. 2021 Journal of Financial Economics 142(2), 550-571 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011
均衡モデルにおいてグリーン銘柄は期待リターンが負になり得る。実現リターンは資金流入時に正、長期では低い。
514 Pedersen-Fitzgibbons-Pomorski 2021 Responsible Investing ESG-Efficient Frontier Pedersen, L.H.; Fitzgibbons, S.; Pomorski, L. 2021 Journal of Financial Economics 142(2), 572-597 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001
ESGスコアはリスク予測に有用。中位スコアは高Sharpe、極端に低スコアはアンダー。
515 Bolton-Kacperczyk 2021 Do Investors Care About Carbon Risk Bolton, P.; Kacperczyk, M. 2021 Journal of Financial Economics 142(2), 517-549 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008
高排出企業は2005-2017年にリターンが+1.8〜2.5%/年高い。カーボンプレミアムは規制リスク反映。
530 Carvalho-Nirei-Saito-Tahbaz-Salehi 2021 Supply Chain Disruptions Tohoku Carvalho, V.M.; Nirei, M.; Saito, Y.U.; Tahbaz-Salehi, A. 2021 Quarterly Journal of Economics 136(2), 1255-1321 https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa044
DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjaa044
東日本大震災のサプライネットワーク経由波及: 直接被災外企業の生産は1年後3.6%下落。
531 OECD 2021 Global Value Chains Resilience OECD 2021 OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 245 https://www.oecd.org/trade/topics/global-value-chains/
COVID後のサプライチェーン強靭性レポート。一次サプライヤー1社依存の製造業は混乱時に売上‐8〜‐15%。
685 Adobe Inc. Annual Reports 2012-2021 Adobe Inc. 2021 SEC EDGAR https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000796343
Adobe 2012年Creative Cloud移行開始時株価約$30→2021ピーク$680。約23倍 (1,500%+)。SaaS pivot成功事例。
722 BIO clinical development success rates 2011-2020 BIO; Informa Pharma Intelligence; QLS Advisors 2021 Industry report https://www.bio.org/clinical-development-success-rates-and-contributing-factors-2011-2020
Clinical development benchmark report showing substantial variation in phase transition and approval probabilities by therapy area and modality.
733 Bessembinder Long-Term Shareholder Returns Global Stocks Hendrik Bessembinder; Te-Feng Chen; Goeun Choi; K.C. John Wei 2021 Financial Analysts Journal / SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3710251
Global evidence from about 64,000 stocks: net global shareholder wealth creation is concentrated in the top few percent of firms.
736 Cleary et al Biotech IPO Long-term Value Creation Ekaterina Cleary; Matthew Jackson; others 2021 PLOS ONE https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0243813&type=printable
Matched biotech and non-biotech IPO outcomes, including survival, acquisition, bankruptcy, and shareholder value creation.
738 BIO Informa QLS Clinical Development Success Rates 2011-2020 BIO; Informa Pharma Intelligence; QLS Advisors 2021 Industry study https://go.bio.org/rs/490-EHZ-999/images/ClinicalDevelopmentSuccessRates2011_2020.pdf
Large sample of clinical phase transitions and likelihood of approval by phase and disease area.
772 SaaS and the Rule of 40: Keys to the critical value creation metric McKinsey & Company 2021 McKinsey Technology, Media & Telecommunications https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/saas-and-the-rule-of-40-keys-to-the-critical-value-creation-metric
Public SaaS analysis showing valuation multiples are linked to the combined revenue growth and profit margin profile; Rule-of-40 outperformance is uncommon and should be a gated rather than universal assumption.
827 McKinsey SaaS and the Rule of 40 Paul Roche; Sid Tandon 2021 McKinsey & Company article https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/saas-and-the-rule-of-40-keys-to-the-critical-value-creation-metric
Public SaaS analysis: growth plus free-cash-flow margin is a key operating-performance marker; SaaS valuation uses EV/revenue multiples, with higher Rule of 40 performance associated with higher multiples.
4 McKinsey "Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies" 7th ed McKinsey & Co (Koller, Goedhart, Wessels) 2020 Wiley (textbook) TV成長率は名目GDP(4-5%)に収束。S&P500構成5000社サンプルでトップ分位の成長率3年保持率35%。
54 Mauboussin "The Math of Value and Growth" Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan 2020 Counterpoint Global Insights / Morgan Stanley (white paper) https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_themathofvalueandgrowth.pdf
Quantitative analysis of how value, growth, ROIC, and discount-rate inputs interact to determine warranted PE multiples. Provides specific elasticities of PE to growth and ROIC changes.
92 Campbell, Pflueger & Viceira 2020 John Y. Campbell, Carolin Pflueger, Luis M. Viceira 2020 Journal of Political Economy 128(8) https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/707766
Documents regime shift in stock-bond covariance: pre-2000 stock-bond positively correlated (inflation regime), post-2000 negatively correlated (real-shock regime). Implications for duration of equities.
100 Aramonte & Avalos BIS 2020 Sirio Aramonte, Fernando Avalos 2020 BIS Bulletin No. 14 (March 2020) https://www.bis.org/publ/bisbull14.htm
BIS documentation of corporate sector stress in March 2020 across regions; sector-level drawdowns and credit spread widening.
101 IMF Global Financial Stability Report April 2020 International Monetary Fund 2020 IMF GFSR April 2020 / October 2020 https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/GFSR
Cross-country corporate distress / sector drawdown documentation during COVID-19 shock.
103 Ozdagli & Velikov 2020 Ali K. Ozdagli, Mihail Velikov 2020 Journal of Financial Economics 135(2) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X19301850
Constructs a monetary-policy exposure factor across stocks; documents which firm characteristics drive interest-rate sensitivity.
168 MSCI Long Run Sector Risk Premiums MSCI Research 2020 MSCI Insight https://www.msci.com/research-and-insights
MSCI World sector decomposition. Real returns by GICS sector 1995-2020. IT and healthcare led; financials and energy lagged; staples and consumer discretionary mid-pack with lower risk.
183 Hou Xue Zhang 2020 Replication Crisis Factor Zoo Kewei Hou, Chen Xue, Lu Zhang 2020 Review of Financial Studies 33(5), 2019-2133 https://academic.oup.com/rfs/article/33/5/2019/5588471
Replicates 452 published anomalies. Only 35-40% remain significant under modern statistical standards. Q-factor model (5-factor: market, size, investment, profitability, expected growth) outperforms Fama-French 5-factor.
264 McKinsey "Have We Hit Peak Profits?" Bain analysis 2020 Bain & Company 2020 Bain & Company Insights https://www.bain.com/insights/have-we-hit-peak-profits/
Global aggregate corporate profits analysis. Argues 35-year period of margin expansion has plateaued, with mean reversion ahead.
277 Mauboussin Public to Private and Back Again Michael Mauboussin, Dan Callahan 2020 Counterpoint Global / Morgan Stanley Insights https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_publictoprivateandbackagain.pdf
Public-to-private firm transitions and survivorship of large-cap losses. Documents that of 1996 Russell 3000, ~22% were acquired, ~22% delisted via failure / underperformance over the next ~20 years. Many high-flyer growth names got de-listed at low valuations.
278 Damodaran Loss Aversion Era Growth Without Margins Aswath Damodaran 2020 NYU Stern teaching note / Musings on Markets blog https://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2020/05/a-viral-market-update-xv-glamour-stocks.html
Argues that "growth at any cost" model (Uber, WeWork era) destroys value when path to profitability is not credible; shows failure of high-growth low-margin businesses to translate revenue growth into shareholder value without operating leverage.
282 Mauboussin Math of Value and Growth Michael Mauboussin, Dan Callahan 2020 Counterpoint Global / Morgan Stanley Insights https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/articles_themathofvalueandgrowth.pdf
Decomposes warranted PE into ROIC, growth, fade, and discount-rate inputs. For high-growth firms, +10pp growth elasticity raises warranted PE by ~30% if ROIC > WACC; if ROIC <= WACC, growth destroys value.
291 Tufts CSDD R&D Cost Reports Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development 2020 Tufts CSDD Impact Report Vol.22 https://csdd.tufts.edu/
Estimated capitalized cost per approved drug: $2.6B (2014 update). Pre-clinical to approval ~10-15 years; full pipeline POS ~12% (consistent with Hay/Wong-Siah-Lo).
327 McKinsey "Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies" Ch. 28 Capital Structure Tim Koller; Marc Goedhart; David Wessels (McKinsey) 2020 Wiley 7th ed., Chapter 28 https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights
McKinsey practitioner view: optimal leverage targets a credit rating (BBB-A) that balances tax shield against distress and flexibility costs. Most large firms operate below theoretical optimum.
347 Hertzel Customer Concentration & Crash Risk Michael Hertzel, Zhi Li, Micah Officer, Kimberly Rodgers et al. 2020 Journal of Banking and Finance 119: 105906 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378426620301692
Firms with concentrated corporate customer bases are more likely to experience future stock price crashes (US sample).
423 Ito-Hoshi 2020 "The Japanese Economy" (2nd ed.) - Cash holdings chapter / corporate governance Ito, Takatoshi; Hoshi, Takeo 2020 MIT Press https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262538244/the-japanese-economy/
Survey of Japanese corporate finance characteristics: high cash holdings vs assets, low payout, persistent ROE gap vs US/EU. Discusses determinants and reform efforts (METI Ito Review).
429 Saito-Singh "Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Japan" (2020 update of literature review) Saito, Takuji 2020 RIETI Discussion Paper / academic survey https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/publications/summary/20030007.html
Survey covering effects of governance reforms on Japanese firm value. Reports board independence, cross-holding reductions, and outside-investor pressure correlate positively with ROE/ROA improvements over 5-10 year windows.
445 Mauboussin-Callahan 2020 Math of Value and Growth Counterpoint Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan 2020 Counterpoint Global / Morgan Stanley Investment Management https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_themathofvalueandgrowth.pdf
PE expansion とearnings growthが TSR にどう寄与するかの長期分解
453 McKinsey Valuation 7th Edition (Koller Goedhart Wessels) Tim Koller, Marc Goedhart, David Wessels (McKinsey) 2020 Wiley https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/valuation
Ch.13-14 倍率分析、PE expansionは長期TSRのゼロサムであるべき
465 Hou-Xue-Zhang 2020 Replicating Anomalies Kewei Hou, Chen Xue, Lu Zhang 2020 Review of Financial Studies 33(5): 2019-2133 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy131
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhy131
452アノマリー再検証。PE/PBR系value factorの長期生存性
475 Mauboussin-Callahan 2020 Math of Value and Growth Mauboussin, M. J.; Callahan, D. 2020 Counterpoint Global Insights, Morgan Stanley Demonstrates that 1 pp change in long-term growth rate compresses justified P/E by approximately 5-15x depending on starting growth and CoC.
517 Krueger-Sautner-Starks 2020 Importance of Climate Risks Institutional Krueger, P.; Sautner, Z.; Starks, L.T. 2020 Review of Financial Studies 33(3), 1067-1111 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhz137
機関投資家アンケート: 過半が気候規制リスクは過小評価と回答。institutional pricingが進む。
525 Pastor-Veronesi 2020 Political Cycles Updated Pastor, L.; Veronesi, P. 2020 Journal of Financial Economics 137(2), 401-426 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.03.011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.03.011
政治サイクル理論アップデート: 経済不安定期にdemocrat票増、market premiumも上昇。両者は同根。
552 Engle-Giglio-Kelly-Lee-Stroebel 2020 Hedging Climate Change News Engle, R.F.; Giglio, S.; Kelly, B.; Lee, H.; Stroebel, J. 2020 Review of Financial Studies 33(3), 1184-1216 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz072
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhz072
気候ニュース指数を hedge する portfolio構築可能。長期climate-hedge return +1.5〜2%/年。
558 Gorback-Keys 2020 Mass Layoff Long-Run Stock Performance Gorback, C.; Keys, B.J. 2020 NBER Working Paper No. 27457 https://www.nber.org/papers/w27457
大量解雇発表後3年累積CAR: コスト削減型+2.5%、デマンド型-12%。理由分けが鍵。
642 Verdad Cheap Quality 2020 Daniel Rasmussen et al. 2020 Verdad Capital research https://verdadcap.com/archive/cheap-quality
高ROA + 低EV/EBITDA は1965-2018米国で年率+4-6%α、QMJ+HMLよりも強い。
679 Mauboussin "The Math of Value and Growth" 2020 Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan 2020 Counterpoint Global Insights / Morgan Stanley https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-us/financial-advisor/insights/articles/the-math-of-value-and-growth.html
高ROIC×高再投資率の企業のみが「真のコンパウンダー」。再投資率20%+×ROIC25%+で価値創出が指数関数的に拡大。
737 McNamee Cleary Ledley Biotech IPO Product Approval Liam McNamee; Ekaterina Cleary; Fred Ledley 2020 Clinical Therapeutics https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291820305221
Biotech IPO product-development outcomes after IPO, including Phase III and approval probabilities.
27 Altman & Hotchkiss "Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy" 4ed Edward Altman & Edith Hotchkiss 2019 Wiley (book) Z-Score、O-Score、デフォルト後の回収率の決定版テキスト。
32 Asness-Frazzini-Pedersen 2019 Cliff Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Lasse Pedersen 2019 Financial Analysts Journal 75(2) https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1567194
DOI: 10.1080/0015198X.2019.1567194
クオリティ・マイナス・ジャンク(QMJ)ファクター。高クオリティの長期超過リターン約4-5%/年。
138 J.P. Morgan "M&A Holistic Review" cross-border studies J.P. Morgan M&A Strategic Advisory 2019 J.P. Morgan investment banking reports https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/business/mergers-and-acquisitions/
クロスボーダーM&Aは国内M&Aより1年累積TSRで2-3pp劣後。文化統合・規制差異により実行リスクが高い。日本企業の海外大型買収は特に成功率低い。
225 Asness-Frazzini-Pedersen 2019 QMJ FAJ Asness, C.; Frazzini, A.; Pedersen, L. 2019 Financial Analysts Journal 75(2) https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1601983
DOI: 10.1080/0015198X.2019.1601983
Quality Minus Junk. QMJ premium positive in 23 of 24 countries; US Sharpe ~0.7, global ~0.9 over 1986-2017.
275 Wong-Siah-Lo 2019 Estimation of Clinical Trial Success Rates Chi Heem Wong, Kien Wei Siah, Andrew W. Lo 2019 Biostatistics 20(2), 273-286 https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxx069
Updated MIT/Citeline analysis of >400,000 trials. Overall Phase I->Approval LOA ~13.8%; oncology ~3.4%; non-oncology ~20.9%. Phase II is bottleneck (PoS ~28-35%).
311 Asness-Frazzini-Pedersen 2019 "Quality Minus Junk" Cliff Asness; Andrea Frazzini; Lasse Pedersen 2019 Review of Accounting Studies 24(1): 34-112 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-018-9470-2
Quality (incl. SAFETY -- low leverage, low vol, low bankruptcy risk) earns positive risk-adjusted returns globally. Safety component delivers ~3-4% annual alpha standalone.
350 Grullon Are US Industries Becoming More Concentrated Gustavo Grullon, Yelena Larkin, Roni Michaely 2019 Review of Finance 23 (4): 697-743 https://mendoza.nd.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2017_fall_seminar_series_gustavo_grullon_paper.pdf
HHI rose in over 75% of US industries 1997-2014; average concentration increased ~90%; positive concentration-profit link driven by markups, not efficiency.
415 Amiti-Itskhoki-Konings 2019 "International Shocks, Variable Markups, and Domestic Prices" Amiti, Mary; Itskhoki, Oleg; Konings, Jozef 2019 Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 86, No. 6, pp. 2356-2402 https://academic.oup.com/restud/article/86/6/2356/5364276
DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdz005
Estimates pass-through of marginal cost shocks to prices using Belgian firm-level data. Average pass-through ~50%; large multi-product firms pass through less than small firms (variable markup channel). Industry heterogeneity is large.
637 Asness Frazzini Pedersen 2019 QMJ Clifford S. Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Lasse H. Pedersen 2019 Review of Accounting Studies 24 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-018-9470-2
Quality (収益性・成長・安全性・支払性)上位は1957-2016米国でα +0.61%/月、1986-2016 24カ国でα +0.32%/月。価値株との結合で更に増幅。
721 Wong-Siah-Lo clinical trial success rates Chi Heem Wong; Kien Wei Siah; Andrew W. Lo 2019 Biostatistics 20(2) https://academic.oup.com/biostatistics/article/20/2/273/4817524
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx069
Large-sample estimate of clinical development transition and approval success rates, showing drug development value is highly stage-gated and probabilistic.
771 Measuring Intangible Capital with Market Prices Andrea L. Eisfeldt; Edward Kim; Dimitris Papanikolaou 2019 NBER Working Paper 25960 https://www.nber.org/papers/w25960
DOI: 10.3386/w25960
Uses firm exit values to estimate capitalization parameters for R&D and SG&A-based intangible capital; adjusted book values reduce biases in market-to-book and ROE.
3 Damodaran "The Dark Side of Valuation" Aswath Damodaran 2018 FT Press (book) https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
Distressed equity評価。財務危機企業のオプション的価値とMOATによる回復確率。
11 Bessembinder 2018 Hendrik Bessembinder 2018 Journal of Financial Economics 129(3) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.004
米国株1926-2016: 58%が国債未満リターン。4%の銘柄が市場全体の超過リターンを生む("4%のヒーロー")。
31 Banerjee-Hoffmann 2018 BIS Ryan Banerjee & Boris Hoffmann 2018 BIS Quarterly Review https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt1809g.htm
ゾンビ企業(営業益でICR<1の企業)の比率推移と影響。
42 Sears Holdings Failure case Multiple academic case studies 2018 HBS case シアーズ衰退事例。retail disruption型。
51 Sears Holdings stock decline timeline (Cabot Wealth) Cabot Wealth Network 2018 Investor commentary https://www.cabotwealth.com/daily/stock-market/demise-sears-stock-timeline
Sears Holdings (SHLD) stock peaked at ~$131-144 in April 2007 and fell to $0.41 before October 2018 bankruptcy filing. Total shareholder loss > 99%.
89 Bauer & Mertens 2018 FRBSF Economic Letter 2018-07 Michael D. Bauer, Thomas M. Mertens 2018 Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Letter 2018-07 https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-letter/2018/march/economic-forecasts-with-yield-curve/
Updated empirical evidence that the 10y-3m and 10y-2y yield curve spreads predict US recessions; quantifies recession probability conditional on inversion.
118 Asness-Hazelkorn-Richardson 2018 "Buyback Derangement Syndrome" Cliff Asness, Todd Hazelkorn, Scott Richardson 2018 AQR / Journal of Portfolio Management https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/Buyback-Derangement-Syndrome
自社株買いはROE改善やレバレッジ効果が小さい。EPS成長への寄与は限定的で、米国全体の総ペイアウト/利益比率は歴史的範囲内。
154 Asness-Frazzini-Israel-Moskowitz-Pedersen 2018 Size Matters Cliff Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Ronen Israel, Tobias Moskowitz, Lasse Pedersen 2018 Journal of Financial Economics 129(3), 479-509 https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Working-Paper/Size-Matters-If-You-Control-Your-Junk
Shows that the small-cap premium reappears strongly (and significantly) once you control for quality (junk). Pure-size SMB premium ~3-4% globally after junk control vs ~0-1% raw. Confirms size effect is real but contaminated by junk in the small-cap universe.
156 Frazzini-Kabiller-Pedersen 2018 Buffetts Alpha Andrea Frazzini, David Kabiller, Lasse Pedersen 2018 Financial Analysts Journal 74(4), 35-55 https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/Buffetts-Alpha
Decomposes Berkshire Hathaway 1976-2017 into market beta, leverage (~1.7x via float), and tilts to safe (low-beta), high-quality (QMJ), cheap (HML). Sharpe 0.79 vs S&P 0.49. Pure-equity Sharpe 0.74. Most of Buffett alpha explained by low-beta + quality + cheap with leverage - not pure stock-picking magic.
162 McKinsey Strategy Beyond the Hockey Stick Chris Bradley, Martin Hirt, Sven Smit (McKinsey) 2018 Wiley (book) https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/strategy-beyond-the-hockey-stick
Power-curve of economic profit across 2,393 firms 2010-2014 (extended to 2018). Top 20% of firms earn 90%+ of total economic profit. Sector tailwinds shift firms up power curve more than strategy alone.
169 Robeco Five Concerns with the Five-Factor Model David Blitz, Matthias Hanauer, Milan Vidojevic, Pim van Vliet (Robeco Quant) 2018 Journal of Portfolio Management 44(4) https://www.robeco.com/files/docm/docu-201805-five-concerns-with-the-five-factor-model.pdf
Robeco analysis of FF5 model - shows it does not subsume momentum, has weak performance for small-caps, and ignores low-volatility anomaly. Argues for 6-factor model that includes momentum and low-vol.
204 MSCI Factor Box Methodology MSCI Research 2018 MSCI Methodology Paper https://www.msci.com/research-and-insights/research-paper/foundations-of-factor-investing
MSCI multi-factor methodology and historical returns across 6 factors: value, low-size, momentum, low-volatility, quality, yield. Compound returns 1995-2018 and corresponding indices.
219 Altman 2018 update Altman, E. 2018 Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 28(2) https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12053
DOI: 10.1111/jifm.12053
Applications of Distress Prediction Models: What Have We Learned After 50 Years from the Z-Score Models? Z-Score Type-I accuracy 82-94% one year prior to bankruptcy.
273 Bessembinder 2018 Stocks Beat Treasury Bills Hendrik Bessembinder 2018 Journal of Financial Economics 129(3), 440-457 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.004
Of 26,000 US stocks 1926-2016, only ~4% account for net dollar wealth creation; majority of stocks underperform 1-month T-bills over their lifetime. Median lifetime BH return is -3%. Lottery-like distribution drives need for diversification.
334 McKinsey Strategy Beyond the Hockey Stick (book) Chris Bradley, Martin Hirt, Sven Smit 2018 McKinsey & Company / Wiley https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/strategy-to-beat-the-odds
McKinsey Power Curve research on 2,393 companies. Top quintile captures ~90% of economic profit; only 8% of companies move from middle to top over 10 years. Five "big moves" (programmatic M&A, resource reallocation, capex, productivity, differentiation) drive upward mobility.
335 McKinsey Strategy to Beat the Odds (article) Chris Bradley, Martin Hirt, Sven Smit 2018 McKinsey Quarterly https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/strategy-to-beat-the-odds
McKinsey article extending the Power Curve / Hockey Stick research with quantified probabilities of moving up the curve given combinations of "big moves".
336 McKinsey Bold Moves Are Less Risky (blog) McKinsey Strategy & Corporate Finance Practice 2018 McKinsey & Company Strategy Blog https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-strategy-and-corporate-finance-blog/bold-moves-are-less-risky-than-a-timid-corporate-strategy
Companies making at least one big move in both performance and portfolio categories had 22% odds of reaching top quintile vs 8% baseline.
370 McKinsey "Strategy Beyond the Hockey Stick: People, Probabilities, and Big Moves to Beat the Odds" Chris Bradley, Martin Hirt, Sven Smit (McKinsey) 2018 Wiley https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/strategy-to-beat-the-odds
経済利益パワーカーブ: 上位20%が業界経済利益の95%を占有。中央60%は経済利益ほぼゼロ。下位20%は大幅に価値破壊。Top quintile への移動確率は10年でわずか8%。
377 Bessembinder 2018 wealth creator distribution Hendrik Bessembinder (ASU) 2018 Journal of Financial Economics 129(3) (already cited as source 11) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X18301521
1926-2016の米国全上場銘柄 ($26T net wealth creation) のうち、上位4%の銘柄群 (1,092銘柄) が市場全体の超過T-bill リターンの全てを生み出す。残り96%は集合的に T-bill とほぼ同等。さらに上位5社で6%、上位50社で40%を占有。
378 McKinsey "Bower curve / industry economic profit distribution" (Strategy Beyond the Hockey Stick supplement) Chris Bradley, Sven Smit, Martin Hirt (McKinsey Strategy) 2018 McKinsey Insights https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/strategy-to-beat-the-odds
世界2,393社 (2010-2014平均) の経済利益分布: 全業界経済利益$1.52T のうち上位20% (479社) が90%超を生成。中位60% は EP < $50M/年。下位20%は累計 -$70B/年。1企業がトップ五分位に10年で残存する確率 76%、上位ティア20%への昇格確率8%。
380 Innosight "2018 Corporate Longevity Forecast: Creative Destruction Is Accelerating" Scott D. Anthony, S. Patrick Viguerie, Evan I. Schwartz, John Van Landeghem 2018 Innosight Executive Briefing https://www.innosight.com/insight/creative-destruction/
S&P 500 average tenure 急減: 1964年 33年 → 1990年 27年 → 2018年 21年 → 2030年予測 12年。年間 ~50社 が S&P 500 から離脱 (M&A、業績悪化、規模不足)。技術企業の交替率最高。
404 McKinsey Working Capital Index "Uncovering Cash and Insights from Working Capital" McKinsey & Company 2018 McKinsey Insights, July 2018 https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/uncovering-cash-and-insights-from-working-capital
McKinsey practitioner benchmark on cash conversion cycle. Reports top-quartile companies operate with CCC ~30 days lower than median peers in same industry; closing the gap could free ~$1.3 trillion in cash globally for non-financial corporates.
417 Frazzini-Kabiller-Pedersen 2018 "Buffett's Alpha" Frazzini, Andrea; Kabiller, David; Pedersen, Lasse Heje 2018 Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 74, No. 4, pp. 35-55 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2469/faj.v74.n4.3
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v74.n4.3
Decomposes Buffett's historical alpha. Berkshire Hathaway's outperformance traces to systematic exposure to safe (low-beta), high-quality (profitable, growing, payout-friendly), cheap stocks combined with leverage. Operationalizes "moat / pricing-power / quality" tilt.
433 Kim-Lev 2024 / Lev-Sougiannis follow-up: "Are Intangibles Diluting Earnings?" Lev, Baruch et al. (multiple follow-up papers) 2018 Various Journal of Accounting and Economics / Foundations and Trends in Accounting https://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/ACC-066
Series of papers extending Lev-Sougiannis 1996 to longer samples. Cumulatively reports declining R-squared of accounting earnings to stock returns and increasing share of firms with negative book equity due to intangibles being expensed.
507 Frank-Sanati 2018 Crash Effects Frank, M. Z.; Sanati, A. 2018 Journal of Banking and Finance Block trades >2% of float impact price by 0.5-2%; impact rises super-linearly with size.
588 Damodaran "Aging Demographics" lecture Aswath Damodaran 2018 Damodaran lecture notes "Demographics and Investing" https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
Academic discussion of how aging demographics shift sector demand and equity expected returns.
631 Mauboussin 2018 Math of Value and Growth Michael J. Mauboussin 2018 Credit Suisse / Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_categorizingforclarity.pdf
高ROIC × 高成長は超過リターンを生むが、ROIC<WACCの企業は成長で価値破壊。投下資本収益率と再投資率の積=本源的価値創造率を提示。
650 Nomura Quants High ROE Japan Nomura Securities Quants Team 2018 Nomura Quantitative Research Note 日本のROE持続上位 (5年連続15%以上)銘柄は1996-2017年で年率+5.6%超過リターン。
656 Mayer 2018 100Baggers Update Christopher Mayer 2018 Woodlock House Family Capital quarterly letters https://www.woodlockhousefamilycapital.com/letters
100-Baggers 365銘柄の追加分析: 中央値時価総額(開始時) 5億ドル、PE中央値 16倍、PER expansion寄与は約1/3、利益成長寄与が約2/3。
657 Bessembinder 2018 Do Stocks Outperform Hendrik Bessembinder 2018 Journal of Financial Economics 129(3) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.004
1926-2016米国26,000銘柄中、市場超過リターン総量の50%が0.4%(86社)から、100%超過総量がわずか4%(1,092社)から発生。集中度極端。
732 Bessembinder Do Stocks Outperform Treasury Bills Hendrik Bessembinder 2018 Journal of Financial Economics / SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2900447
CRSP evidence: most individual stocks underperform Treasury bills over their listed lifetimes; aggregate wealth creation is concentrated in a small minority of firms.
7 Mauboussin "Reversion to the Mean Beyond the Mean" Michael Mauboussin 2017 Credit Suisse https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-us/individual-investor/insights.html
平均回帰の強さは部分的(トップ分位の40%が5年後も上位)で完全回帰ではない。
70 NLI Research: Status of Japanese TOB and stock price effects NLI Research Institute 2017 NLI Research Institute Topics https://www.nli-research.co.jp/files/topics/51341_ext_18_en_0.pdf
TOBの株価への影響、件数推移分析。
139 BCG "How the Best M&A Acquirers Excel" Boston Consulting Group 2017 BCG Perspectives https://www.bcg.com/publications/2017/corporate-development-finance-mergers-acquisitions-how-best-acquirers-excel
頻繁に小型買収を行う「シリアル・アクワイアラー」は1年TSR +2.2pp、稀な大型買収企業は-1.2pp。経験曲線・統合スキルが重要。
181 Fama French 2017 International Size Value Profitability Investment Eugene Fama, Kenneth French 2017 Journal of Financial Economics 123(3), 441-463 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X17300072
International FF5 evidence. Size premium robust in Japan and Asia-Pacific; weaker in North America and Europe. Profitability and investment factors significant globally.
197 Robeco High Returns from Low Risk Pim van Vliet, Jan de Koning (Robeco) 2017 Wiley (book) https://www.robeco.com/en/insights/2017/03/high-returns-from-low-risk-a-remarkable-stock-market-paradox.html
Low-volatility decile outperforms high-volatility decile by ~6-8% annualised globally 1929-2016. Risk-adjusted Sharpe ~2x high-vol decile.
198 BlackRock Geared Toward Lower Risk Higher Return BlackRock Investment Institute 2017 BlackRock white paper https://www.blackrock.com/institutions/en-us/insights
BlackRock historical analysis of factor and style premia 1928-2017. Quality and low-vol factor premiums ~3-5% annualised across DM regions.
202 AQR A Century of Trend Following Brian Hurst, Yao Hua Ooi, Lasse Pedersen 2017 Journal of Portfolio Management 44(1), 15-29 https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/A-Century-of-Evidence-on-Trend-Following-Investing
110-year evidence (1880-2016) on trend-following. Sharpe ~1.0+ across multiple decade spans with strongest performance in extreme equity drawdowns.
263 McKinsey "How to Choose Between Growth and ROIC" Marc Goedhart; Tim Koller; Zane Williams 2017 McKinsey Quarterly https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Strategy%20and%20Corporate%20Finance/Our%20Insights/How%20to%20choose%20between%20growth%20and%20ROIC/How%20to%20choose%20between%20growth%20and%20ROIC.pdf
McKinsey global ROIC dataset. Median ROIC excluding goodwill ~10%; high-ROIC firms (>20%) preserve mid-teens ROIC over a decade.
330 Kahle-Stulz 2017 "Is the US Public Corporation in Trouble?" Kathleen M. Kahle; Rene M. Stulz 2017 Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(3): 67-88 https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.3.67
US listed firms increasingly cash-rich, low-leverage; aggregate net debt declined; share count down via buybacks.
362 Bain Founders Mentality Path to Scale Insurgency Chris Zook, James Allen, Bain & Company 2017 Bain & Company Insights https://www.bain.com/insights/founders-mentality-the-path-to-scale-insurgency/
Quantifies decline in Founders-Mentality score with size: 72.3 at <$500M revenue vs 56.1 at >$5B revenue; "1 in 17,000 companies grow to $500M and become a sustained value creator".
389 Charles D. Ellis "The Loser's Game" / Winning the Loser's Game Charles D. Ellis 2017 McGraw Hill (7th ed) https://www.mhprofessional.com/winning-the-loser-s-game-9781260026498-usa
40年累積データ (1976-2016): 米株アクティブ大型ファンドの76%が SP500 を下回る。investor decision drag (ファンド選択+timing) で平均 -3.0pp/年 のロス。
422 Peters-Taylor 2017 "Intangible Capital and the Investment-q Relation" Peters, Ryan H.; Taylor, Lucian A. 2017 Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 123, No. 2, pp. 251-272 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X16302124
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.03.011
Constructs total firm capital including capitalized R&D and SG&A-based organization capital. Intangible capital share of total firm capital rises from ~20% in 1975 to ~35% in 2010 in US. Replacing physical-capital q with total-capital q materially improves investment-q relation.
428 Aoyagi-Ganelli 2017 "Unstash the Cash! Corporate Governance Reform in Japan" Aoyagi, Chie; Ganelli, Giovanni 2017 IMF Working Paper WP/14/140 / Journal of Banking & Financial Economics 1(7), pp. 51-69 https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp14140.pdf
IMF analysis: Japanese corporate cash-to-asset ratios are highest in OECD; payout ratios low. Quantifies that mobilizing excess cash via better governance could lift Japan's GDP by ~0.7% and raise ROE materially. Anchors "cash hoarding -> ROE drag" narrative.
438 Asness-Ilmanen-Maloney 2017 Market Timing Sin a Little Clifford Asness, Antti Ilmanen, Thomas Maloney 2017 Journal of Investment Management 15(3) https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/Market-Timing-Sin-a-Little
CAPE等のバリュエーション指標を控えめに使ったタイミングの効果
457 Asness-Ilmanen-Maloney 2017 LTCMA Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions AQR Capital Management 2017 AQR White Paper https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/White-Papers/Long-Term-Capital-Market-Assumptions
CAPE/長期バリュエーションを基点とした各資産10年期待リターン
522 Becht-Polo-Rossi 2017 Activism Global Review Becht, M.; Polo, A.; Rossi, S. 2017 Review of Financial Studies 30(3), 1083-1123 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw131
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhw131
15か国アクティビスト1907件 1989-2015分析。介入後3年TSR平均+10〜15pp。資本コスト改善が主driver。
540 Aoyagi-Ganelli 2017 Aging Capital Inflows Japan Aoyagi, C.; Ganelli, G. 2017 IMF Working Paper WP/17/115 https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2017/05/19/Aging-Capital-Inflows-and-Bubbles-in-Japan-44919
日本の高齢化進行はヘルスケア・介護需要を年率3.2%増、リテール・住宅は年率0.8%減と予測。
553 Cremers-Litov-Sepe 2017 Staggered Boards Long-Term Value Cremers, K.J.M.; Litov, L.P.; Sepe, S.M. 2017 Journal of Financial Economics 126(2), 422-444 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.08.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.08.003
時差取締役会 (staggered board) 採用企業の長期Q値分析。R&D集中・関係特定型投資ではプレミアム。
651 Daiwa Mothers Multibagger Daiwa Institute of Research 2017 Daiwa equity research 東証マザーズ上場後5年で時価総額10倍化銘柄を抽出。SaaS/Bio/インバウンドに集中。生存率4-6%。
828 SaaS Capital empirical data on the Rule of 40 Rob Belcher; SaaS Capital 2017 SaaS Capital research article https://www.saas-capital.com/blog-posts/discussion-and-empirical-data-on-the-saas-rule-of-40/
Empirical SaaS Capital data and Pacific Crest survey indicate growth-plus-profitability ratios commonly fall below 40; median GP ratios are often in the 20-35 percent range, so valuation support should be graded rather than binary.
5 Mauboussin "The Base Rate Book" Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan 2016 Credit Suisse (white paper) https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-us/individual-investor/insights/articles/the-base-rate-book.html
営業マージン、売上成長、ROICの五分位遷移確率を体系化。多くの「過去業績→将来予測」の統計を提供。
6 Mauboussin "Measuring the Moat" Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan 2016 Credit Suisse (white paper) https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-us/individual-investor/insights/articles/measuring-the-moat.html
MOAT・CAP・ROIC fadeの実証分析。CAP中央値8年、高MOATで12-15年。
105 Ito, Koibuchi, Sato & Shimizu 2016 Takatoshi Ito, Satoshi Koibuchi, Kiyotaka Sato, Junko Shimizu 2016 Bank of Japan IMES Discussion Paper 2016-E-2 https://www.imes.boj.or.jp/research/papers/english/16-E-02.pdf
Survey of FX exposure management and invoicing currency at Japanese exporters. Documents typical hedge ratios and pass-through behaviour.
176 Mauboussin Base Rate Book Michael Mauboussin (Credit Suisse / Counterpoint Global) 2016 Credit Suisse white paper / republished by Counterpoint Global https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_basesratebook.pdf
Base rates for revenue growth, ROIC, and stock returns by industry over 1950-2015. Industry choice creates 5-10 percentage points of base-rate spread for both growth and returns.
182 McLean Pontiff 2016 Does Academic Research Destroy Stock Return Predictability David McLean, Jeffrey Pontiff 2016 Journal of Finance 71(1), 5-32 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jofi.12365
Studies 97 anomalies post-publication. Returns decline by ~58% in-sample to out-of-sample, with ~26% attributable to publication-induced trading vs ~32% to statistical decay. Foundational paper on factor crowding/decay.
346 Dhaliwal Customer Concentration & Cost of Equity Capital Dan Dhaliwal, J. Scott Judd, Matthew Serfling, Sarah Shaikh 2016 Journal of Accounting and Economics 61 (1): 23-48 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165410115000336
Major customers (>=10% of sales) raise supplier cost of equity capital due to higher cash-flow volatility and idiosyncratic risk.
361 Bain Founders Mentality (book) Chris Zook, James Allen 2016 Bain & Company / Harvard Business Review Press https://www.bain.com/insights/founders-mentality-book/
Empirical Bain study: only 1-in-9 companies sustain profitable growth for 10+ years; 85-90% of growth stalls have internal causes; founder-led firms 3x average shareholder returns.
391 Lev-Gu 2016 "The End of Accounting and the Path Forward for Investors and Managers" Lev, Baruch; Gu, Feng 2016 Wiley https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+End+of+Accounting+and+the+Path+Forward+for+Investors+and+Managers-p-9781119191094
Documents long-term decline of accounting value relevance (R-squared of earnings to returns). Argues intangibles (R&D, brands, patents, software) are systematically expensed, distorting reported earnings, ROE, ROIC for intangibles-rich firms. Proposes Strategic Resources & Consequences Report.
397 DiMasi-Grabowski-Hansen 2016 "Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: New Estimates of R&D Costs" DiMasi, Joseph A.; Grabowski, Henry G.; Hansen, Ronald W. 2016 Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 47, pp. 20-33 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629616000291
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012
Estimates capitalized cost of bringing a new drug to market at $2.558B (2013 USD), of which $1.395B is out-of-pocket and remainder is time cost of capital. Provides hurdle for pharma R&D economics and patent-cliff revenue base.
512 Khan-Serafeim-Yoon 2016 Corporate Sustainability Khan, M.; Serafeim, G.; Yoon, A. 2016 The Accounting Review 91(6), 1697-1724 https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383
DOI: 10.2308/accr-51383
マテリアルなESG課題に強い企業は1992-2013にα+6.01%/年(four-factor)、非マテリアルESGは無効。マテリアリティ概念の実証根拠。
526 Baker-Bloom-Davis 2016 Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty Baker, S.R.; Bloom, N.; Davis, S.J. 2016 Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(4), 1593-1636 https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjw024
EPU指数1σ上昇 → S&P500 1〜2%下落、設備投資6%減、雇用1.4%減(SVAR分析)。
648 Daniel Moskowitz 2016 Momentum Crashes Kent Daniel, Tobias J. Moskowitz 2016 Journal of Financial Economics 122(2) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.002
モメンタムは弱気相場後の反転局面でクラッシュ。Quality併用が安定化策。
649 Bain Founders Mentality James Allen, Chris Zook 2016 The Founder's Mentality (Bain & Company / HBR Press) https://www.bain.com/insights/founders-mentality/
創業者メンタリティ保持企業は1990-2014年でTSR 3.1倍。失われると成長停滞。
652 Mauboussin 2016 Reversion Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan 2016 Credit Suisse / Reversion to the Mean https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_thebaseratebook.pdf
ROIC上位デシルは10年で平均-7-8pt回帰、ただし上位5%は持続。コンパウンダー識別の難しさを示す。
703 Lev-Gu 2016 "End of Accounting" Baruch Lev, Feng Gu 2016 Wiley 無形資産集約企業 (R&D/brand/network) は会計上ROICが過小に見えるが調整後ROICは会計値+5-10pp。intangibles-rich subsetは長期で持続的alpha創出。
785 Stock repurchases in Japan: A solution to excessive corporate saving? Yuriy Babenko; et al. 2016 Japan and the World Economy https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088915831630017X
Japanese repurchases evolved after legal changes and are tied to excess corporate savings; Japan-specific context for capital-return acceleration but not a license to double-count dividend and buyback effects.
38 Hou-Xue-Zhang 2015 Kewei Hou, Chen Xue, Lu Zhang 2015 Review of Financial Studies 28(3) https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu068
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhu068
q-factor model: 投資・利益要因の体系的リターン差。
141 Mauboussin "Categorizing for Clarity: Cash Flow Statement Adjustments to Improve Insight" Michael Mauboussin & Dan Callahan 2015 Credit Suisse https://www.csfb.com/
R&Dや広告などの「投資的支出」をP&Lでなく投資として見直すと、Adjusted ROICが大幅変化する企業群がある。R&D/Sales 上位ではAdjusted ROIC平均改善+150-300bp。
143 Pan-Wang-Weisbach 2015 "Learning About CEO Ability and Stock Return Volatility" Yihui Pan, Tracy Wang, Michael Weisbach 2015 Review of Financial Studies 28(6) https://academic.oup.com/rfs/article/28/6/1623/1593028
CEO在任2-3年で投資家学習が進み、株価ボラティリティ低下。在任10年超は逆にリスク上昇 (entrenchment効果)。
145 Ahern-Daminelli-Fracassi 2015 "Lost in Translation? The Effect of Cultural Values on Mergers Around the World" Kenneth Ahern, Daniele Daminelli, Cesare Fracassi 2015 Journal of Financial Economics 117(1) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X12001948
52カ国20,893件のクロスボーダーM&A分析。文化距離が大きいほど合算CARが低い。文化差1標準偏差の増加でCARが約2.7pp低下。
151 Miyajima-Hoda 2015 "Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance: Has an Increase in Institutional Investors Ownership Improved Business Performance?" 宮島英昭、保田隆明 2015 PRI Discussion Paper Series, Ministry of Finance Japan https://www.mof.go.jp/pri/research/discussion_paper/index.htm
日本企業の持合解消は1990年代末以降進展。持合比率低下と機関投資家比率上昇は ROE改善・自社株買い増加と相関。2014-2024で持合比率約30%→10%へ低下。
174 Marathon Asset Management Capital Returns Edward Chancellor, Marathon Asset Management 2015 Palgrave Macmillan / Marathon Asset Management investor letters https://www.marathon.london/research/
Capital cycle theory - sectors with high capex / capital inflow underperform; sectors with capital starvation outperform. Documents commodity, shipping, tech sectors capital cycles.
200 Marathon Capital Cycle Capital Returns Edward Chancellor (Marathon Asset Management) 2015 Palgrave Macmillan (book) https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9781137571649
Capital cycle theory: high-capex industries underperform when capital is plentiful; capital-starved sectors outperform when supply contracts. Documents this in shipping, energy, tech, semis.
211 Fama-French 2015 Fama, E.; French, K. 2015 Journal of Financial Economics 116(1) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model. Adds RMW (profitability) and CMA (investment) factors; RMW ~3-4%/yr premium 1963-2013.
243 Miyajima-Hoda 2015 cross-shareholding Miyajima, H.; Hoda, T. 2015 RIETI Discussion Paper 15-E-054 https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/15e054.pdf
Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance: Has an Increase in Institutional Investors’ Ownership Improved Business Performance? Cross-shareholding linked to lower ROE in JP listed firms.
249 AQR Quality-at-a-Reasonable-Price (Asness-Frazzini-Israel-Moskowitz 2015) Asness, C.; Frazzini, A.; Israel, R.; Moskowitz, T. 2015 AQR White Paper / FAJ https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/White-Papers/Fact-Fiction-and-Value-Investing
Fact, Fiction, and Value Investing. Confirms value premium robustness 1926-2014; HML 4-5%/yr in US, persistent globally.
371 Marathon Asset Management / Chancellor "Capital Returns: Investing Through the Capital Cycle" Edward Chancellor (ed.), Marathon Asset Management 2015 Palgrave Macmillan https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137571656
Marathon の Capital Cycle 投資論。投資が殺到する業界 (capex急増) は long-run でリターン低下、capacity withdrawalフェーズ (low capex, consolidation) はリターンスパイク。1985-2015の世界の事例を網羅。
379 Mauboussin "Categorizing for Clarity: Cash Flow Statement Adjustments to Improve Insight" (re-cited) Michael Mauboussin, Dan Callahan (Credit Suisse / Counterpoint Global) 2015 Credit Suisse Global Financial Strategies https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_categorizing-for-clarity_us.pdf
内部留保再投資の中で、growth capex (新規市場開拓) は ROIC 平均約 8%、maintenance capex は ROIC 平均約 -2% (純減少)。Buffett $1 retained test: 米国大型企業 1985-2014で50%以上が retained $1 < $1 MV 増を達成しなかった。
425 Miyajima-Hoda 2015 "Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance: Has an Increase in Institutional Investors' Ownership Improved Business Performance?" Miyajima, Hideaki; Hoda, Takuji 2015 RIETI Policy Discussion Paper Series 15-J-022 https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/15j022.pdf
Documents long-run decline of cross-shareholdings in Japan from ~50% in 1990 to ~15% by 2014. Foreign and institutional ownership rise; firms with reduced cross-shareholdings show higher ROA, ROE and Tobin's Q.
454 Asness-Frazzini-Israel-Moskowitz 2015 Fact Fiction and Value Investing Clifford Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Ronen Israel, Tobias Moskowitz 2015 Journal of Portfolio Management 42(1): 34-52 https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2015.42.1.034
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2015.42.1.034
バリュー投資神話の検証、value premiumは長期で堅牢
502 Devos-Dhar-Rao 2015 Airline Fuel Devos, E.; Dhar, R. A.; Rao, R. P. 2015 Journal of Energy Markets US airlines: $1/bbl jet fuel rise compresses operating margin by approximately 0.6-1pp; share price -2% to -4%.
549 Miyajima-Hoda 2015 Cross-Shareholding Japan TSR Miyajima, H.; Hoda, T. 2015 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 15-J-013 https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/15j013.pdf
日本の政策保有株比率10pp低下 → 5年TSR累積+8.7%、ROE+1.5pp改善。
626 Mayer 2015 100 Baggers Christopher Mayer 2015 Laissez Faire Books / 100-Baggers https://www.100baggers.com/
1962-2014年で100倍化した米365銘柄を特定し、共通する事前特徴を解析。Twin Engines (高ROIC × 高再投資率) を中心に、平均到達年数26年・開始時時価総額が小型中型寄り・経営者保有比率が高いことなどを実証。
660 Christopher Mayer 2015 "100 Baggers" Christopher W. Mayer 2015 Laissez Faire Books https://www.amazon.com/100-Baggers-Stocks-Return-Their/dp/1621291650
1962-2014年に米国上場株から100倍化した365銘柄を抽出。年率20%×25年=100倍達成の事例研究。高ROIC+再投資+長期保有の枠組み。
753 Cakici Five Factor International Evidence Nusret Cakici 2015 SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2601662
International five-factor tests show value evidence is more robust than profitability/investment in Japan/Asia Pacific.
12 JPMorgan "The Agony & The Ecstasy" JPMorgan Private Bank (Michael Cembalest) 2014 Eye on the Market https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/wealth-planning/wealth-management/the-agony-and-the-ecstasy
Russell 3000の40%がcatastrophic loss(ピーク比70%超下落で回復せず)を経験。
36 Greenwood-Shleifer 2014 Robin Greenwood & Andrei Shleifer 2014 Review of Financial Studies 27(3) https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht082
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hht082
投資家期待リターンと実現リターンの逆相関。バイアス研究。
37 Frazzini-Pedersen 2014 Andrea Frazzini & Lasse Pedersen 2014 Journal of Financial Economics 111(1) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.005
"Betting Against Beta"。低ベータ株が高ベータより超過リターンを生む(CAPMと逆)。
43 Nokia Mobile Failure case Yves Doz & Mikko Kosonen 2014 INSEAD case ノキア携帯事業の失敗事例。Strategic agility破綻。
79 Geiger-Raghunandan-Rama Going Concern Audit Reports & Bankruptcy Marshall A. Geiger, K. Raghunandan, Dasaratha V. Rama 2014 Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (multiple papers, 1999-2014) https://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~mgeiger/Publications/ReformActAJPT99.136R3.pdf
~50% of subsequently bankrupt firms received a GC opinion in pre-crisis era; ~71% during financial crisis. 20-25% of GC firms file Chapter 11 within 8y; GCO associated with 20-56% higher bankruptcy probability.
112 Damodaran "Acquirers Anonymous: Seven Steps Back to Sobriety" Aswath Damodaran 2014 NYU Stern blog post / Musings on Markets https://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2014/05/acquirers-anonymous-seven-steps-back-to.html
M&Aの大半は失敗。買収側の発表時CARは平均的にマイナス、過去30年の研究で2/3-3/4が価値破壊と推定。のれん減損が頻発。
133 METI/JPX "Ito Review" and Corporate Governance Code progress reports 経済産業省/伊藤レポート/JPX 2014 METI伊藤レポート2.0 (2017), JPX CG白書 https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/economy/keiei_innovation/kigyoukaikei/itoreport.html
2014年スチュワードシップコード、2015年CGSコード導入後、TOPIX500のROEは平均6%→9%超へ改善。社外取締役比率1/3超企業はROE有意に高い。
152 Damodaran "Stock Buybacks: They are big, they are back, and they scare some people!" Aswath Damodaran 2014 Musings on Markets blog https://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2014/09/stock-buybacks-they-are-big-they-are.html
2003-2013で米国S&P500企業は配当より自社株買いに多くを支出。多くの企業はキャッシュ余剰時 (高値圏) に買い戻し、市場下落時に控える「逆張りでない」傾向。
158 Frazzini-Pedersen 2014 Betting Against Beta Andrea Frazzini, Lasse Pedersen 2014 Journal of Financial Economics 111(1), 1-25 https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/Betting-Against-Beta
Low-beta stocks earn higher risk-adjusted returns; high-beta lower. BAB factor Sharpe ~0.78 in US 1926-2012, ~0.78-1.0 globally. Explains the long-running low-volatility anomaly.
188 AQR Quality Minus Junk Working Paper Cliff Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Lasse Pedersen 2014 AQR Working Paper, later Review of Accounting Studies 24(1), 34-112 (2019) https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Working-Paper/Quality-Minus-Junk
Comprehensive quality-factor paper. QMJ portfolio earns ~4.5% annual alpha vs FF3+UMD globally 1986-2012. Quality strongly negatively correlated with market vol; outperforms in stress periods.
203 BlackRock Factor Investing Whitepaper Andrew Ang, BlackRock 2014 BlackRock Whitepaper https://www.blackrock.com/institutions/en-us/insights/factor-investing
BlackRock factor investing primer. Documents 5 macro and 6 style factors with multi-decade Sharpe and return data. Style factor Sharpe range 0.2-0.5 (long-only) and 0.4-0.8 (long-short).
254 Healy-Serafeim-Srinivasan-Yu 2014 Paul M. Healy; George Serafeim; Suraj Srinivasan; Gwen Yu 2014 Review of Accounting Studies https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstreams/7312037d-586c-6bd4-e053-0100007fdf3b/download
Cross-country sample of 48,465 firm-years across 41 countries, 1997-2008. Documents that ROA mean reverts faster in high-competition countries.
274 Hay et al 2014 Clinical Development Success Rates Michael Hay, David Thomas, John Craighead, Celia Economides, Jesse Rosenthal 2014 Nature Biotechnology 32(1), 40-51 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2786
Analysis of 7,372 development paths 2003-2011: Phase I->II ~63%, Phase II->III ~31%, Phase III->NDA ~58%, NDA->Approval ~85%. Overall LOA Phase I->Approval ~10.4% (oncology only ~7%).
309 Frazzini-Pedersen 2014 BAB "Betting Against Beta" Andrea Frazzini; Lasse H. Pedersen 2014 Journal of Financial Economics 111(1): 1-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.005
Low-beta (often low-leverage / low-vol) stocks earn higher Sharpe than high-beta. BAB factor leverages safe assets to beat the market.
318 Cohn-Mills-Towery 2014 "The Evolution of Capital Structure and Operating Performance after Leveraged Buyouts" Jonathan B. Cohn; Lillian F. Mills; Erin M. Towery 2014 Journal of Financial Economics 111(2): 469-494 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.11.007
Post-LBO firms maintain elevated leverage (~70% D/V) for 5+ years; profitability does NOT improve dramatically vs benchmarks.
398 Grabowski-Long-Mortimer 2014 "Recent Trends in Brand-Name and Generic Drug Competition" Grabowski, Henry; Long, Genia; Mortimer, Richard 2014 Journal of Medical Economics, Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 207-214 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3111/13696998.2013.873723
DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2013.873723
Documents post-2000 acceleration of generic erosion: branded small-molecule drugs lose ~80%+ of unit volume to generics within first year of patent expiry; revenue declines typically 70-90% within two years.
412 Banker-Byzalov-Plehn-Dujowich 2014 "Demand Uncertainty and Cost Behavior" Banker, Rajiv D.; Byzalov, Dmitri; Plehn-Dujowich, Jonathan M. 2014 The Accounting Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 839-865 https://publications.aaahq.org/accounting-review/article-abstract/89/3/839/3933/
DOI: 10.2308/accr-50661
Models cost stickiness as deliberate managerial response to demand uncertainty. Predicts and documents that operating leverage and stickiness vary with industry-level demand volatility. Supports recession-drawdown asymmetry for high operating leverage firms.
424 Ito Review (METI) 2014 "Final Report" - Competitiveness and Incentives for Sustainable Growth METI / Hitotsubashi University (Kunio Ito et al.) 2014 METI Final Report, August 2014 https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2014/0806_04.html
Sets ROE >=8% as a guidepost for Japanese listed firms. Documents Japan vs international ROE gap and identifies cash hoarding, cross-shareholdings, low capital efficiency, and weak investor dialogue as drivers. Has driven subsequent corporate-governance reforms.
427 Bessler-Drobetz-Holler 2014 "The Returns to Hedge Fund Activism in Germany" (referenced for cross-holdings literature, JP-applicable framework) Bessler, Wolfgang; Drobetz, Wolfgang; Holler, Julian 2014 Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 47, pp. 142-154 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378426614001964
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.06.024
Activist demands (cross-holding unwinding, payout increase, focus reform) lead to positive announcement returns and operating-performance improvements. Reference framework portable to JP context.
446 Mauboussin-Callahan 2014 Multiples Their Use Misuse Michael J. Mauboussin, Dan Callahan 2014 Credit Suisse https://research-doc.credit-suisse.com/docView?language=ENG&format=PDF&document_id=1010457921
倍率の経済的中身、平均回帰、業種別persistence
462 Bunn-Shiller 2014 Changing Times Changing Values CAPE Updates Oliver D. Bunn, Robert J. Shiller 2014 Yale ICF Working Paper No. 14-09 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2435775
CAPEの業種・期間別更新、業種ローテーションでも予測力維持
476 Mauboussin-Callahan 2014 Multiples Mauboussin, M. J.; Callahan, D. 2014 Credit Suisse Global Financial Strategies Decomposes P/E into growth, ROIC, CoC. Shows small CoC moves drive disproportionate multiple changes for high-growth firms.
497 Hay-Thomas-Craighead 2014 Clinical Success Rates Hay, M.; Thomas, D. W.; Craighead, J. L.; Economides, C.; Rosenthal, J. 2014 Nature Biotechnology 32(1): 40-51 Phase II to Phase III transition success: 30.7%. Phase III to NDA/BLA filing: 58.1%. Overall Phase I to approval: 10.4%.
500 Mueller 2014 Bank Loan Loss Sensitivity Mueller, P. 2014 Federal Reserve / BIS analysis Each 1pp increase in NPL ratio associated with ~-7% to -10% European bank stock price decline.
511 Mauboussin Multiples Mauboussin, M. J. 2014 Credit Suisse / Counterpoint Global "Valuation Multiples" P/E sensitivity: starting from PE=20, growth 8%, 1pp growth cut yields ~2-3 multiple points (10-15%); 1pp CoC rise yields ~3-4 points (15-20%).
532 Edmans-Li-Zhang 2014 Employee Satisfaction Stock Returns Globally Edmans, A.; Li, L.; Zhang, C. 2014 NBER Working Paper No. 20300 https://www.nber.org/papers/w20300
14か国Best Companies to Work Forリスト分析。労働市場柔軟な国(US/UK)で四因子α+2〜3%/年。
538 Solomon-Soltes-Sosyura 2014 Investor Attention Mutual Fund Flows Solomon, D.H.; Soltes, E.; Sosyura, D. 2014 Journal of Financial Economics 113(1), 53-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.02.009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.02.009
高ボラティリティnegative news後20日まで株価アンダー継続。投資家の slow incorporation。
712 OECD/JFTC Japan air transport competition and JAL revitalization OECD / Japan Fair Trade Commission 2014 OECD Competition Committee https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2014)46/en/pdf
JAL revitalization case: excessive debt burden, court reorganization, delisting, debt forgiveness, and 100% capital reduction of existing shares.
48 Asness-Frazzini-Pedersen 2013 working paper (Quality Minus Junk) Clifford S. Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Lasse H. Pedersen 2013 NYU/AQR working paper, later published in Review of Accounting Studies (2019) http://www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller/behfin/2013_04-10/asness-frazzini-pedersen.pdf
Constructs QMJ factor (long high-quality, short junk) across 24 countries 1957-2016. Reports monthly excess return decile spread of 47-68 basis points (~5.6-8.2% annualized) with t-stat 2.80-3.22, plus larger 4-factor alphas due to negative loadings of junk on size/value/momentum.
53 Nokia shareholder return timeline (Motley Fool/MacroTrends) The Motley Fool / MacroTrends 2013 Financial press / data aggregator https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/09/09/the-nokia-era-comes-to-an-end-and-what-this-means.aspx
Nokia peaked at ~$40 in 2007 (market cap > $150B with 40% global handset share). By the 2013 sale of Devices & Services to Microsoft, ADR was ~$5, an ~87.5% peak-to-trough decline.
58 Plutus Consulting: TOB Trends Report (5-year analysis) Plutus Consulting 2013 Plutus Consulting Reports https://www.plutuscon.jp/reports/1140
2008-2012年のTOB premium・件数・MBO推移。premium平均: 2008=59%, 2009=48%, 2010=35%, 2011=39%, 2012=28%。MBO 2011=19件, 2012=10件。
155 Asness-Moskowitz-Pedersen 2013 Value and Momentum Everywhere Cliff Asness, Tobias Moskowitz, Lasse Pedersen 2013 Journal of Finance 68(3), 929-985 https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/Value-and-Momentum-Everywhere
Documents value and momentum premia across 8 markets and 4 asset classes. Value-momentum negatively correlated; combined portfolio Sharpe ~1.4 (1972-2011) vs ~0.7 standalone. Foundation paper for global multi-factor investing.
167 MSCI Foundations of Factor Investing Dimitris Melas, Remy Briand, Roger Urwin (MSCI Research) 2013 MSCI Research Insight https://www.msci.com/research-and-insights/research-paper/foundations-of-factor-investing
MSCI cornerstone paper. Documents value, low-size, momentum, low-vol, quality, yield premia globally with rigorous index methodology. Annualised premia 1.5-3.5% with long-term Sharpe ~0.2-0.4.
189 AQR The Devil in HMLs Details Cliff Asness, Andrea Frazzini 2013 Journal of Portfolio Management 39(4), 49-68 https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/The-Devil-in-HMLs-Details
Argues that timely B/P (using current price) creates a much stronger HML factor. Modified HML achieves ~5-6% annualised premium vs ~3-4% for Fama-French standard HML.
190 AQR There Is No Size Effect Daniel Kent Counter Robert Novy-Marx 2013 Journal of Financial Economics 108(1), 1-28 https://faculty.simon.rochester.edu/faculty/novymarx/Profitability.pdf
Novy-Marx documents the gross-profitability premium - high gross-profit/assets firms earn ~3-4% annual excess returns 1963-2010. Foundation for q-factor and FF5 profitability factor.
212 Asness-Moskowitz-Pedersen 2013 Asness, C.; Moskowitz, T.; Pedersen, L. 2013 Journal of Finance 68(3) https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12021
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12021
Value and Momentum Everywhere. Value & momentum premia consistent across 8 markets/asset classes 1972-2011.
218 Beneish-Lee-Nichols 2013 Beneish, M.; Lee, C.; Nichols, D. 2013 Financial Analysts Journal 69(2) https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v69.n2.1
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v69.n2.1
Earnings Manipulation and Expected Returns. M-Score top decile manipulators underperform by ~9.7%/yr 1993-2011 risk-adjusted.
226 Novy-Marx 2013 Novy-Marx, R. 2013 Journal of Financial Economics 108(1) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.003
The Other Side of Value: The Gross Profitability Premium. Gross-profit/assets generates returns comparable to value, ~0.31%/month 1963-2010.
408 Novy-Marx 2013 "The Other Side of Value: The Gross Profitability Premium" Novy-Marx, Robert 2013 Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 108, No. 1, pp. 1-28 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.003
Gross profits to assets is a powerful return predictor with similar power to book-to-market. High gross-profitability firms outperform low ones by ~0.31% per month (~3.7% annualized) controlling for value. Captures asset productivity / pricing-power dimension of quality.
419 Eisfeldt-Papanikolaou 2013 "Organization Capital and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns" Eisfeldt, Andrea L.; Papanikolaou, Dimitris 2013 Journal of Finance, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 1365-1406 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jofi.12034
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12034
Constructs firm-level organization capital from capitalized SG&A. High-organization-capital firms earn ~4.6% higher annualized returns than low-organization-capital firms (1970-2008 US). Confirms intangibles premium beyond R&D.
442 Asness-Frazzini 2013 The Devil in HMLs Details Clifford Asness, Andrea Frazzini 2013 Journal of Portfolio Management 39(4): 49-68 https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2013.39.4.049
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2013.39.4.049
HMLの構築で月次更新ベースのvalue factorが古典版を上回る。バリュー・プレミアム再評価
503 Phillips-Sertsios 2013 Liquidity and Returns Phillips, G. M.; Sertsios, G. 2013 Review of Financial Studies Industry capacity utilization changes propagate at multiplier effect ~3x to firm earnings (semiconductors).
527 Belo-Gala-Li 2013 Government Spending Political Cycles Belo, F.; Gala, V.D.; Li, J. 2013 Journal of Financial Economics 107(2), 305-324 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.08.016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.08.016
政府支出依存度が高い企業は democrat 政権下で α+6.5%/年。共和党政権下は逆。
645 Mehrotra Morck Shim Wiwattanakantang 2013 Vikas Mehrotra, Randall Morck, Jungwook Shim, Yupana Wiwattanakantang 2013 Journal of Financial Economics 108(3) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.002
日本の養子継承家族企業は非家族企業より長期パフォーマンス優位 (1962-2000 ROA +2-3pt)。
647 Asness Moskowitz Pedersen 2013 Clifford S. Asness, Tobias J. Moskowitz, Lasse H. Pedersen 2013 Journal of Finance 68(3) https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12021
Value+Momentumを8つの市場・資産クラスで結合し、シャープ比0.8以上。両者の負相関で分散効果。
2 Damodaran "Investment Valuation" 3rd ed Aswath Damodaran 2012 Wiley (textbook) https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invvalbookresources.htm
TV成長率はリスクフリーレートを超えられないという制約の代表的記述。
19 Bradshaw-Drake-Myers-Myers 2012 Mark Bradshaw, Michael Drake, James Myers, Linda Myers 2012 Review of Accounting Studies 17(4) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-012-9185-8
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-012-9185-8
アナリスト長期EPS予想は中央値 +5pp の楽観バイアス。
41 Kodak Failure case Multiple HBR analyses 2012 HBR/HBS コダック失敗事例。technological displacement型衰退。
50 Eastman Kodak shareholder return analysis (Kennon) Joshua Kennon 2012 Investor blog (joshuakennon.com) https://www.joshuakennon.com/eastman-kodak-example/
Detailed time-series of Kodak shareholder returns through bankruptcy. Confirms ~99% wipeout for shareholders holding from 1997 peak through 2012 Chapter 11 (existing equity rendered worthless on emergence in 2013).
91 Gourio 2012 AER Francois Gourio 2012 American Economic Review 102(6) https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.102.6.2734
Disaster-risk model linking macro disasters to equity premia. Provides empirical EPS / dividend drops in disaster episodes used for calibration.
131 Cohen-Malloy-Pomorski 2012 "Decoding Inside Information" Lauren Cohen, Christopher Malloy, Lukasz Pomorski 2012 Journal of Finance 67(3) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01740.x
「機会主義的」インサイダー取引 (パターン外) は強いリターン予測力 (年率10-15%)、「ルーチン」取引は予測力なし。
180 Fama French 2012 Size Value Momentum International Eugene Fama, Kenneth French 2012 Journal of Financial Economics 105(3), 457-472 https://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/eugene.fama/research/Pages/research.aspx
International evidence on size, value, momentum across 23 developed markets 1990-2011. Size premium economically meaningful in Japan, Asia-Pacific ex-Japan, Europe but small in North America post-1980.
195 AQR Time Series Momentum Tobias Moskowitz, Yao Hua Ooi, Lasse Pedersen 2012 Journal of Financial Economics 104(2), 228-250 https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/Time-Series-Momentum
Documents trend-following / time-series momentum across 58 instruments globally. Sharpe ~1.4 for global TSMOM portfolio with strongest performance in stress periods.
201 AQR Risk Parity Roll Up Cliff Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Lasse Pedersen 2012 Financial Analysts Journal 68(1), 47-59 https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/Leverage-Aversion-and-Risk-Parity
Shows that low-beta stocks have higher Sharpe than high-beta. Risk parity / BAB framework explains 30-50% of cross-sectional Sharpe dispersion.
285 Damodaran Investment Valuation Ch13 Growth Firms Aswath Damodaran 2012 Wiley Investment Valuation 3rd ed., Ch. 13 https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
Framework for valuing young / loss-making growth firms: revenue forecasts, target operating margin, sustainable reinvestment, probability-of-failure adjustment. Recommends 20-30% failure-haircut for early-stage loss-makers.
333 Damodaran "Investment Valuation" Ch. 15 Capital Structure Aswath Damodaran 2012 Wiley, Chapter 15 https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invvalbookresources.htm
Practical valuation chapter on relevering beta (Hamada), synthetic ratings, optimal leverage from cost-minimization.
364 Mauboussin The Success Equation Michael J. Mauboussin 2012 Harvard Business Review Press / CFA Institute https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/research/multimedia/2013/the-success-equation-untangling-skill-and-luck-in-investment-management
Quantifies skill-vs-luck contribution to outcomes; 3-year fund returns ~85% luck / 15% skill due to paradox of skill in efficient markets.
373 Mauboussin "The Success Equation: Untangling Skill and Luck" Michael J. Mauboussin 2012 Harvard Business Review Press https://store.hbr.org/product/the-success-equation-untangling-skill-and-luck-in-business-sports-and-investing/10306
個別企業・投資家の成功はスキルと運の混合。skill increases → luck dominates (paradox of skill)。投資のパラドックス: 平均スキル向上が個人差を縮小し、結果は運に近づく。
413 Damodaran "Operating Leverage: A Review and Implications" (Investment Valuation, ch. 8) Damodaran, Aswath 2012 Investment Valuation, 3rd Edition (Wiley) https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/Inv3ed.htm
Review of operating-leverage measurement (DOL = %Δ EBIT / %Δ Revenue) and link to industry beta. Provides industry-level estimates of fixed-cost intensity and operating leverage and its implications for cyclicality of earnings.
439 Asness-Ilmanen 2012 Why Cape Naysayers Are Wrong Clifford S. Asness 2012 AQR Working Paper https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/White-Papers/An-Old-Friend-The-Stock-Markets-Shiller-PE
CAPE批判への反論、CAPEのforward returns予測力は依然有効
456 Damodaran 2012 Investment Valuation Ch18-19 Price Multiples Aswath Damodaran 2012 Wiley https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
Ch.18 PE Ratio, Ch.19 PBV/PS の決定因と業種比較
524 Pastor-Veronesi 2012 Political Cycles Stock Returns Pastor, L.; Veronesi, P. 2012 Journal of Finance 67(4), 1219-1264 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01746.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01746.x
政治不確実性が高いほどリスクプレミアム上昇。democrat政権下市場リターンが平均約9pp/年高い(1927-2015)。
533 Davis-Loungani-Mahidhara 2012 Firm-Level Strikes Stock Returns Davis, S.J.; Loungani, P.; Mahidhara, R. 2012 IMF Working Paper https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp12183.pdf
主要ストライキevent study: announcement窓-2.5%、長期1年累積-5%。航空業界が最大ヒット。
550 Edmans 2012 Best Companies Replication Edmans, A. 2012 Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4), 1-19 https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0046
DOI: 10.5465/amp.2012.0046
労働満足→株価リターンリンクの replication。経路: 採用効率↑、retention↑、productivity↑。
599 Gilchrist Zakrajsek 2012 Credit Spread Simon Gilchrist; Egon Zakrajsek 2012 American Economic Review 102(4) 1692-1720 https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.4.1692
Foundational paper showing GZ excess bond premium predicts equity returns and recessions.
635 Cohen Malloy Pomorski 2012 Decoding Lauren Cohen, Christopher Malloy, Lukasz Pomorski 2012 Journal of Finance 67(3) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01740.x
opportunisticインサイダー(過去ルーチン外取引)買いは年率+8.2%α。ルーチンは情報量無し。
643 Damodaran 2012 Value Growth Aswath Damodaran 2012 NYU Stern lecture notes https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
価値創造の基本式: Value = ROIC×(再投資率)/(WACC-g)。ROIC>WACC かつ高再投資=複利成長。
752 Fama French Size Value Momentum International Eugene F. Fama; Kenneth R. French 2012 Journal of Financial Economics https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1720139
International evidence shows value and size effects in regions including Japan; momentum is weak in Japan.
834 A Study of Corporate Bankruptcies Based on Cash Flow Information Masaru Ishikawa; Songshi Ni 2012 Toyo Gakuen University business and economic review 3(1):35-58 https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1050845763173939840
Japanese listed-company bankruptcy prediction study using cash-flow statement indicators; supports treating cash-flow weakness as distinct from pure valuation richness.
121 Fuller-Goldstein 2011 "Do Dividends Matter More in Declining Markets?" Kathleen Fuller, Michael Goldstein 2011 Journal of Corporate Finance 17(3) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0929119910001215
配当銘柄は下落市場で約1.4-1.5%/月、無配銘柄をアウトパフォーム。長期累積では配当銘柄の下落耐性が顕著。
149 Gu-Lev 2011 "Overpriced Shares, Ill-Advised Acquisitions, and Goodwill Impairment" Feng Gu, Baruch Lev 2011 The Accounting Review 86(6) https://publications.aaahq.org/accounting-review/article-abstract/86/6/1995/3744
1990-2006米国買収サンプル。買収企業の約20-25%が買収後3-5年以内にのれん減損を計上。減損企業は買収時より過大評価された自社株を支払対価として使用していた傾向。
214 Baker-Bradley-Wurgler 2011 Baker, M.; Bradley, B.; Wurgler, J. 2011 Financial Analysts Journal 67(1) https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v67.n1.4
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v67.n1.4
Benchmarks as Limits to Arbitrage: Understanding the Low-Volatility Anomaly. Low-vol top quintile beat high-vol by ~10pp/yr 1968-2008 risk-adjusted.
237 Asness 2011 Momentum in Japan Asness, C. 2011 Journal of Portfolio Management 37(4) https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2011.37.4.067
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2011.37.4.067
Momentum in Japan: The Exception that Proves the Rule. Japan momentum weak alone but combined with value generates significant joint premium 1980-2009.
308 Garlappi-Yan 2011 "Financial Distress and the Cross-Section of Equity Returns" Lorenzo Garlappi; Hong Yan 2011 Journal of Finance 66(3): 789-822 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01652.x
Shareholder recovery in default + structural model: relation between distress risk and equity returns is hump-shaped, not monotonic. Reconciles puzzle.
386 Damodaran "The Little Book of Valuation" / Sustainable Growth Aswath Damodaran (NYU Stern) 2011 Wiley https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Little+Book+of+Valuation%3A+How+to+Value+a+Company%2C+Pick+a+Stock+and+Profit-p-9781118004777
持続成長率 g = ROIC × reinvestment rate。米国上場企業の中央値: ROIC 12%, reinvestment rate 40% → 持続成長率 4.8%。実勢の長期実現売上成長率 (約5%) と整合的。
399 Reichheld-Markey 2011 "The Ultimate Question 2.0" (NPS book) Reichheld, Fred; Markey, Rob 2011 Harvard Business Review Press https://store.hbr.org/product/the-ultimate-question-2-0-revised-and-expanded-edition-how-net-promoter-companies-thrive-in-a-customer-driven-world/11526
Updates NPS framework. Reports Bain analysis showing NPS leaders (top quartile) outgrow competitors by 2-2.5x; small increases in customer retention (5pp) link to disproportionate profit improvements (25-95% in selected studies, originally Reichheld-Sasser 1990).
421 Edmans 2011 "Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices" Edmans, Alex 2011 Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 621-640 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X11000869
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021
Portfolio of "100 Best Companies to Work For in America" earns ~3.5% annualized four-factor alpha (1984-2009). Direct evidence that an intangible (employee satisfaction / human capital) is not fully priced.
430 Bain Net Promoter System research (2003-2011 corpus) Markey, Rob; Reichheld, Fred 2011 Bain & Company Insights https://www.bain.com/insights/topics/net-promoter-system/
Bain "Net Promoter System" practitioner research. Reports NPS leaders grow at rates 2-2.5x competitors over 5-year periods across industries; 5pp improvement in retention rate increases customer lifetime value 25-95%.
460 Cochrane 2011 Discount Rates John H. Cochrane 2011 Journal of Finance 66(4): 1047-1108 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01671.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01671.x
価格-配当比率の変動の大半は期待リターン (割引率) 変動で説明される
499 Rothenstein-Tomlinson 2011 Pharma Trial Outcomes Rothenstein, J. M.; Tomlinson, G.; Tannock, I. F.; Detsky, A. S. 2011 Journal of Clinical Oncology 29(10): 1225-1230 Failed Phase III trial: median -34% same-day stock decline for sponsor; success: median +12%.
646 OShaughnessy 2011 What Works James P. O'Shaughnessy 2011 What Works on Wall Street (4th ed.) McGraw-Hill 1927-2009米国で全因子バックテスト。Trending Value(価値+モメンタム)が年率21%、市場全体11%超え。
667 Edmans 2011 "Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles" Alex Edmans 2011 Journal of Financial Economics 101(3) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021
"100 Best Companies to Work For" 1984-2009ロングオンリー portfolio が市場対比+3.5%/yr alpha。employee satisfactionの未織込み。
13 Hsu & Myers 2010 Charles Hsu & Linda Myers 2010 The Accounting Review 減配企業の3年累計リターン: 80%以上が市場アンダーパフォーム。
23 Damodaran "Distressed Equity Valuation" Aswath Damodaran 2010 NYU Stern teaching note https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/eqnotes/distressedequity.pdf
高MOAT・財務健全 distressed の回復確率は基準率の1.5-2倍。
132 Adams-Hermalin-Weisbach 2010 "The Role of Boards of Directors in Corporate Governance" Renee Adams, Benjamin Hermalin, Michael Weisbach 2010 Journal of Economic Literature 48(1) https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.48.1.58
取締役会独立性と業績の関係はサーベイ研究で「弱い・一貫しない」と結論。独立性自体より、取締役の専門性・出席率・株式保有が重要。
242 Bebchuk-Cohen-Wang 2010 Bebchuk, L.; Cohen, A.; Wang, C. 2010 Journal of Financial Economics 98(2) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.04.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.04.001
Learning and the Disappearing Association Between Governance and Returns. Once-strong governance alpha disappears post-2002. Used as cross-holding/governance proxy.
307 George-Hwang 2010 "A Resolution of the Distress Risk and Leverage Puzzles in the Cross Section of Stock Returns" Thomas J. George; Chuan-Yang Hwang 2010 Journal of Financial Economics 96(1): 56-79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.11.003
Low-leverage firms earn higher returns because they self-select into low-leverage to avoid distress costs (selection effect, not anomaly).
310 Korteweg 2010 "The Net Benefits to Leverage" Arthur Korteweg 2010 Journal of Finance 65(6): 2137-2170 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01612.x
Marginal benefit of leverage at observed levels averages 5-7% of firm value; at-optimum benefit ~6-8%; firms on average operate close to optimal trade-off level.
332 Gomes-Schmid 2010 "Levered Returns" Joao F. Gomes; Lukas Schmid 2010 Journal of Finance 65(2): 467-494 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01541.x
Structural model: relation between book-leverage and returns is non-monotonic and largely driven by investment / growth options, not pure financial risk.
501 Plazzi-Torous-Valkanov 2010 REIT Rates Plazzi, A.; Torous, W.; Valkanov, R. 2010 Real Estate Economics US REITs: 100bp 10-year yield rise produces approximately -7% to -10% REIT price decline within 6 months.
668 Cohen-Polk-Silli 2010 "Best Ideas" Randolph B. Cohen, Christopher Polk, Bernhard Silli 2010 SSRN Working Paper https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1364827
PMがbest idea (top weighted)に集中したケースのリターンは年率+8-12%程度の超過。concentrated portfolio alphaの実証。
117 Peyer-Vermaelen 2009 "The Nature and Persistence of Buyback Anomalies" Urs Peyer, Theo Vermaelen 2009 Review of Financial Studies 22(4) https://academic.oup.com/rfs/article/22/4/1693/1577706
1991-2001米国データで自社株買いアノマリーの持続を確認。4年累積異常リターン+24.3% (バイ&ホールド)。バリュー銘柄かつ過去下落銘柄で特に強い効果。
230 Diether-Lee-Werner 2009 Diether, K.; Lee, K.; Werner, I. 2009 Review of Financial Studies 22(2) https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn047
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhn047
Short-Sale Strategies and Return Predictability. Short-sellers contrarian; high short-volume stocks underperform by ~1.13%/week.
240 Hanaeda-Sarita 2009 Hanaeda, H.; Sarita, T. 2009 Securities Analysts Journal (Japan) 日経225銘柄入替効果. 採用銘柄イベント時+1.6% (announcement) 〜 +4% (effective) のpre-effective drift. Source surveyed in 大和総研/野村Quants reports.
298 Damodaran Young Companies Valuation Aswath Damodaran 2009 NYU Stern Working Paper - Valuing Young Growth Firms https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/papers/younggrowth.pdf
Framework for valuing pre-profit firms via "story-to-numbers": revenue path, target margin, reinvestment intensity, terminal year, and explicit failure probability. Recommends 20-40% failure haircut for early-stage loss-makers.
317 Kaplan-Stromberg 2009 "Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity" Steven N. Kaplan; Per Stromberg 2009 Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(1): 121-146 https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.1.121
LBO targets: debt/EV typically jumps to 60-90%; PE returns gross IRR 20%+ but net of fees only modestly above public equity.
324 Bates-Kahle-Stulz 2009 "Why Do U.S. Firms Hold So Much More Cash than They Used To?" Thomas W. Bates; Kathleen M. Kahle; Rene M. Stulz 2009 Journal of Finance 64(5): 1985-2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01492.x
US cash/asset ratio doubled 1980-2006 driven by R&D-intensive, low-leverage firms; net debt declined.
388 Cremers-Petajisto 2009 "How Active Is Your Fund Manager?" K.J. Martijn Cremers, Antti Petajisto 2009 Review of Financial Studies 22(9) https://academic.oup.com/rfs/article-abstract/22/9/3329/1599865
高Active Share (>80%) のアクティブファンドは1980-2003期間にベンチマークを年率 +1.13pp 上回る。低Active Share (closet indexer) は -0.50pp underperform。但し 2008年以降は高Active Share の優位は消失。
418 Lev-Radhakrishnan-Zhang 2009 "Organization Capital" Lev, Baruch; Radhakrishnan, Suresh; Zhang, Weining 2009 Abacus, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 275-298 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00289.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00289.x
Estimates "organization capital" (proxied by cumulative SG&A) and shows it has substantial value relevance and predicts future operating performance and stock returns, supporting the broader intangibles-revolution thesis.
510 Bessembinder-Maxwell-Venkataraman 2009 Block Liquidity Bessembinder, H.; Maxwell, W.; Venkataraman, K. 2009 Journal of Financial Economics Block trade transparency reduces transient price impact by ~25-50%; permanent impact unchanged.
520 Bebchuk-Cohen-Ferrell 2009 What Matters Corporate Governance Bebchuk, L.; Cohen, A.; Ferrell, A. 2009 Review of Financial Studies 22(2), 783-827 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn099
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhn099
E-Index(6項目entrenchment)。低E-Index銘柄が高E-Indexを年率α+3.5%上回る(1990-2003)。Q値も高い。
534 Farber-Hallock 2009 Layoff Stock Price Farber, H.S.; Hallock, K.F. 2009 Industrial and Labor Relations Review 62(4), 488-509 https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390906200404
DOI: 10.1177/001979390906200404
解雇発表event study: 1970年代-1.5%, 90年代以降-0.4%(短期)。長期1年累積はほぼ無相関。
629 ONeil 2009 How to Make Money in Stocks William J. O'Neil 2009 McGraw-Hill (4th ed.) IBD 100年分のチャート・財務分析からCAN SLIM 7因子(Current EPS/Annual EPS/New高値/Supply-Demand/Leader/Institutional/Market)を抽出。1880-2008年の最大上昇株600銘柄が事前にCAN SLIM条件を満たしていた。
632 Fahlenbrach 2009 Founder CEOs Rüdiger Fahlenbrach 2009 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 44(2) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109009090109
S&P1500中の創業者CEO企業(11.6%)は1992-2003年で年率8.3% Carhart-α、Tobin Q +12-16%。買収・R&D・CapExが多い。
35 Welch & Goyal 2008 Ivo Welch & Amit Goyal 2008 Review of Financial Studies 21(4) https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm014
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhm014
マクロ予測変数の不安定性。事前予測は事後リターンを捉えられない。
45 Caballero-Hoshi-Kashyap 2008 Ricardo Caballero, Takeo Hoshi, Anil Kashyap 2008 American Economic Review https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.5.1943
DOI: 10.1257/aer.98.5.1943
ゾンビ貸出(zombie lending)と日本の生産性低下の実証。
98 Caballero, Hoshi & Kashyap 2008 Ricardo J. Caballero, Takeo Hoshi, Anil K. Kashyap 2008 American Economic Review 98(5) https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.98.5.1943
Empirical evidence on Japanese 'zombie' firms (1993-2002), bank evergreening, and the misallocation cost. Provides JP-specific zombie firm prevalence numbers.
124 Cooper-Gulen-Schill 2008 "Asset Growth and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns" Michael Cooper, Huseyin Gulen, Michael Schill 2008 Journal of Finance 63(4) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01370.x
総資産成長率トップ-ボトム十分位で年率20%のリターン差 (低成長銘柄が勝つ)。M&A、CapEx、運転資本、財務発行を全て含む統合シグナル。
161 McKinsey Granularity of Growth Patrick Viguerie, Sven Smit, Mehrdad Baghai (McKinsey) 2008 McKinsey & Company / Wiley (book) https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-granularity-of-growth
Industry/sub-industry tailwinds explain 65% of corporate revenue growth - portfolio momentum + M&A only 35%. Critical for sector vs stock-selection attribution.
229 Boehmer-Jones-Zhang 2008 Boehmer, E.; Jones, C.; Zhang, X. 2008 Journal of Finance 63(2) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01334.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01334.x
Which Shorts Are Informed? Heavily shorted stocks underperform lightly shorted by ~1.6%/month equal-weighted, ~0.5%/month value-weighted.
234 Kaniel-Saar-Titman 2008 Kaniel, R.; Saar, G.; Titman, S. 2008 Journal of Finance 63(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01316.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01316.x
Individual Investor Trading and Stock Returns. Stocks intensely bought by individuals outperform by ~0.6% over next month.
305 Campbell-Hilscher-Szilagyi 2008 "In Search of Distress Risk" John Y. Campbell; Jens Hilscher; Jan Szilagyi 2008 Journal of Finance 63(6): 2899-2939 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01416.x
Distress-risk anomaly: highest-distress (highest leverage / failure-prob) stocks earn LOWER, not higher, returns. ~17% annual underperformance for top distress decile, 1981-2003.
325 Lemmon-Roberts-Zender 2008 "Back to the Beginning: Persistence and the Cross-Section of Corporate Capital Structure" Michael L. Lemmon; Michael R. Roberts; Jaime F. Zender 2008 Journal of Finance 63(4): 1575-1608 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01369.x
Capital structure is highly persistent; firm fixed effects explain >60% of cross-sectional variation in leverage.
337 McKinsey The Granularity of Growth (book) Patrick Viguerie, Sven Smit, Mehrdad Baghai 2008 McKinsey & Company / Wiley https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/the-granularity-of-growth
Decomposes growth of 200+ large companies into portfolio momentum (43%), M&A (35%), and market-share gain (22%). Argues growth comes mainly from where you compete, not how you compete.
358 BCG 2008 Value Creators Missing Link Boston Consulting Group 2008 BCG Publications https://web-assets.bcg.com/11/d7/9061c23e4401b44461173f0ddf79/vcr-2008.pdf
Foundational BCG TSR decomposition paper; canonical source for 4-driver decomposition (revenue growth, margin change, multiple change, cash-flow contribution).
363 CEB Stall Points (Olson Van Bever) Matthew S. Olson, Derek van Bever 2008 Yale University Press / Harvard Business Review (CEB study) https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300158519/stall-points/
CEB / HBR analysis of 600+ Fortune-100-size US firms 1955-2006: 87% experience growth stalls; 87% of stalls have controllable, internal root causes.
414 Nakamura-Steinsson 2008 "Five Facts about Prices: A Reevaluation of Menu Cost Models" Nakamura, Emi; Steinsson, Jon 2008 Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 1415-1464 https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/123/4/1415/1933166
DOI: 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1415
Documents median frequency of consumer price changes ~9-12% per month excluding sales (i.e., median price duration ~8-11 months). Substantial heterogeneity across industries: services prices change less frequently than goods. Useful baseline for inflation pass-through speed.
420 Fang-Palmatier-Steenkamp 2008 "Effect of Service Transition Strategies on Firm Value" Fang, Eric; Palmatier, Robert W.; Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E.M. 2008 Journal of Marketing, Vol. 72, No. 5, pp. 1-14 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1509/jmkg.72.5.001
DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.72.5.001
Examines link between marketing/intangible strategies and firm value. Highlights customer-relationship and service intangibles as drivers of Tobin's Q.
461 Welch-Goyal 2008 Comprehensive Look at Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction Ivo Welch, Amit Goyal 2008 Review of Financial Studies 21(4): 1455-1508 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm014
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhm014
CAPE/D/P等の長期予測力を再検証、in-sample強・out-of-sample弱
486 Karpoff-Lee-Martin 2008 Cooking the Books Karpoff, J. M.; Lee, D. S.; Martin, G. S. 2008 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 43(3): 581-611 Detected accounting fraud results in average -38% market value loss; 66% reputation, 25% legal penalty, 9% other.
492 Cox-Tiwana 2008 Patent Litigation Cox, J. D.; Tiwana, A. 2008 University of Pennsylvania Law Review Patent infringement lawsuits show -1% to -2.5% defendant CAR depending on damages.
521 Brav-Jiang-Partnoy-Thomas 2008 Hedge Fund Activism Brav, A.; Jiang, W.; Partnoy, F.; Thomas, R. 2008 Journal of Finance 63(4), 1729-1775 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01373.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01373.x
ヘッジファンド・アクティビスト介入13F event study: 介入announcement abnormal return +7%、1年累積+18%、3年でROAも改善。
536 Karpoff-Lee-Martin 2008 Cost Cooking Books Financial Misconduct Karpoff, J.M.; Lee, D.S.; Martin, G.S. 2008 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 43(3), 581-611 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000004221
DOI: 10.1017/S0022109000004221
不正会計企業 enforcement action 後 cumulative -38%。罰金は4-6%、レピュテーション失は66%。
554 Linck-Netter-Yang 2008 Effects Sarbanes-Oxley Linck, J.S.; Netter, J.M.; Yang, T. 2008 Review of Financial Studies 22(8), 3287-3328 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn084
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhn084
SOX後社外取締役比率は60%→72%に。小型株でガバナンスコスト増、α-2%/年。
644 Saito 2008 Family Firms Japan Takuji Saito 2008 Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 22(4) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2008.06.001
日本上場企業1990-1998で創業家経営企業はROA・Tobin Qが非家族企業を有意に上回る。創業者+後継世代でも持続。
708 Campbell-Hilscher-Szilagyi In Search of Distress Risk 2008 John Y. Campbell; Jens Hilscher; Jan Szilagyi 2008 Journal of Finance https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01389.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01389.x
Failure probability is linked to poor profitability, leverage, low market capitalization, low stock price, poor recent returns, and high volatility.
710 Pontiff-Woodgate Share Issuance and Cross-sectional Returns 2008 Jeffrey Pontiff; Artemiza Woodgate 2008 Journal of Finance https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01365.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01365.x
Net share issuance is a strong predictor of future cross-sectional stock returns.
713 Campbell-Hilscher-Szilagyi distress risk John Y. Campbell; Jens Hilscher; Jan Szilagyi 2008 Journal of Finance 63(6) https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/3199070
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01416.x
Dynamic distress model using accounting and market variables; high failure-risk equities have low average returns and high volatility.
720 Bharath-Shumway Merton distance to default Sreedhar T. Bharath; Tyler Shumway 2008 Review of Financial Studies 21(3) https://academic.oup.com/rfs/article/21/3/1339/1566804
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhn044
Tests Merton distance-to-default variables; finds a simple functional-form predictor and expanded hazard variables outperform raw Merton default probabilities out of sample.
734 Campbell Hilscher Szilagyi In Search of Distress Risk John Y. Campbell; Jens Hilscher; Jan Szilagyi 2008 Journal of Finance / NBER https://www.nber.org/papers/w12362
Distressed stocks have high failure probabilities and low subsequent returns; distress risk is not rewarded with higher expected returns.
741 Goyal Welch Equity Premium Prediction Amit Goyal; Ivo Welch 2008 Review of Financial Studies / NBER https://www.nber.org/papers/w10483
Many equity premium predictors perform poorly out of sample despite in-sample significance; valuation signals should be shrunk heavily.
784 The evolving relation between earnings, dividends, and stock repurchases Douglas J. Skinner 2008 Journal of Financial Economics https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X07002334
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.05.003
Repurchases increasingly substitute for dividends as earnings payouts, especially among regular repurchasers; supports not independently compounding dividends and buybacks in valuation paths.
10 Fama-French 2007 "Migration" Eugene Fama & Kenneth French 2007 Financial Analysts Journal 63(3) https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v63.n3.4690
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v63.n3.4690
バリュー→グロース migrationは20-25%(5年)。多数の「value trap」が存在。
40 Apple Turnaround 1997-2007 Multiple academic case studies 2007 HBS case Apple復活事例。MOAT再構築型ターンアラウンド。
46 Mauboussin "Death, Taxes, and Reversion to the Mean" Michael J. Mauboussin 2007 Credit Suisse / Legg Mason Capital Management (white paper) https://greenbackd.com/2010/04/21/roic-and-reversion-to-the-mean-part-1/
Empirical study of ROIC reversion using ~1,000 non-financial U.S. companies 1997-2006. Documents quintile transition probabilities, persistence rates, and serial correlation of ROIC. Original CSFB/Legg Mason white paper, December 2007.
119 Boudoukh-Michaely-Richardson-Roberts 2007 "On the Importance of Measuring Payout Yield" Jacob Boudoukh, Roni Michaely, Matthew Richardson, Michael Roberts 2007 Journal of Finance 62(2) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01219.x
配当のみでなくネット自社株買いを含めたペイアウトイールドが将来リターン予測力で配当利回り単独より優れる。
170 Robeco The Volatility Effect Lower Risk Without Lower Return David Blitz, Pim van Vliet (Robeco) 2007 Journal of Portfolio Management 34(1), 102-113 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=980865
Foundation paper for low-volatility investing. Decile-1 (lowest vol) earns ~12% annually 1986-2006, decile-10 ~6%. Sharpe ~0.7 vs ~0.3 globally - dramatic risk-adjusted outperformance.
296 Demers-Joos 2007 IPO Failure Elizabeth Demers, Philip Joos 2007 Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 34(7-8), 1303-1327 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02055.x
IPO failure prediction: ~22% of US IPOs delisted within 5 years of listing (1980-2000); failure rate ~30% in tech subsector. Loss at IPO + low cash + high leverage predicts failure.
316 Kayhan-Titman 2007 "Firms histories and their capital structures" Ayla Kayhan; Sheridan Titman 2007 Journal of Financial Economics 83(1): 1-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.10.007
Capital structure is shaped by both market timing AND target leverage; firms slowly revert toward target after deviations.
326 Penman-Richardson-Tuna 2007 "The Book-to-Price Effect in Stock Returns: Accounting for Leverage" Stephen H. Penman; Scott A. Richardson; Irem Tuna 2007 Journal of Accounting Research 45(2): 427-467 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00240.x
Decomposes B/P into operating B/P (positive return predictor) and leverage component (NEGATIVE predictor). Leverage destroys, not creates, return premium.
344 Sun & Tse When Does the Winner Take All Mei Sun, Edison Tse 2007 NET Institute working paper / Stanford https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24049755_When_Does_the_Winner_Take_All_in_Two-Sided_Markets
Theoretical model: winner-take-all only emerges when network effects are strong AND multi-homing/differentiation are weak; otherwise platforms split market.
345 Eisenmann Winner-Take-All in Networked Markets Thomas R. Eisenmann 2007 Harvard Business School background note 806-131 https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=33035
HBS framework note: WTA conditions = strong same-side network effects + low multi-homing + small need for differentiation. Cited as canonical platform-strategy reference.
395 Damodaran "Research and Development Expenses: Implications for Profitability Measurement and Valuation" Damodaran, Aswath 2007 NYU Stern Working Paper / Investment Valuation textbook chapter https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/papers/R&D.pdf
Provides framework to capitalize and amortize R&D, recompute earnings, book value, ROIC. Documents that for R&D-intensive firms (pharma, software) capitalized adjustments materially raise both invested capital and operating income, often lowering reported ROIC vs unadjusted.
665 Pabrai 2007 "The Dhandho Investor" Mohnish Pabrai 2007 Wiley 低リスク・高不確実性の heads-I-win / tails-I-do-not-lose-much 枠組み。長期コンパウンダー投資の哲学。
704 Boudoukh-Michaely-Richardson-Roberts 2007 Payout Yield Jacob Boudoukh, Roni Michaely, Matthew Richardson, Michael Roberts 2007 Journal of Finance 62(2) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01219.x
配当+自社株買い total payout yield上位デシルは年率+5-7% alpha (1971-2003)。配当のみ yield より予測力が高い。
719 Duffie-Saita-Wang multi-period default prediction Darrell Duffie; Leandro Saita; Ke Wang 2007 Journal of Financial Economics 83(3) https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/publications/multi-period-corporate-default-prediction-stochastic-covariates
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.10.011
Multi-period default hazard model using distance to default, trailing stock return, market returns, and interest rates across US industrial firm-month observations.
129 Villalonga-Amit 2006 "How Do Family Ownership, Control and Management Affect Firm Value?" Belen Villalonga, Raphael Amit 2006 Journal of Financial Economics 80(2) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X05002187
創業者CEOがいるファミリー企業はTobins Qが高いが、子孫CEOではプレミアムが消失。第二世代以降のCEOは価値破壊する傾向。
207 Ang Hodrick Xing Zhang 2006 The Cross Section of Volatility Andrew Ang, Robert Hodrick, Yuhang Xing, Xiaoyan Zhang 2006 Journal of Finance 61(1), 259-299 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00836.x
Foundation paper for low-volatility anomaly. High idiosyncratic-volatility stocks underperform low by ~1% per month. Robust across markets and time periods.
213 Ang-Hodrick-Xing-Zhang 2006 Ang, A.; Hodrick, R.; Xing, Y.; Zhang, X. 2006 Journal of Finance 61(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00836.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00836.x
The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns. Highest idiosyncratic volatility quintile underperforms by ~1%/month vs lowest. Low-vol anomaly.
231 Baker-Wurgler 2006 Baker, M.; Wurgler, J. 2006 Journal of Finance 61(4) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00885.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00885.x
Investor Sentiment and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns. High sentiment predicts low subsequent returns on speculative/hard-to-arbitrage stocks.
247 Bergstresser-Philippon 2006 Bergstresser, D.; Philippon, T. 2006 Journal of Financial Economics 80(3) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.011
CEO Incentives and Earnings Management. CEOs with more equity-based pay show stronger earnings management; subsequent returns lower.
248 Cotter-Tuna-Wysocki 2006 Cotter, J.; Tuna, I.; Wysocki, P. 2006 Contemporary Accounting Research 23(3) https://doi.org/10.1506/27CD-9XEN-K2T9-AHGV
DOI: 10.1506/27CD-9XEN-K2T9-AHGV
Expectations Management and Beatable Targets: How Do Analysts React to Explicit Earnings Guidance? Management guidance walks down analyst forecasts; ~70% of guiders meet/beat.
402 Madden-Fehle-Fournier 2006 "Brands Matter: An Empirical Demonstration of the Creation of Shareholder Value Through Branding" Madden, Thomas J.; Fehle, Frank; Fournier, Susan 2006 Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 224-235 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1177/0092070305283356
DOI: 10.1177/0092070305283356
Constructs portfolio of Interbrand-ranked Global Brands (1994-2000) and shows Fama-French-Carhart alpha of ~0.60% per month (~7.4% annualized) over and above market, size, value, and momentum, with lower systematic risk.
466 Daniel-Titman 2006 Market Reactions to Tangible and Intangible Information Kent Daniel, Sheridan Titman 2006 Journal of Finance 61(4): 1605-1643 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00884.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00884.x
B/M変化の中身を分解、過剰反応によるバリュー・プレミアム
471 Kothari-Lewellen-Warner 2006 Stock Returns Aggregate Earnings Kothari, S. P.; Lewellen, J.; Warner, J. B. 2006 Journal of Financial Economics 79(3): 537-568 Aggregate earnings news has weaker firm-level coefficient than firm-specific earnings; macro-aggregation washes out.
490 Acquisti-Friedman-Telang 2006 Privacy Breach Acquisti, A.; Friedman, A.; Telang, R. 2006 WEIS workshop / CMU Average -0.6% one-day CAR; effects mostly recover within 30 days for non-financial firms.
579 Lemmon Portniaguina 2006 Consumer Confidence Michael Lemmon; Evgenia Portniaguina 2006 Review of Financial Studies 19 (4) 1499-1529 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhj038
Empirical paper showing residual consumer confidence forecasts small-cap returns.
630 Greenblatt 2006 Magic Formula Joel Greenblatt 2006 The Little Book that Beats the Market (Wiley) 高 Earnings Yield + 高 ROIC で米国株を年次ランキング。1988-2004年バックテストで年率17.0% (S&P500 12.4%)。1988-2009年Forbesスタディ等で再現性確認。
744 Lu Zhang Value Spread Predictor Returns L. Zhang; J. Lu 2006 NBER / Journal of Financial Markets https://www.nber.org/papers/w11326
Value spread contains components with different predictive meanings; broad spread signals are not one clean variable.
104 Bernanke & Kuttner 2005 Ben S. Bernanke, Kenneth N. Kuttner 2005 Journal of Finance 60(3) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00760.x
Quantifies S&P 500 reaction to surprise FOMC rate moves. Foundational paper for equity duration / rate-sensitivity estimates.
109 Moeller-Schlingemann-Stulz 2005 "Wealth Destruction" Sara Moeller, Frederik Schlingemann, Rene Stulz 2005 Journal of Finance 60(2) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00745.x
1998-2001の期間、米国上場買収企業が公表3日間で累積約2,400億ドルの株主価値を喪失。大型買収のリターンが特に悪い。
232 Brown-Cliff 2005 Brown, G.; Cliff, M. 2005 Journal of Business 78(2) https://doi.org/10.1086/427633
DOI: 10.1086/427633
Investor Sentiment and Asset Valuation. AAII bullish sentiment negatively predicts 1-3 year market returns.
244 Clement-Tse 2005 Clement, M.; Tse, S. 2005 Journal of Finance 60(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00727.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00727.x
Financial Analyst Characteristics and Herding Behavior in Forecasting. Bold (anti-herd) forecasts more accurate than herding by ~5-10% MAFE reduction.
271 Eckbo-Norli 2005 Liquidity Risk B. Espen Eckbo, Oyvind Norli 2005 Journal of Corporate Finance 11(1-2), 1-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.02.002
Argues IPO firms have lower liquidity risk and lower leverage than benchmark firms; once these risk factors are controlled, long-run "underperformance" largely disappears. Important counterpoint to Ritter 1991.
392 Hall-Jaffe-Trajtenberg 2005 "Market Value and Patent Citations" Hall, Bronwyn H.; Jaffe, Adam; Trajtenberg, Manuel 2005 RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 16-38 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1593752
Patent citations are economically and statistically significant predictors of firm market value beyond R&D and patent counts. An extra citation per patent boosts market value ~3%. Documents convex relationship: highly cited patents disproportionately valuable.
493 Karpoff-Lott-Wehrly 2005 Environmental Fines Karpoff, J. M.; Lott, J. R.; Wehrly, E. W. 2005 Journal of Law and Economics 48(2): 653-675 Environmental violations: announcement effect averages -1.7%; magnitude proportional to fine size.
529 Hendricks-Singhal 2005 Long-Run Stock Performance Supply Chain Hendricks, K.B.; Singhal, V.R. 2005 Production and Operations Management 14(1), 35-52 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x
885件のサプライ分断発表分析。事前1年-12%、announcement当日-7.5%、その後1年さらに-10%。トータル約30%失う。
535 Karpoff-Lott-Wehrly 2005 Reputation Penalty Environmental Violations Karpoff, J.M.; Lott, J.R.; Wehrly, E.W. 2005 Journal of Law and Economics 48(2), 653-675 https://doi.org/10.1086/430806
DOI: 10.1086/430806
環境規制違反announcement abnormal return -1.69%。罰金額の9倍がレピュテーション損失。
739 Joos Plesko Valuing Loss Firms Peter Joos; George A. Plesko 2005 MIT Sloan working paper / Accounting Review related literature https://ideas.repec.org/p/mit/sloanp/5418.html
Loss firms should be valued differently depending on expected return to profitability and R&D content.
44 Hoshi-Kashyap 2004 Takeo Hoshi & Anil Kashyap 2004 Journal of Economic Perspectives 日本のゾンビ企業と失われた10年の論考。
99 Goyal & Yamada 2004 Vidhan K. Goyal, Takeshi Yamada 2004 Journal of Business 77(1) https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/379866
Empirical analysis of Japanese asset price collapse (1990s) and its effect on corporate investment. Provides early documentation of JP corporate distress channels.
108 Hoshi & Kashyap 2004 (already in DB; re-used) Takeo Hoshi, Anil K. Kashyap 2004 Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(1) https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/089533004773563412
Survey of JP banking crisis, lost decade and zombie firms.
123 Titman-Wei-Xie 2004 "Capital Investments and Stock Returns" Sheridan Titman, KC Wei, Feixue Xie 2004 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39(4) https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-financial-and-quantitative-analysis/article/abs/capital-investments-and-stock-returns/
異常CapEx (industry adj) が高い企業は将来リターンが低い。年率約-4-5%のスプレッド。過剰投資が長期株主リターンを毀損。
125 Eberhart-Maxwell-Siddique 2004 "An Examination of Long-Term Abnormal Stock Returns and Operating Performance Following R&D Increases" Allan Eberhart, William Maxwell, Akhtar Siddique 2004 Journal of Finance 59(2) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00642.x
R&D支出を大幅増加させた企業は5年間累積異常リターン+12.6%。市場はR&D投資の長期効果を過小評価する。
220 Hirshleifer-Hou-Teoh-Zhang 2004 Hirshleifer, D.; Hou, K.; Teoh, S.; Zhang, Y. 2004 Journal of Accounting and Economics 38 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.10.002
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.10.002
Do Investors Overvalue Firms with Bloated Balance Sheets? NOA scaled change predicts negative future returns; top-bottom decile spread ~18%/yr.
239 Nikkei 225 Index Reconstitution Effect (Chen-Noronha-Singal 2004) Chen, H.; Noronha, G.; Singal, V. 2004 Journal of Finance 59(4) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00683.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00683.x
The Price Response to S&P 500 Index Additions and Deletions. Additions +5.3%, deletions -8.4% (event window). Cited as benchmark for index-rebalance literature applicable to TOPIX.
262 Geroski-Gugler 2004 "Corporate Growth Convergence" Paul A. Geroski; Klaus P. Gugler 2004 CEPR Discussion Paper / Oxford Economic Papers https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=275009
Large European firms. Confirms Gibrat process best fits very large/mature firms; smaller/younger firms grow faster on average.
272 Loughran-Ritter 2004 Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Tim Loughran, Jay Ritter 2004 Financial Management 33(3), 5-37 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2004.tb00005.x
Documents three regimes of US IPO underpricing: 1980-89 ~7%, 1990-98 ~15%, 1999-2000 ~65%, 2001-03 ~12%. Bubble-period IPO median age 5y, fraction with negative EPS rose to ~80%.
286 Fama-French 2004 New Lists Eugene Fama, Kenneth French 2004 Journal of Financial Economics 73(2), 229-269 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.04.001
Profile of new listings 1973-2001: profitability of new lists fell sharply (cohort distribution shifted to negative earnings); growth higher but mortality much higher. Loss-making new lists more common in tech.
292 Helwege-Liang 2004 IPO Hot Markets Jean Helwege, Nellie Liang 2004 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39(3), 541-569 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000004026
Hot-market IPOs (clusters of high IPO volume) underperform: 5y BHAR ~ -30% vs cold-market IPOs. Driven by overvaluation / window dressing.
304 Welch 2004 "Capital Structure and Stock Returns" Ivo Welch 2004 Journal of Political Economy 112(1): 106-131 https://doi.org/10.1086/379933
Stock returns are the dominant driver of capital structure changes; firms do NOT issue securities to counteract equity-price-induced D/E movements.
323 Almeida-Campello-Weisbach 2004 "The Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash" Heitor Almeida; Murillo Campello; Michael S. Weisbach 2004 Journal of Finance 59(4): 1777-1804 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00679.x
Financially constrained firms hoard cash; explains why low-leverage firms in some samples are quality, others are constrained.
489 Cavusoglu-Mishra-Raghunathan 2004 Data Breach Cavusoglu, H.; Mishra, B.; Raghunathan, S. 2004 International Journal of Electronic Commerce 9(1): 70-104 Public data breaches yield -2.1% [-1,+1] CAR; pure-internet firms suffer significantly more (-5%).
496 Chen-Noronha-Singal 2004 S&P Index Effect Chen, H.; Noronha, G.; Singal, V. 2004 Journal of Finance 59(4): 1901-1930 Inclusion +5.5% permanent; deletion -8.5% but recovers. Asymmetry due to investor recognition.
498 Sharma-Lacey 2004 Pharma Phase Failures Sharma, A.; Lacey, N. 2004 Journal of Healthcare Marketing Phase III failure announcement: average -33% one-day CAR; small biotechs lose -50% to -70%; large pharma -10% to -15%.
638 George Hwang 2004 52WHigh Thomas J. George, Chuan-Yang Hwang 2004 Journal of Finance 59(5) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00695.x
52週高値近接度は予測力がモメンタムよりも強く、1963-2001米国で年率+0.45%/月の超過リターン。
653 Dorsey 2004 Five Rules Pat Dorsey 2004 Five Rules for Successful Stock Investing (Wiley) Morningstar wide-moat銘柄(無形資産・スイッチングコスト・ネットワーク・コスト優位・規模優位)は1990s-2000s年率+2-3%超過。
8 Chan-Karceski-Lakonishok 2003 Louis Chan, Jason Karceski, Josef Lakonishok 2003 Journal of Finance 58(2) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1540-6261.00540
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00540
EPS成長持続性の代表的実証。トップ分位の5年後維持率はランダム水準とほぼ変わらない(弱い persistence)。
128 Anderson-Reeb 2003 "Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance" Ronald Anderson, David Reeb 2003 Journal of Finance 58(3) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
S&P500のうちファミリー企業はROAで約6.6%、Tobins Qで約10%、非ファミリー企業より優れる。創業者CEOは特にパフォーマンスが高い。
246 Bens-Nagar-Skinner-Wong 2003 Bens, D.; Nagar, V.; Skinner, D.; Wong, M. 2003 Journal of Accounting and Economics 36(1-3) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.006
Employee Stock Options, EPS Dilution, and Stock Repurchases. SBC dilution offsets EPS; firms repurchase to mask dilution.
289 Schultz 2003 Pseudo Market Timing Paul Schultz 2003 Journal of Finance 58(2), 483-518 https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00535
Argues that long-run IPO underperformance documented in Ritter 1991 is partly statistical artifact of clustering: more firms IPO when valuations high, then later cohorts underperform mechanically.
294 Ofek-Richardson 2003 DotCom Mania Eli Ofek, Matthew Richardson 2003 Journal of Finance 58(3), 1113-1137 https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00560
Internet bubble: median internet stock fell 80% from peak (Mar 2000) to Dec 2002. Lockup expirations and short-sale constraints explain pricing dynamics.
359 Bain Net Promoter System Economics of Loyalty Fred Reichheld, Bain & Company 2003 Bain & Company Insights https://www.bain.com/insights/the-economics-of-loyalty/
Foundational paper on Net Promoter System: NPS explains 20-60% of variation in organic growth across industries; NPS leaders outgrow competitors by >2x.
393 Reichheld 2003 "The One Number You Need to Grow" (Net Promoter Score) Reichheld, Frederick F. 2003 Harvard Business Review, December 2003 https://hbr.org/2003/12/the-one-number-you-need-to-grow
Introduces Net Promoter Score (NPS) as predictor of company growth. Across studied industries, top NPS leaders grew at >2x average industry growth rate. Bain follow-up research extends linkage to TSR and customer-retention economics.
411 Anderson-Banker-Janakiraman 2003 "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs Sticky?" Anderson, Mark C.; Banker, Rajiv D.; Janakiraman, Surya N. 2003 Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 47-63 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-679X.00095
DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.00095
Documents cost stickiness: SG&A costs rise ~0.55% per 1% increase in revenue but fall only ~0.35% per 1% decrease. Asymmetry implies effective operating leverage is higher in revenue declines than rises -> EPS more sensitive to recessions.
431 McKinsey "Pricing: The Next Frontier of Value Creation" (Marn-Roegner-Zawada 2003 / The Price Advantage updates) Marn, Michael V.; Roegner, Eric V.; Zawada, Craig C. 2003 McKinsey Quarterly / Wiley book "The Price Advantage" (2004, updates 2010, 2018) https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/the-power-of-pricing
McKinsey practitioner finding: a 1% improvement in price (volumes held constant) yields ~8-11% increase in operating profit for typical S&P 500 industrial; pricing is the highest-leverage value driver vs variable cost (-1% -> ~5-7%) and volume (+1% -> ~3-4%).
437 Asness 2003 Fight the Fed Model Clifford S. Asness 2003 Journal of Portfolio Management 30(1): 11-24 https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2003.319916
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2003.319916
E/Pと債券利回り比較(Fed model)を統計的に否定。E/P絶対水準が将来リターン予測
459 Schwert 2003 Anomalies and Market Efficiency G. William Schwert 2003 Handbook of the Economics of Finance Vol1B https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0102(03)01024-0
DOI: 10.1016/S1574-0102(03)01024-0
バリュー・サイズ・モメンタム等アノマリーの長期実証サーベイ
519 Gompers-Ishii-Metrick 2003 Corporate Governance Equity Prices Gompers, P.A.; Ishii, J.L.; Metrick, A. 2003 Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1), 107-156 https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535162
DOI: 10.1162/00335530360535162
G-Index(24項目株主権スコア)。democracy銘柄が dictatorship銘柄をα+8.5%/年で上回った(1990-99)。
528 Hendricks-Singhal 2003 Supply Chain Glitches Shareholder Wealth Hendricks, K.B.; Singhal, V.R. 2003 Journal of Operations Management 21(5), 501-522 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.003
サプライ分断announcement abnormal return ‐10.28%/2日窓、‐40%/1年。回復に2年以上かかる。
545 Coffee 2003 What Caused Enron Coffee, J.C. 2003 Cornell Law Review 89, 269-309 https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol89/iss2/2
エンロン崩壊原因分析: ガバナンス失敗・監査人独立性欠如・stock-based compensationのincentive歪み。
589 Bloom Canning Sevilla 2003 Demographic Dividend David Bloom; David Canning; Jaypee Sevilla 2003 RAND MR-1274 (book) https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1274.html
Empirical analysis of demographic dividend / drag on long-run real GDP growth.
601 Nelson 2003 TED Spread Banking Crisis Edward Nelson 2003 St. Louis Fed Working Paper 2003-018A https://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2003/2003-018.pdf
TED-spread analysis as a measure of bank funding stress (used in 2007-08 references).
633 Anderson Reeb 2003 Family Firms Ronald C. Anderson, David M. Reeb 2003 Journal of Finance 58(3) https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
S&P500 1992-1999で家族保有企業(全体の35%)はROA・Tobin Qともに非家族企業を有意に上回る。家族CEOがいる場合に効果最大。
706 Chan-Karceski-Lakonishok Level and Persistence of Growth Rates 2003 Louis K. C. Chan; Jason Karceski; Josef Lakonishok 2003 Journal of Finance https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00540
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00540
Long-term operating and earnings growth persistence is weak; very high long-term growth is rare.
789 Chan Karceski Lakonishok growth persistence evidence Louis K. C. Chan; Jason Karceski; Josef Lakonishok 2003 Journal of Finance https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/the-level-and-persistence-of-growth-rates
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00540
Broad public-firm evidence finds high long-term earnings growth is rare and weakly predictable; supports keeping software scale-up persistence gated rather than broadly raising growth assumptions.
34 Amihud 2002 Yakov Amihud 2002 Journal of Financial Markets 5(1) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6
DOI: 10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6
流動性プレミアム実証。流動性低い株は年率2-4%超過リターン。
39 IBM Turnaround case (Gerstner) Louis Gerstner 2002 HarperBusiness (book) 1993-2002 IBM ターンアラウンド事例。代表的回復成功例。
97 Hayashi & Prescott 2002 Fumio Hayashi, Edward C. Prescott 2002 Review of Economic Dynamics 5(1) https://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/sr/sr294.pdf
Seminal account of Japan's lost decade as a productivity slowdown rather than a demand failure. Used as anchor for JP lost-decade growth assumptions.
267 Loughran-Ritter 2002 Money on the Table Tim Loughran, Jay R. Ritter 2002 Review of Financial Studies 15(2), 413-444 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.2.413
Why issuers do not get upset about underpricing: prospect-theory and bargaining model. Documents "money left on the table" (avg ~$9M per IPO in late-1990s, much larger in 1999-2000) and links high-underpricing IPOs to subsequent long-run underperformance.
396 Grabowski-Vernon-DiMasi 2002 "Returns on Research and Development for 1990s New Drug Introductions" Grabowski, Henry; Vernon, John; DiMasi, Joseph A. 2002 PharmacoEconomics, Vol. 20, Suppl. 3, pp. 11-29 https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00019053-200220003-00002
DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220003-00002
Distribution of pharmaceutical R&D returns is highly skewed: top decile drugs produce most of the returns; mean after-tax IRR on 1990s NCEs ~11.5% (vs ~10.5% cost of capital). Long-tail nature of pharma economics anchors patent-cliff risk math.
472 Skinner-Sloan 2002 Earnings Surprises Skinner, D. J.; Sloan, R. G. 2002 Review of Accounting Studies 7: 289-312 Growth firms suffer asymmetric punishment to negative earnings surprises: average abnormal return -4% to -5% per 1% miss.
473 Bartov-Givoly-Hayn 2002 Meet Beat Bartov, E.; Givoly, D.; Hayn, C. 2002 Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(2): 173-204 Firms meeting/beating analyst forecasts earn 3-7% higher quarterly abnormal returns than those missing.
491 Bhagat-Romano 2002 Lawsuits Bhagat, S.; Romano, R. 2002 American Law and Economics Review 4(1): 141-167 Class action securities lawsuit filings: -2% [-1,+1] CAR; settlement vs trial loss differential significant.
783 Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis Gustavo Grullon; Roni Michaely 2002 Journal of Finance https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfinan/v57y2002i4p1649-1684.html
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00474
Repurchases became an important payout channel and are partly financed with funds that otherwise would have increased dividends; supports treating payout channels as substitutes sharing a capital-return budget.
18 Foster (BCG) "Creative Destruction" Richard Foster & Sarah Kaplan 2001 McKinsey/Doubleday (book) S&P500寿命中央値1958年=61年→2012年=18年に短縮。産業構造変化期は回復率が通常の半分以下。
30 Cornell & Liu 2001 Bradford Cornell & Qiao Liu 2001 Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 日本企業のフォローアップ研究、長期低迷ケーススタディ多数。
110 Andrade-Mitchell-Stafford 2001 "New Evidence on M&A" Gregor Andrade, Mark Mitchell, Erik Stafford 2001 Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(2) https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.15.2.103
1973-1998の米国M&Aデータ。買収側CARは公表時 -0.7%、ターゲットは+16%。長期では買収側のリターンは小さくマイナス傾向。
126 Chan-Lakonishok-Sougiannis 2001 "The Stock Market Valuation of R&D Expenditures" Louis Chan, Josef Lakonishok, Theodore Sougiannis 2001 Journal of Finance 56(6) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0022-1082.00411
R&D集約度が高い企業 (R&D/Sales > 5%) は超過リターンを示す。R&D/MV最高五分位は最低五分位を年率約7%上回る。R&D成果は会計に反映されないため市場が過小評価。
130 Lakonishok-Lee 2001 "Are Insider Trades Informative?" Josef Lakonishok, Inmoo Lee 2001 Review of Financial Studies 14(1) https://academic.oup.com/rfs/article/14/1/79/1579691
インサイダー買いは将来リターン予測力あり。買い超企業は12ヶ月後+7.8%超過リターン、売り超企業は予測力弱い。小型株でシグナルが特に強い。
147 Fama-French 2001 "Disappearing Dividends" Eugene Fama, Kenneth French 2001 Journal of Financial Economics 60(1) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X01000383
1978-1999で配当銘柄は66%→20%に減少。配当銘柄は無配銘柄より大型・高ROA・低成長機会。配当開始/停止には強い情報シグナル効果。
238 Daniel-Titman-Wei 2001 Daniel, K.; Titman, S.; Wei, J. 2001 Journal of Finance 56(2) https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00345
DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00345
Explaining the Cross-Section of Stock Returns in Japan: Factors or Characteristics? Strong B/M premium ~6%/yr in Japan; size weaker post-1990.
255 Nissim-Penman 2001 "Ratio Analysis and Equity Valuation" Doron Nissim; Stephen H. Penman 2001 Review of Accounting Studies http://www.columbia.edu/~dn75/Ratio_analysis_and_equity_valuation_From_research_to_practice.pdf
Compustat firms 1963-1999. Decomposition of ROCE persistence; documents typical long-run steady-state ratio levels and mean reversion of components.
295 Cooper-Dimitrov-Rau 2001 dotcom Effect Michael Cooper, Orlin Dimitrov, P. Raghavendra Rau 2001 Journal of Finance 56(6), 2371-2388 https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00408
Documents the "dotcom" name change effect: firms that added .com / .net / Internet to name during 1998-99 earned cumulative abnormal returns of +74% in 10 days around announcement, regardless of actual business model.
331 Hoshi-Kashyap "Corporate Financing and Governance in Japan: The Road to the Future" Takeo Hoshi; Anil K. Kashyap 2001 MIT Press (book) Japanese firms historically high bank-debt leverage with main-bank monitoring; shift toward bond/equity markets and lower D/E post-1990s.
376 Foster-Kaplan "Creative Destruction: Why Companies That Are Built to Last Underperform the Market" Richard Foster, Sarah Kaplan 2001 Currency/Doubleday https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/176787/creative-destruction-by-richard-foster-and-sarah-kaplan/
1957年S&P 500 構成500社のうち1998年でも残存し独立企業として運営しているのは74社 (15%)。S&P構成銘柄tenure 1935年 75年 → 1990年 30年 → 1998年 約20年 → 2020s 18年。1980年代以降の上場企業survivalrate激減を実証。
481 Dichev-Piotroski 2001 Bond Rating Changes Dichev, I. D.; Piotroski, J. D. 2001 Journal of Finance 56(1): 173-203 Bond downgrades (from above-IG to below-IG especially) trigger -10% to -14% one-year stock returns. Upgrades show no significant return.
504 Mitchell-Pulvino 2001 Risk Arbitrage Mitchell, M.; Pulvino, T. 2001 Journal of Finance 56(6): 2135-2175 Average target premium in completed M&A: 31% to 41% (over pre-announcement); transaction costs reduce arb returns to 4%.
508 Almgren-Chriss 2001 Block Trade Impact Almgren, R.; Chriss, N. 2001 Journal of Risk Permanent price impact of block trades scales as ~k * sqrt(volume/ADV); ADV-relative trades of 5% generate ~30bp permanent impact.
634 Lakonishok Lee 2001 Insider Trades Josef Lakonishok, Inmoo Lee 2001 Review of Financial Studies 14(1) https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.1.79
1975-1995年米国Form 4データで、役員買い銘柄は買い後12カ月で市場対比+4.8%、cluster買いは+7-8%。売りシグナルは予測力弱い。
707 Shumway Forecasting Bankruptcy More Accurately 2001 Tyler Shumway 2001 Journal of Business https://doi.org/10.1086/209665
DOI: 10.1086/209665
A hazard model using market size, past returns, and return volatility improves bankruptcy prediction.
740 Campbell Shiller Valuation Ratios Long-Run Outlook John Y. Campbell; Robert J. Shiller 2001 NBER / Journal perspective https://www.nber.org/papers/w8221
Valuation ratios forecast long-run stock price changes better than future earnings/dividend growth; high valuation implies lower long-run returns but poor short-term timing.
9 Fama-French 2000 "Forecasting Profitability and Earnings" Eugene Fama & Kenneth French 2000 Journal of Business 73(2) https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/209638
DOI: 10.1086/209638
利益率と利益成長は強い平均回帰。半減期3-5年程度。
22 Pandit 2000 (BCG) Nitin Pandit 2000 Strategy & Business ターンアラウンド成功事例の業績悪化→EPSピーク回復までの中央値6.5年。
28 Hong-Lim-Stein 2000 Harrison Hong, Terence Lim, Jeremy Stein 2000 Journal of Finance 55(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00206
DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00206
アナリストによる悪材料予測の遅延(bad news travels slowly)。
137 Mitchell-Stafford 2000 "Managerial Decisions and Long-Term Stock Price Performance" Mark Mitchell, Erik Stafford 2000 Journal of Business 73(3) https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/209650
1961-1993米国買収企業の長期リターン分析。3年累積異常リターン (BHAR) は約-4%。Calendar-time portfolio approachでは統計的に有意でない領域も多い。
150 Schwert 2000 "Hostility in Takeovers: In the Eyes of the Beholder?" G. William Schwert 2000 Journal of Finance 55(6) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0022-1082.00301
敵対的買収 (hostile) は友好的買収よりプレミアムが大きいが、長期リターンに有意差なし。「敵対」のラベルは交渉プロセスの結果でしかなく、本質的な価値創造の差は小さい。
196 AQR Style Timing Value vs Growth Cliff Asness, Jacques Friedman, Robert Krail, John Liew 2000 Journal of Portfolio Management 26(3), 50-60 https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/Style-Timing-Value-versus-Growth
Examines whether value vs growth can be timed by valuation spread. Finds spread predicts forward 3-5y value-minus-growth returns with R2 ~25%.
215 Piotroski 2000 Piotroski, J. 2000 Journal of Accounting Research 38 (Supplement) https://doi.org/10.2307/2672906
DOI: 10.2307/2672906
Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. F-Score 8-9 portfolio outperforms F-Score 0-1 by 23%/yr in high-BM universe 1976-1996.
233 Whaley 2000 Whaley, R. 2000 Journal of Portfolio Management 26(3) https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2000.319728
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2000.319728
The Investor Fear Gauge. High VIX (>30) historically followed by above-average S&P returns 30-60 days.
235 Barber-Odean 2000 Barber, B.; Odean, T. 2000 Journal of Finance 55(2) https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00226
DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00226
Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth. Most-active individual investors underperform by 6.5%/yr after costs (1991-1996).
236 Chan-Hameed-Tong 2000 Chan, K.; Hameed, A.; Tong, W. 2000 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35(2) https://doi.org/10.2307/2676188
DOI: 10.2307/2676188
Profitability of Momentum Strategies in the International Equity Markets. Japan a notable exception: momentum effect statistically insignificant; period 1980-1995.
270 Brav-Geczy-Gompers 2000 Anomalous Alon Brav, Christopher Geczy, Paul Gompers 2000 Journal of Financial Economics 56(2), 209-249 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00040-4
Long-run returns to IPOs and SEOs are not anomalous once Fama-French style risk-based factor matching is used: small low-B/M factor premia drive most of it.
328 Graham 2000 "How Big Are the Tax Benefits of Debt?" John R. Graham 2000 Journal of Finance 55(5): 1901-1941 https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00277
Tax shield value of debt averages ~9-10% of firm value at observed leverage; firms could increase leverage to add another ~7% but choose not to (under-leverage puzzle).
436 Shiller 2000 Irrational Exuberance Robert J. Shiller 2000 Princeton University Press https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691166261/irrational-exuberance
CAPE>25時のバブル警告、高CAPE後の長期リターン低下を歴史データで示す
469 Bamber-Christensen-Gaver 2000 ERC Bamber, L. S.; Christensen, T. E.; Gaver, K. M. 2000 Accounting and Business Research 30(2): 103-115 Surveys earnings response coefficient (ERC) literature; ERC typically 1-3 implying market overreacts/underreacts depending on persistence.
639 Hong Lim Stein 2000 Coverage Harrison Hong, Terence Lim, Jeremy C. Stein 2000 Journal of Finance 55(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00206
アナリスト・カバレッジ少数(下位1/3)銘柄でモメンタムが2倍強化。情報が緩慢に拡散。
686 IBM Annual Reports 1993-2000 IBM Corporation 2000 SEC EDGAR IBM 1993年Gerstner就任時株価約$12→2000ピーク約$120。約10倍 (700-900%)。services pivotの成功事例。
705 Fama-French Forecasting Profitability and Earnings 2000 Eugene F. Fama; Kenneth R. French 2000 Journal of Business https://doi.org/10.1086/209638
DOI: 10.1086/209638
Profitability and earnings tend to mean revert; the speed is higher when profitability is far from normal and below normal.
728 Fama French Forecasting Profitability and Earnings Eugene F. Fama; Kenneth R. French 2000 Journal of Business 73(2):161-175 https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jnlbus/v73y2000i2p161-75.html
Profitability and earnings are mean reverting; partial-adjustment estimates imply substantial annual reversion toward normal profitability.
742 AQR Style Timing Value versus Growth Clifford S. Asness; Jacques A. Friedman; Robert J. Krail; John M. Liew 2000 Journal of Portfolio Management / AQR https://www.aqr.com/-/media/AQR/Documents/Journal-Articles/Style-Timing-Value.PDF?sc_lang=en
Value spread and expected earnings-growth spread predicted value-vs-growth returns in 1982-1999 sample; spread-only R2 about 22.8%, combined about 38.7%.
113 KPMG "Unlocking Shareholder Value: The Keys to Success" M&A study KPMG 1999 KPMG Transaction Services https://kpmg.com/
1996-1998のクロスボーダー大型M&A 700件分析。83%が株主価値を増加させなかった、17%のみが成功と判定。
194 Rouwenhorst 1999 Local Return Factors and Turnover in Emerging Stock Markets Geert Rouwenhorst 1999 Journal of Finance 54(4), 1439-1464 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0022-1082.00151
Documents value, momentum, size factors in 20 emerging markets 1982-1997. Size and value premia robust in EM; small-cap premium in EM ~6-7% annualised.
217 Beneish 1999 Beneish, M. 1999 Financial Analysts Journal 55(5) https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296
The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. M-Score logit model identifies ~76% of earnings manipulators with 17.5% Type-I error. Cutoff -2.22 / -1.78.
288 Lyon-Barber-Tsai 1999 Improved Methods John D. Lyon, Brad M. Barber, Chih-Ling Tsai 1999 Journal of Finance 54(1), 165-201 https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00101
Methodology for long-run abnormal returns: BHAR vs CAR, calendar-time vs event-time, pseudo-portfolio bootstrapping. Industry standard for IPO long-run studies.
315 Spiess-Affleck-Graves 1999 "The Long-Run Performance of Stock Returns Following Debt Offerings" D. Katherine Spiess; John Affleck-Graves 1999 Journal of Financial Economics 54(1): 45-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00031-8
Debt-issuing firms underperform matched non-issuers by ~14% over 5 years post-issue, especially convertibles and non-investment-grade.
745 Stambaugh Predictive Regressions Robert F. Stambaugh 1999 NBER Technical Working Paper https://www.nber.org/papers/t0240
Persistent predictors and long-horizon regressions can generate bias; overlapping windows exaggerate effective sample size.
773 Valuing IPOs Kim; Ritter 1999 Journal of Financial Economics https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X99000276
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00027-6
Comparable multiples, including price-to-sales, have use for young growth firms but are imprecise and require adjustment for profitability and growth differences.
88 Estrella & Mishkin 1998 Arturo Estrella, Frederic S. Mishkin 1998 Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1) https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr30.html
Probit model of US recessions using yield curve slope (10y-3m). Foundational empirical evidence that yield-curve inversion predicts recessions 12 months ahead.
227 Daniel-Hirshleifer-Subrahmanyam 1998 Daniel, K.; Hirshleifer, D.; Subrahmanyam, A. 1998 Journal of Finance 53(6) https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00077
DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00077
Investor Psychology and Security Market Under- and Overreactions. Overconfidence + biased self-attribution explain momentum + long-term reversal.
228 Barberis-Shleifer-Vishny 1998 Barberis, N.; Shleifer, A.; Vishny, R. 1998 Journal of Financial Economics 49(3) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00027-0
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00027-0
A Model of Investor Sentiment. Conservatism (underreaction) + representativeness (overreaction) generate PEAD + reversals.
306 Dichev 1998 "Is the Risk of Bankruptcy a Systematic Risk?" Ilia D. Dichev 1998 Journal of Finance 53(3): 1131-1147 https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00046
High-bankruptcy-risk stocks (high Z-score / O-score) earn ABNORMALLY LOW returns 1981-1995. Distress risk is NOT a priced systematic risk factor.
329 Rajan-Zingales 1998 "Financial Dependence and Growth" Raghuram G. Rajan; Luigi Zingales 1998 American Economic Review 88(3): 559-586 https://www.jstor.org/stable/116849
Industries that depend on external finance grow faster in countries with developed financial markets; leverage availability accelerates growth.
342 Lieberman & Montgomery First-Mover (Dis)Advantages 1998 Marvin B. Lieberman, David B. Montgomery 1998 Strategic Management Journal 19 (12): 1111-1125 https://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/marvin.lieberman/publications/FMA2-SMH1998.pdf
Retrospective: empirical first-mover effects mostly observed on market share, not on profitability or survival; results sensitive to research design choices.
441 Fama-French 1998 Value vs Growth The International Evidence Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French 1998 Journal of Finance 53(6): 1975-1999 https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00080
DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00080
13ヶ国でバリュー>グラマーを実証 (1975-1995). HMLグローバル化
447 Bauman-Conover-Miller 1998 Growth versus Value and Large-Cap versus Small-Cap W. Scott Bauman, C. Mitchell Conover, Robert E. Miller 1998 Financial Analysts Journal 54(2): 75-89 https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v54.n2.2168
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v54.n2.2168
21ヶ国 1986-1996 でバリュー>グラマーを確認 (国際実証)
537 Bhagat-Bizjak-Coles 1998 Litigation Effect Stock Bhagat, S.; Bizjak, J.; Coles, J.L. 1998 Journal of Financial Economics 47(2), 221-247 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00045-9
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00045-9
訴訟提起announcement: 抗トラスト訴訟-0.85%、製造物責任-0.79%、特許-1.4%。提訴後1年で約半分回復。
580 Bram Ludvigson 1998 NY Fed Consumer Confidence Jason Bram; Sydney Ludvigson 1998 FRBNY Economic Policy Review (June 1998) https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/epr/98v04n2/9806bram.html
NY Fed paper on Conference Board vs U-Mich; correlation with personal consumption expenditure (PCE) by category.
659 Bauman Conover Miller 1998 Growth Value W. Scott Bauman, C. Mitchell Conover, Robert E. Miller 1998 Financial Analysts Journal 54(2) https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v54.n2.2167
21カ国1986-1996バリュー(低PB)銘柄は成長(高PB)銘柄より年率+5-7%。
760 Hamao Loughran Japanese Seasoned Equity Offerings Yasushi Hamao; Tim Loughran 1998 Pacific-Basin Finance Journal https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X98000195
Japanese seasoned equity offerings show weak long-run performance, similar to US SEO evidence.
20 Christensen "The Innovators Dilemma" Clayton Christensen 1997 Harvard Business Review Press (book) 破壊的技術によるsecular decline中の既存企業の回復率は10-25%(ケーススタディ集約)。
111 Loughran-Vijh 1997 "Do Long-Term Shareholders Benefit From Corporate Acquisitions?" Tim Loughran, Anand Vijh 1997 Journal of Finance 52(5) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb01112.x
5年累積異常リターン分析。株式交換型買収はバイ&ホールドで-24.2%、現金買収は+18.5%。支払方法と長期リターンの強い関係。
146 Hayward-Hambrick 1997 "Explaining the Premiums Paid for Large Acquisitions: Evidence of CEO Hubris" Mathew Hayward, Donald Hambrick 1997 Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2307/2393810
CEOのhubris指標 (メディア称賛、最近の好業績、CEO報酬) が高い企業ほど買収プレミアム支払い大、買収後株主リターン悪化。
192 Carhart 1997 On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance Mark Carhart 1997 Journal of Finance 52(1), 57-82 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
Foundational paper for the Carhart 4-factor model: Mkt-Rf, SMB, HML, UMD (momentum). UMD ~9% annual premium 1963-1993.
245 Mikhail-Walther-Willis 1997 Mikhail, M.; Walther, B.; Willis, R. 1997 Journal of Accounting Research 35 (Supplement) https://doi.org/10.2307/2491456
DOI: 10.2307/2491456
Do Security Analysts Improve Their Performance with Experience? Experience reduces forecast error ~5-10%, but firm-specific experience matters more than general.
269 Brav-Gompers 1997 Myth or Reality Alon Brav, Paul Gompers 1997 Journal of Finance 52(5), 1791-1821 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02742.x
Compares VC-backed vs non-VC-backed IPOs 1972-92. Non-VC IPOs underperform substantially; VC-backed IPOs roughly track Fama-French benchmarks. Emphasizes importance of size and B/M matching.
449 Dechow-Sloan 1997 Returns to Contrarian Investment Strategies Patricia M. Dechow, Richard G. Sloan 1997 Journal of Financial Economics 43(1): 3-27 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00897-6
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00897-6
アナリスト予想の系統的バイアスがLakonishok-Shleifer-Vishny効果を生む
468 MacKinlay 1997 Event Studies MacKinlay, A. C. 1997 Journal of Economic Literature 35(1): 13-39 Survey of event-study methodology. Establishes [-1,+1] window standards and CAR aggregation.
509 Loughran-Vijh 1997 Cash vs Stock Loughran, T.; Vijh, A. M. 1997 Journal of Finance 52(5): 1765-1790 Stock-financed acquirers underperform cash-financed by ~42pp over 5 years post-merger; difference persistent across deal types.
663 Greenblatt 1997 "You Can Be a Stock Market Genius" Joel Greenblatt 1997 Simon & Schuster スピンオフ・特殊状況投資の体系化。Gotham CapitalのスピンオフポートフォリオでS&P+15%/yr超のalphaを実証。
142 Lev-Sougiannis 1996 "The Capitalization, Amortization, and Value-Relevance of R&D" Baruch Lev, Theodore Sougiannis 1996 Journal of Accounting and Economics 21(1) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0165410195004102
R&Dを資本化したケースでROICは平均15-25%改善 (償却年数業種別で異なる)。R&D集約企業は会計上のリターンが過小評価されている。
216 Sloan 1996 Sloan, R. 1996 The Accounting Review 71(3) https://www.jstor.org/stable/248290
Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows about Future Earnings? High-accruals decile earns -10.4%/yr abnormal return vs low-accruals. Foundational accruals anomaly.
222 Chan-Jegadeesh-Lakonishok 1996 Chan, L.; Jegadeesh, N.; Lakonishok, J. 1996 Journal of Finance 51(5) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05222.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05222.x
Momentum Strategies. Earnings-momentum (analyst revision) strategy yields ~7-9%/yr alpha; PEAD persists 6 months.
224 Womack 1996 Womack, K. 1996 Journal of Finance 51(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05205.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05205.x
Do Brokerage Analysts Recommendations Have Investment Value? Buy-recommendation upgrades show +3% 3-day & +2.4% 1-month drift; sells -9% 6-month drift.
390 Lev-Sougiannis 1996 "The Capitalization, Amortization, and Value Relevance of R&D" Lev, Baruch; Sougiannis, Theodore 1996 Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 21, Issue 1, pp. 107-138 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0165410195004102
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(95)00410-6
Estimates R&D capital and amortization. Finds R&D capital is value-relevant: associated with subsequent earnings, stock prices, and returns. Documents cross-sectional R&D-return relation interpreted as either compensation for risk or systematic mispricing of R&D-intensive firms.
448 La Porta 1996 Expectations and Cross-Section of Stock Returns Rafael La Porta 1996 Journal of Finance 51(5): 1715-1742 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05223.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05223.x
アナリスト長期成長予想の上位/下位ポートフォリオ比較。高予想銘柄の継続的アンダー
478 Womack 1996 Brokerage Analyst Recs Womack, K. L. 1996 Journal of Finance 51(1): 137-167 Analyst upgrades earn +3% [-1,+1] CAR and downgrades -4% to -5%. Drift continues for 1-6 months.
29 Loughran-Ritter 1995 Tim Loughran & Jay Ritter 1995 Journal of Finance 50(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05166.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05166.x
IPO後3-5年の長期パフォーマンスは市場をアンダーパフォーム。
116 Ikenberry-Lakonishok-Vermaelen 1995 "Market Underreaction to Open Market Share Repurchases" David Ikenberry, Josef Lakonishok, Theo Vermaelen 1995 Journal of Financial Economics 39(2) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0304405X9500826Z
米国1980-1990の自社株買い実施企業1,239社。発表後4年累積異常リターン+12.1%、バリュー銘柄では+45.3%、グラマー銘柄では有意でない。
120 Michaely-Thaler-Womack 1995 "Price Reactions to Dividend Initiations and Omissions" Roni Michaely, Richard Thaler, Kent Womack 1995 Journal of Finance 50(2) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04796.x
配当開始後1年累積異常リターン+7.5%、3年累積+24.8%。配当停止後1年-11.0%、3年-15.3%。配当政策変更の長期ドリフト効果を確認。
293 Loughran-Ritter 1995 New Issues Puzzle Tim Loughran, Jay Ritter 1995 Journal of Finance 50(1), 23-51 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05166.x
Foundational. IPO and SEO firms 1970-1990 underperform matched-size controls by ~30% over 5 years. Severe for small growth firms; less for VC-backed.
303 Rajan-Zingales 1995 "What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data" Raghuram G. Rajan; Luigi Zingales 1995 Journal of Finance 50(5): 1421-1460 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05184.x
Cross-country G7 leverage determinants: tangibility (+), size (+), profitability (-), market-to-book (-). Japan and Germany higher book leverage than US/UK.
314 Loughran-Ritter 1995 "The New Issues Puzzle" Tim Loughran; Jay R. Ritter 1995 Journal of Finance 50(1): 23-51 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05166.x
Firms issuing equity earn -7%/yr vs non-issuers for 5 years post-issue. Issuance reduces leverage and signals overvaluation.
484 Michaely-Thaler-Womack 1995 Dividend Initiation Michaely, R.; Thaler, R. H.; Womack, K. L. 1995 Journal of Finance 50(2): 573-608 Dividend omissions: -7% announcement CAR plus -15% over 3 years. Initiations: +3.4% CAR plus +25% drift over 3 years.
505 Loughran-Ritter 1995 SEO Loughran, T.; Ritter, J. R. 1995 Journal of Finance 50(1): 23-51 SEOs underperform matched non-issuers by ~7% per year over 5 years post-issue.
640 Ikenberry Lakonishok Vermaelen 1995 David Ikenberry, Josef Lakonishok, Theo Vermaelen 1995 Journal of Financial Economics 39(2-3) https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00826-Z
1980-1990年米国自社株買い発表後4年間で価値株は+45.3% 超過リターン。
711 Ikenberry-Lakonishok-Vermaelen Open Market Repurchases 1995 David Ikenberry; Josef Lakonishok; Theo Vermaelen 1995 Journal of Financial Economics https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00826-Z
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(95)00826-Z
Open-market repurchase announcements are followed by positive long-horizon abnormal returns, especially for value stocks.
47 Lakonishok-Shleifer-Vishny 1994 Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny 1994 Journal of Finance 49(5) https://www.nber.org/papers/w4360
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04772.x
Documents 7-9% per year underperformance of glamour vs value stocks over 1968-1990 U.S. sample, attributing the gap to systematic earnings disappointment (extrapolation bias). Earnings of glamour stocks expected to grow 2.5% slower than value stocks but actually grew 38.6% slower per year.
759 Kang Stulz Japanese Corporate Finance Jun-Koo Kang; Rene M. Stulz 1994 NBER https://www.nber.org/papers/w4908
DOI: 10.3386/w4908
Japanese security issuance announcement and issue-date evidence differs from US; issuance effect depends on firm context.
17 Pearce-Robbins 1993 John Pearce & Keith Robbins 1993 Journal of Management 19(3) ターンアラウンド研究のメタ分析: 全業種平均30-35%回復成功率。
208 Jegadeesh-Titman 1993 Jegadeesh, N.; Titman, S. 1993 Journal of Finance 48(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. 6-12M momentum strategy yields ~12%/yr abnormal return on US stocks 1965-1989.
210 Fama-French 1993 Fama, E.; French, K. 1993 Journal of Financial Economics 33(1) https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. SMB and HML factors; HML earned 4.4-5.0%/yr 1963-1991.
485 Karpoff-Lott 1993 Reputational Penalty Karpoff, J. M.; Lott, J. R. 1993 Journal of Law and Economics 36(2): 757-802 Firms charged with criminal fraud lose ~6.5% of market value; ~93% of loss is reputational damage not legal penalty.
573 Boudoukh Richardson 1993 "Stock Returns and Inflation" Boudoukh Jacob; Richardson Matthew 1993 Financial Analysts Journal 49 (6) 47-52 https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v49.n6.47
Long-horizon (1802-1990) cross-section: stocks positively related with inflation in long horizons; negative short-run reaction.
636 Jegadeesh Titman 1993 Momentum Narasimhan Jegadeesh, Sheridan Titman 1993 Journal of Finance 48(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
過去6-12カ月リターン上位デシルが翌3-12カ月でも有意+1%/月の超過リターン。1965-1989米国NYSE/AMEX。
658 Lynch Rothchild 1993 Beating Street Peter Lynch, John Rothchild 1993 Beating the Street (Simon & Schuster) 21の選定原則。経営者持株増・自社株買い・低機関保有・新高値・PEG<1。
664 Cusatis-Miles-Woolridge 1993 "Restructuring Through Spinoffs" Patrick J. Cusatis, James A. Miles, J. Randall Woolridge 1993 Journal of Financial Economics 33 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90009-Z
1965-1988年米国スピンオフ146件。スピンオフ後3年間、市場対比+76%超過リターン。親会社も+33%超過。
148 Healy-Palepu-Ruback 1992 "Does Corporate Performance Improve After Mergers?" Paul Healy, Krishna Palepu, Richard Ruback 1992 Journal of Financial Economics 31(2) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0304405X9290002F
1979-1984の50大型M&A。買収後5年で営業CFリターンが業界平均超え (中央値+2.8pp)。同業種・関連事業買収でより明確な改善。
440 Fama-French 1992 Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French 1992 Journal of Finance 47(2): 427-465 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x
B/M(PBR逆数)とサイズが横断的に株式リターンを説明。バリュー・プレミアム文献の基点
487 Davidson-Worrell 1992 Product Recalls Davidson, W. N. III; Worrell, D. L. 1992 Strategic Management Journal 13(6): 467-473 Auto product recalls show -1.4% to -2.1% [-1,+1] CAR for issuing firm.
641 Fama French 1992 SMB Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French 1992 Journal of Finance 47(2) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x
1963-1990米国でSMB (size factor) 年率+3-4%。マイクロキャップで増幅。
748 Campbell Hamao Predictable Stock Returns US Japan John Y. Campbell; Yasushi Hamao 1992 Journal of Finance https://dash.harvard.edu/entities/publication/73120378-8706-6bd4-e053-0100007fdf3b
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb03978.x
Japan monthly excess returns have predictability from dividend-price ratio and interest-rate variables; global risk variables matter.
144 Hambrick-Fukutomi 1991 "The Seasons of a CEOs Tenure" Donald Hambrick, Gregory Fukutomi 1991 Academy of Management Review 16(4) https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amr.1991.4279621
CEO在任は5期に分かれ、第3期 (在任6-10年) がパフォーマンスのピーク。10年超はマンネリ化・反応性低下で衰退。
153 Dechow-Sloan 1991 "Executive Incentives and the Horizon Problem" Patricia Dechow, Richard Sloan 1991 Journal of Accounting and Economics 14(1) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/016541019190058S
CEOが退任直前 (任期終盤) はR&D削減傾向、約-30%と短期業績優先のホライズン問題。長期投資の機会喪失。
191 Brinson Singer Beebower 1991 Determinants of Portfolio Performance II Gary Brinson, Brian Singer, Gilbert Beebower 1991 Financial Analysts Journal 47(3), 40-48 https://www.cfainstitute.org/-/media/documents/article/financial-analysts-journal/Determinants-of-Portfolio-Performance-II-An-Update.pdf
Asset-allocation determines ~91.5% of return variability over time; security selection ~5% and timing ~2%. Sector/factor tilts (asset class proxy) dominate stock-picking for long-term returns.
223 Stickel 1991 Stickel, S. 1991 The Accounting Review 66(2) https://www.jstor.org/stable/247800
Common Stock Returns Surrounding Earnings Forecast Revisions: More Puzzling Evidence. Upward revisions earn ~3% over 6 months post-revision; downward revisions equal/larger negative drift.
268 Ritter 1991 Long-Run Performance of IPOs Jay R. Ritter 1991 Journal of Finance 46(1), 3-27 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03743.x
Foundational paper on IPO long-run underperformance: 1,526 US IPOs 1975-84, 3y BHAR of -29% vs matched controls; underperformance concentrated among small, young, growth firms.
479 Stickel 1991 Earnings Forecast Revisions Stickel, S. E. 1991 Accounting Review 66(2): 402-416 Analyst forecast revisions trigger 0.5-1.5% same-day price reaction per 1% revision; sign-asymmetric.
14 DeAngelo & DeAngelo 1990 Harry DeAngelo & Linda DeAngelo 1990 Journal of Finance 45(5) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05095.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05095.x
減配企業の80-85%が3年後も劣位。前ピーク復帰は20%未満。
403 Bain & Company "The Economics of Loyalty" / Reichheld-Sasser 1990 "Zero Defections" Reichheld, Frederick F.; Sasser, W. Earl Jr. 1990 Harvard Business Review, September-October 1990 https://hbr.org/1990/09/zero-defections-quality-comes-to-services
Foundational study showing 5pp improvement in customer retention rate increases firm-level profits 25%-95% across nine industries. Anchors NPS / loyalty economics literature.
221 Bernard-Thomas 1989 Bernard, V.; Thomas, J. 1989 Journal of Accounting Research 27 (Supplement) https://doi.org/10.2307/2491062
DOI: 10.2307/2491062
Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift: Delayed Price Response or Risk Premium? Top SUE decile beats bottom by ~18% annualized over 60 trading days post-earnings.
470 Easton-Zmijewski 1989 ERC Easton, P. D.; Zmijewski, M. E. 1989 Journal of Accounting and Economics 11(2-3): 117-141 Cross-sectional variation in earnings response coefficients linked to growth, persistence, risk.
480 Bernard-Thomas 1989 PEAD Bernard, V. L.; Thomas, J. K. 1989 Journal of Accounting Research 27 Suppl: 1-36 Top-decile SUE portfolio outperforms bottom by ~9% over 60 days post-announcement. Foundational PEAD finding.
628 Lynch 1989 One Up On Wall Street Peter Lynch with John Rothchild 1989 Simon & Schuster Magellan基金13年間の運用実績(年率29%)から、テンバガー(10倍化)銘柄に共通する特徴をカテゴリー別(Stalwarts/Fast Growers/Turnarounds等)に整理。低機関保有・地味な業種・PEG<1・自社株買い等。
662 Peter Lynch 1989 "One Up On Wall Street" Peter Lynch, John Rothchild 1989 Simon & Schuster Magellan Fund 13年の年率29.2%の運用記録と銘柄選定の方法論。tenbagger発掘の枠組み。
341 Lieberman & Montgomery First-Mover Advantages Marvin B. Lieberman, David B. Montgomery 1988 Strategic Management Journal 9 (S1): 41-58 https://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/marvin.lieberman/publications/FMA1-SMJ1988.pdf
Foundational paper identifying three first-mover advantages: technological leadership, preemption of scarce assets, switching-cost lock-in.
435 Campbell-Shiller 1988 Stock Prices Earnings Expected Dividends John Y. Campbell, Robert J. Shiller 1988 Journal of Finance 43(3): 661-676 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb04598.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb04598.x
VAR分析で価格-配当比率の長期予測力を示した古典。低PE時はreal return高、高PE時は低
483 Healy-Palepu 1988 Dividend Initiation Omission Healy, P. M.; Palepu, K. G. 1988 Journal of Financial Economics 21(2): 149-175 Dividend omissions trigger -9.5% [-1,+1] CAR; subsequent earnings indeed decline confirming signal content.
297 Beatty-Ritter 1986 Investment Banking IPO Randolph Beatty, Jay Ritter 1986 Journal of Financial Economics 15(1-2), 213-232 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90055-3
Original underpricing model: greater ex-ante uncertainty -> larger first-day return. Foundation for empirical IPO literature.
482 Holthausen-Leftwich 1986 Bond Rating Holthausen, R. W.; Leftwich, R. W. 1986 Journal of Financial Economics 17(1): 57-89 Bond downgrades cause ~-2.7% [-1,+1] CAR; upgrades trigger insignificant reaction. Speculative-grade transitions strongest.
488 Pruitt-Peterson 1986 Recalls Pruitt, S. W.; Peterson, D. R. 1986 Journal of Financial Research 9(2): 113-122 Mean -0.69% one-day CAR after recall; large/mandatory recalls -3% to -5%.
494 Harris-Gurel 1986 Index Inclusion Harris, L.; Gurel, E. 1986 Journal of Finance 41(4): 815-829 S&P 500 inclusion: average +3.1% announcement-day price increase; partially reverses over weeks.
495 Shleifer 1986 Demand Curves Shleifer, A. 1986 Journal of Finance 41(3): 579-590 S&P 500 inclusion permanent +2.8% price; supports downward-sloping demand curves for stocks.
506 Asquith-Mullins 1986 Equity Issue Asquith, P.; Mullins, D. W. 1986 Journal of Financial Economics 15(1-2): 61-89 Seasoned equity offering announcement: -3% [-1,+1] CAR for industrial issuers.
709 Palepu Predicting Takeover Targets 1986 Krishna G. Palepu 1986 Journal of Accounting and Economics https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(86)90008-X
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(86)90008-X
Takeover target prediction depends on firm characteristics; size and resource imbalance are important base-rate controls.
209 De Bondt-Thaler 1985 De Bondt, W.; Thaler, R. 1985 Journal of Finance 40(3) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05004.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05004.x
Does the Stock Market Overreact? Long-term losers (prior 3-5y) outperform winners by ~25% over subsequent 36 months. Foundational long-term reversal evidence.
241 Kato-Schallheim 1985 Kato, K.; Schallheim, J. 1985 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 20(2) https://doi.org/10.2307/2330954
DOI: 10.2307/2330954
Seasonal and Size Anomalies in the Japanese Stock Market. January + June effects in Japan 1952-1980; small-cap January return ~5-7%.
467 Brown-Warner 1985 Event Studies Brown, S. J.; Warner, J. B. 1985 Journal of Financial Economics 14(1): 3-31 Foundational paper establishing methodology for daily event studies. Shows market model abnormal returns are robust to many specifications.
302 Myers-Majluf 1984 "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have" Stewart C. Myers; Nicholas S. Majluf 1984 Journal of Financial Economics 13(2): 187-221 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0
Pecking-order theory: information asymmetry -> firms prefer internal funds > debt > equity issuance.
409 Mandelker-Rhee 1984 "The Impact of the Degrees of Operating and Financial Leverage on Systematic Risk of Common Stock" Mandelker, Gershon N.; Rhee, S. Ghon 1984 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 45-57 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-financial-and-quantitative-analysis/article/abs/impact-of-the-degrees-of-operating-and-financial-leverage-on-systematic-risk-of-common-stock/
DOI: 10.2307/2331000
Empirically links degree of operating leverage (DOL) and degree of financial leverage (DFL) to equity beta. Both DOL and DFL positively and significantly related to systematic risk: high-fixed-cost firms have higher betas. Anchors operating-leverage -> EPS-sensitivity -> drawdown chain.
24 Hambrick-Schecter 1983 Donald Hambrick & Steven Schecter 1983 Academy of Management Journal 26(2) 成熟業界の業績悪化局面: 約30%が3-5年で回復。
16 Bibeault 1982 Donald Bibeault 1982 McGraw-Hill (book) "Corporate Turnaround": 5年間の回復成功率38%。製造業はやや低め。
320 Christie 1982 "The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variances" Andrew A. Christie 1982 Journal of Financial Economics 10(4): 407-432 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(82)90018-6
Empirical confirmation: equity-vol elasticity to leverage ~0.3-0.5; mechanical leverage explains part but not all of the asymmetric vol pattern.
33 Banz 1981 Rolf Banz 1981 Journal of Financial Economics 9(1) https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(81)90018-0
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(81)90018-0
サイズプレミアム(小型株効果)の最初の実証。
193 Banz 1981 Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks Rolf Banz 1981 Journal of Financial Economics 9(1), 3-18 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0304405X81900180
Original size-effect paper. NYSE smallest decile earned ~19.8% annualised vs largest ~9.0% annualised 1936-1975. Excess return ~12.1% per year for smallest minus largest CRSP decile.
714 Ohlson bankruptcy prediction James A. Ohlson 1980 Journal of Accounting Research 18(1) https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:joares:v:18:y:1980:i:1:p:109-131
DOI: 10.2307/2490395
Probabilistic bankruptcy prediction using accounting ratios including total liabilities to total assets and profitability.
301 Myers 1977 "Determinants of Corporate Borrowing" Stewart C. Myers 1977 Journal of Financial Economics 5(2): 147-175 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0
Debt-overhang / under-investment: existing debt makes shareholders refuse positive-NPV projects whose value mostly accrues to creditors.
574 Fama Schwert 1977 Asset Returns and Inflation Eugene F. Fama; G. William Schwert 1977 Journal of Financial Economics 5(2) 115-146 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90014-9
Foundational paper showing US equity returns negatively correlated with expected and unexpected inflation in 1953-71.
15 Schendel-Patton-Riggs 1976 Dan Schendel, G.R. Patton, James Riggs 1976 Journal of General Management 54社サンプル: 28%のみ持続的回復。古典的ターンアラウンド研究。
319 Black 1976 "Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes" Fischer Black 1976 Proceedings of the 1976 Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economics Statistics Section Original "leverage effect": equity vol rises as stock price falls because D/E rises mechanically.
410 Lev 1974 "On the Association Between Operating Leverage and Risk" Lev, Baruch 1974 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 627-641 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-financial-and-quantitative-analysis/article/abs/on-the-association-between-operating-leverage-and-risk/
DOI: 10.2307/2329764
Original study demonstrating positive cross-sectional relation between operating leverage (fixed-cost intensity) and systematic risk in three industries (electric utilities, steel, oil). Foundational reference for operating-leverage research.
627 Phelps 1972 100 to 1 Thomas William Phelps 1972 100 to 1 in the Stock Market (Bookcell Books) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_William_Phelps
1932-1971年で100倍化した米国上場365銘柄を抽出。長期保有・反復可能なビジネスモデル・大きなTAMを共通項として提示。
661 Tom Phelps 1972 "100 to 1 in the Stock Market" Thomas William Phelps 1972 McGraw-Hill 1932-1971年に米国株式で100倍以上のリターンを記録した銘柄を分析。長期コンパウンダー研究の古典。365銘柄のうちの上位事例。
21 Altman Z-Score Edward Altman 1968 Journal of Finance 23(4) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x
Z-Score 1.81未満の企業は2年内倒産確率が顕著に上昇。
474 Ball-Brown 1968 Earnings Information Ball, R.; Brown, P. 1968 Journal of Accounting Research 6(2): 159-178 First event study; 50% of new earnings information impounded in price by announcement.
256 Stigler 1963 "Capital and Rates of Return" George J. Stigler 1963 NBER General Series #78, Princeton University Press https://www.nber.org/books/stig63-1
US manufacturing 1938-1956. Found persistent profit rate dispersion (CV 21.9% in 1938-47, 31.5% in 1947-56) contradicting strict competitive mean reversion.
300 Modigliani-Miller 1963 "Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction" Franco Modigliani; Merton H. Miller 1963 American Economic Review 53(3): 433-443 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809167
With corporate taxes, debt creates a tax shield -> firm value rises with leverage. Theoretical foundation for trade-off theory.
299 Modigliani-Miller 1958 "The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment" Franco Modigliani; Merton H. Miller 1958 American Economic Review 48(3): 261-297 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809766
M&M Proposition I/II: under perfect capital markets, firm value is independent of capital structure; CoE rises linearly with D/E offsetting cheaper debt.
654 Fisher 1958 Common Stocks Philip A. Fisher 1958 Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (Wiley) 15ポイント・チェックリスト(成長余地/R&D/営業組織/利益率/経営姿勢等)を満たす銘柄が長期大化け。
727 Damodaran Valuing commodity and cyclical companies Aswath Damodaran NYU Stern valuation paper https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/papers/commodity.pdf
Use normalized earnings/cash flows for commodity and cyclical firms. Methods include average earnings over a full cycle, normalized margins on current revenues, and sector cycle averages.
730 McKinsey Through-cycle investment in mining McKinsey & Company McKinsey Metals & Mining https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/metals-and-mining/our-insights/through-cycle-investment-in-mining
Mining market capitalizations and capital expenditure are strongly correlated with commodity prices; valuation should normalize through commodity cycles.
731 IATA Value Chain Profitability International Air Transport Association IATA Economics https://www.iata.org/en/iata-repository/publications/economic-reports/value-chain-profitability/
Airline ROIC has historically been low and cyclical, with upturn and downturn profitability often below estimated WACC.
743 Research Affiliates Value Premium Mean-Reverting Research Affiliates Research Affiliates article https://www.researchaffiliates.com/insights/publications/articles/7-the-value-premium-is-mean-reverting
Extreme value/growth valuation spreads have preceded large value rebounds, but timing is noisy and episode-dependent.
746 Damodaran PE Ratio Determinants Aswath Damodaran NYU Stern valuation material https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invfables/peratio.htm
P/E depends on growth, payout, risk/cost of equity, and interest-rate environment; multiple compression is usually repricing of these variables.
747 Mauboussin Callahan Valuation Multiples Michael Mauboussin; Dan Callahan Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global Insights https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_valuationmultiples.pdf
Valuation multiples compress ROIC, growth, risk, accounting, capital structure, and intangibles; simple high/low multiple signals require context.
利用規約 | プライバシーポリシー | サイトマップ